Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 48

A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2013, 10:06
Question Stats:
32% (02:58) correct 68% (02:50) wrong based on 44 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly over another circular gear with a dia of 96cm. Both gears run on the same axle at their exact centres and each gear has a single notch at the 12 O clock position. At the same moment the gears start to rotate at the same rate, with the larger gear moving clockwise and the smaller gear moving anticlockwise. How far in centimetres will the notch on the larger gear have moved the second time the notches pass each other? A) 38.4*pi B) 31.6*pi C) 19*pi D) 25*pi E) 41.6*pi
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4471

Re: A circular gear
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2013, 14:49
12bhang wrote: A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly over another circular gear with a dia of 96cm. Both gears run on the same axle at their exact centres and each gear has a single notch at the 12 O clock position. At the same moment the gears start to rotate at the same rate, with the larger gear moving clockwise and the smaller gear moving anticlockwise.
How far in centimetres will the notch on the larger gear have moved the second time the notches pass each other?
A) 38.4*pi B) 31.6*pi C) 19*pi D) 25*pi E) 41.6*pi I'm happy to help with this. For finding when they pass each other, the sizes don't matter, because only rotational rate matters. One turns clockwise, one counterclockwise. They start at the same place, 12 o'clock position. When they each turn 180 degrees, they pass the first time at the 6 o'clock position. Then they each travel another 180 degrees, they pass each other a second time back at the 12 o'clock position. Thus, at the second passing, each one has made a full 360 rotation. How far in centimeters will the notch on the larger (d = 96 cm) gear travel in one 360degree revolution? Well, that's one circumference ===> c = (pi)*d = 96*pi centimeters. This is not listed as an answer, so something is badly messed up about this question. Either the answers listed do not include the correct answer, due to a typo, or the way the question is phrased does not accurately capture what the question writer was trying to say. Either way, this is a faulty question. (If getting it wrong made you doubt yourself, take heart  it's not you!) Does all all this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test PrepEducation is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)



Intern
Joined: 27 Jul 2013
Posts: 13

Re: A circular gear
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2013, 16:55
I beg to (politely differ) from Mike.... I believe the answer is A. My explanation: the size does matter because by the time the smaller gear (circumference 24*pi) goes full circle(i.e 360degrees), it wud have moved a distance of 24*pi.... and the larger gear, by moving the same distance of 24*pi wud have only gone a quarter of its total distance (i.e a quarter of 96*pi)... in a nut shell, by moving a distance of 24*pi, smaller gear has gone full circle, so its back at 12oclock and larger gear has only just covered a quarter of its whole distance. So they must have met somewhere in the 1st quadrant. ( FIRST MEETING POINT) by the time the smaller gear has gone another half circle, i.e a distance of 12*pi more, it will be positioned at the 6oclock point.. and it wud have covered 36*pi distance in all... and for the larger gear to have covered 36*pi in distance it'll will only be at the mid point, around 135 degrees... so because the smaller gear can cover its track faster than the larger gear (cos of its shorter distance), their SECOND MEETING POINT will be closer to the current position of the larger gear (just a little after its 135 degree mark). And looking thru the answer choices, that'll be somewhere around the 38.4*pi mark..... and NOT the 41.6*pi mark.... So answer will be A... P.S Mike, ur product ( Magoosh) is amazing... Currently on the 1week trial... I just might upgrade...



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4471

Re: A circular gear
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2013, 17:54
MBArenaissance wrote: I beg to (politely differ) from Mike....
I believe the answer is A. Dear MBArenaissance, Ah, good work. I had no idea where they were getting their answers, but now I have a very focused idea of the problem with the question. The problem comes down to this phrase: the gears start to rotate at the same rateWhat does " at the same rate" mean? We could talk about either (a) a linear speed, called the tangential velocity in Physics, as MBArenaissance and as, apparently, the question author intended. or (b) a rotation speed, called the angular velocity or angular frequency in Physics. This was my interpretation. I would argue that, if by " same rate" they intend "same linear speed", that needs to be stated unambiguously as part of the problem. I would argue that in most context in which the phrase " rotate at the same rate" is used, the general assumption is that the rotational speeds, not the linear speeds, are equal. That most certainly would be the assumption in a Physics context. One thing that would have made the problem much clearer is if, instead of being coaxial (a strange configuration for gears!), the gears were actually on the same plane and interlocked the way gears are supposed to be. That would guarantee equal tangential velocities in an unambiguous way. Again, I would say that if anyone approaches this question and is utterly befuddled by the choices available, that's not the fault of the test taker. That's the fault of some rather shoddy phrasing in this question. Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test PrepEducation is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)



Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 623
Location: India

Re: A circular gear
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2013, 19:05
The need to make the right assumption is what makes this question difficult. If the assumption that the number of rotations per minute be equal is made, then there is practically nothing to solve. Also there are no choices that correspond to this assumption. Considering the difficulty level of the question and also considering the fact that there are no choices that support the equal rotations per minute assumption, I think the student has to make the assumption that the linear speed only is the same.
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman Sravna Test Prep http://www.sravnatestprep.comHolistic and Systematic Approach



Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 48

Re: A circular gear
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Aug 2013, 23:40
Thank you for your responses. But, I cannot understand two things:
A) The questions states that the gears are mounted on the same axle , then how can one turn clockwise and the other anti co lcokwise?
B) What MBAintern said makes sense when the gears are meshing. Then the linear velocity will be constant and the angular velocity will be inversely proportional to the dia.
i.e N2/N1=D2/D1
Then, I suppose when the question states that one gear is mounted directly over another, it actually means that they are in a mesh arrangement.
If they weren't then there is no way of imagining one can rotate clockwise and the other goes anti clockwise.
Having said that, I would like to ask you guys whether you think this question is a GMAT type question.
I was curious about this question only because of my engineering background.



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4471

Re: A circular gear
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2013, 10:13
12bhang wrote: Thank you for your responses. The questions states that the gears are mounted on the same axle , then how can one turn clockwise and the other anticlockwise?
I was curious about this question only because of my engineering background. Dear 12bhang,Actually, although I focus on the GMAT now, I have a Physics background. I believe this is a very poor question, probably designed by someone who was trying to write a challenging question but who really does not good physical/mechanical intuition. One could imagine a scenario in which the gears are coaxial but rotating in opposite directions. For example, suppose there were a central iron pole, and there were two cylindrical sleeves, well lubricated, around the rod, and each gear was mounted on one of those sleeves. The central pole simply provides alignment and support, not motion. The motion of the gears would have to be driven by something else, belts or cables or something. That is a complicated, but conceivable scenario in which the motion of the gears could be in opposite directions and entirely independent. I believe the question is trying to describe something like that, but " on the same axle" is indeed misleading. If a GMAT math question is well written, one does not need any external knowledge of engineering, economics, etc. etc. A good GMAT math question is a complete entity unto itself, unambiguously providing all the data you need to answer the question. This question falls abysmally short of that standard. Does all this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test PrepEducation is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)



Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2018
Posts: 104

Re: A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jun 2018, 11:19
So what do we do? It looks like there is an unresolved debate over this one. Can someone else state their opinion or should the question be ignored till further notice?
Posted from my mobile device



Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2017
Posts: 249

Re: A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2018, 09:00
According to the Q: Speed of rotation is same (linear speed) Diameters of Large : Small are in ratio: 4:1 (96:24) So, 4 rotations on small gear = 1 rotation on large gear. Or, 1 rotation on small gear = 0.25 rotation on large gear. Direction of rotation: opposite (small anti clockwise, large clockwise) To calculate: distance traveled by a notch on large gear when notch of large gear meets notch on small gear for the second time. Instance #1: Small gear 1 rot = notch back at 12 o clock Large gear= 0.25 rot = notch at 3 o o clock i.e. 0.25 on the circumstance Instance #2: Small gear Another 0.5 rot= notch at 6 o clock Large gear = 0.25/2 rot = notch at 4.30 on clock i.e. 0.25 + 0.125= 0.375 on circumference Meeting Point: Using relative distance and speed concept Relative Distance between two notches is 1/8 of circumference on large gear= 0.125 Angular speed is in ratio small:large= 4:1 Relative speed: 5x Time to meet: 0.125/5x = 0.025x In this time, distance traveled by large gear speed x: 0.025 Position of large gear is= 96pi/(0.375+0.025) = 96pi/0.4= 38.4pi Ans A Posted from my mobile device



VP
Joined: 07 Dec 2014
Posts: 1218

A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2018, 12:20
12bhang wrote: A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly over another circular gear with a dia of 96cm. Both gears run on the same axle at their exact centres and each gear has a single notch at the 12 O clock position. At the same moment the gears start to rotate at the same rate, with the larger gear moving clockwise and the smaller gear moving anticlockwise.
How far in centimetres will the notch on the larger gear have moved the second time the notches pass each other?
A) 38.4*pi B) 31.6*pi C) 19*pi D) 25*pi E) 41.6*pi ratio of large to small gear diameters is 4:1 thus, ratio of large gear to small gear revolutions is 1:4 at 1st notch meeting, large gear has made 1/5 revolution clockwise while small gear has made 4/5 revolution counterclockwise at 2nd notch meeting, large gear has made 2/5 revolution clockwise while small gear has made 8/5 revolutions counterclockwise 2/5*96⫪=38.4⫪ A



Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2018
Posts: 104

Re: A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2018, 16:17
Okay, thanks guys!
Posted from my mobile device



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13724

Re: A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Nov 2019, 07:31
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: A circular gear with a diameter of 24cm is mounted directly
[#permalink]
27 Nov 2019, 07:31






