Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 per [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jun 2007, 21:02

1

This post received KUDOS

21

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (03:09) correct
27% (02:44) wrong based on 516 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 percent more than the store had originally paid for the clock. When the collector tried to resell the clock to the store, the store bought it back at 50 percent of what the collector had paid. The shop then sold the clock again at a profit of 80 percent on its buy-back price. If the difference between the clock's original cost to the shop and the clock's buy-back price was $100, for how much did the shop sell the clock the second time?

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 percent more than the store had originally paid for the clock. When the collector tried to resell the clock to the store, the store bought it back at 50 percent of what the collector had paid. The shop then sold the clock again at a profit of 80 percent on its buy-back price. If the difference between the clock's original cost to the shop and the clock's buy-back price was $100, for how much did the shop sell the clock the second time?

A. $270 B. $250 C. $240 D. $220 E. $200

Assume numbers and then use ratios to fit them in with the actual numbers.

Say the store bought the clock for $100 and sold it to the collector for $120. The store bought back from the collector for $60 and sold it back at $60*18/10 = $108 Here, difference between original cost ($100) and buy back price ($60) is $40. But actually it is given to be $100 which is 2.5 times 40. So the shop sold the clock a second time for $108*2.5 = $270
_________________

Re: A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 per [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jun 2015, 23:35

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

The question is a bit wordy and gives us a series of percentages on which we need to work on. Going step wise is the key to not miss out on any of the information. Presenting the detailed step wise solution

Step-I- Store buys the clock Let's assume the original price of clock paid by the store to be \(x\)

Step-II- Collectors buys the clock from the store Extra amount paid by collector to buy the clock = \(20\)% of \(x\)

Therefore price at which collector buys the clock = \(x + 20\)% of \(x = 1.2x\)

Step-III- Store buys back the clock from collector Price at which the store buys the clock = \(50\)% of price collector paid \(= 50\)% of \(1.2x = 0.6x\)

Step-IV- Store resells the clock Price at which store resells the clock = \(0.6x + 80\)% of \(0.6x = 0.6x * 1.8\)

Now, we are given that difference between clock's original price and clock's buy back price = \(100\)

\(x - 0.6x = 100\) i.e. \(x = 250\)

We are asked to find the price at which the store resells the clock = \(0.6x * 1.8 = 0.6 * 250 * 1.8 = 270\)

Re: A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 per [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jul 2015, 13:39

EgmatQuantExpert wrote:

The question is a bit wordy and gives us a series of percentages on which we need to work on. Going step wise is the key to not miss out on any of the information. Presenting the detailed step wise solution

Step-I- Store buys the clock Let's assume the original price of clock paid by the store to be \(x\)

Step-II- Collectors buys the clock from the store Extra amount paid by collector to buy the clock = \(20\)% of \(x\)

Therefore price at which collector buys the clock = \(x + 20\)% of \(x = 1.2x\)

Step-III- Store buys back the clock from collector Price at which the store buys the clock = \(50\)% of price collector paid \(= 50\)% of \(1.2x = 0.6x\)

Step-IV- Store resells the clock Price at which store resells the clock = \(0.6x + 80\)% of \(0.6x = 0.6x * 1.8\)

Now, we are given that difference between clock's original price and clock's buy back price = \(100\)

\(x - 0.6x = 100\) i.e. \(x = 250\)

We are asked to find the price at which the store resells the clock = \(0.6x * 1.8 = 0.6 * 250 * 1.8 = 270\)

Hope this helps

Regards Harsh

Dear,

I have a basic question.

The author states: "The shop then sold the clock again at a profit of 80 percent on its buy-back price". Why is it suppose to multiply 0.6x*1.8? I think my confuse is related to the profit concept. For me, if I buy something at 100, and the cost of it is 80. I have a profit of 20/100 = 20%. Using the same logic on the question, if I buy something at 100 and I get a profit of 80%, the sales price must be 100/0.2. Thus, it is 500. Profit is 400/500=80%. It is a totally different aproach than to say 100*1,8.

The question is a bit wordy and gives us a series of percentages on which we need to work on. Going step wise is the key to not miss out on any of the information. Presenting the detailed step wise solution

Step-I- Store buys the clock Let's assume the original price of clock paid by the store to be \(x\)

Step-II- Collectors buys the clock from the store Extra amount paid by collector to buy the clock = \(20\)% of \(x\)

Therefore price at which collector buys the clock = \(x + 20\)% of \(x = 1.2x\)

Step-III- Store buys back the clock from collector Price at which the store buys the clock = \(50\)% of price collector paid \(= 50\)% of \(1.2x = 0.6x\)

Step-IV- Store resells the clock Price at which store resells the clock = \(0.6x + 80\)% of \(0.6x = 0.6x * 1.8\)

Now, we are given that difference between clock's original price and clock's buy back price = \(100\)

\(x - 0.6x = 100\) i.e. \(x = 250\)

We are asked to find the price at which the store resells the clock = \(0.6x * 1.8 = 0.6 * 250 * 1.8 = 270\)

Hope this helps

Regards Harsh

Dear,

I have a basic question.

The author states: "The shop then sold the clock again at a profit of 80 percent on its buy-back price". Why is it suppose to multiply 0.6x*1.8? I think my confuse is related to the profit concept. For me, if I buy something at 100, and the cost of it is 80. I have a profit of 20/100 = 20%. Using the same logic on the question, if I buy something at 100 and I get a profit of 80%, the sales price must be 100/0.2. Thus, it is 500. Profit is 400/500=80%. It is a totally different aproach than to say 100*1,8.

Where my confuse is?

Kind regards... Gonzalo

Gonzalo, Profit is calculated = Selling price - Cost price. Profit % is always calculated on the cost price of the purchase and not on the selling price. You are calculating profit % on the selling price. This is where you are going wrong. I am assuming that in your example, you are buying something at 80 while you are selling it at 100, giving you an absolute profit of 20$ while your profit % will be 20/80 = 25% and not 20/100 = 20%.

Now, in the question above, lets say the original cost of the clock to store was C$ and then it sold the same to the collector at 20% profit. This means the clocks' selling price was C (1.2) and this becomes cost price for the collector. Now, when the collector tries to sell the same clock to the store, the store buys it for 50% the price at which the collector bought it.

Thus, you get = 1.2*0.5*C = 0.6 C

Furthermore, the store sells the clock for the second time for 80% profit and thus the selling price of the clock becomes = cost price of the clock for the store at buy-back * 1.8 = 1.8 * 0.6 C

Finally given that C - 0.6 C = 100 ----> C = 250$

Thus, the cost of the clock the second time around = 1.8*0.6 C = 1.8 * 0.6 * 250 = 270$. Hence A is the correct answer.
_________________

Re: A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 per [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jul 2015, 14:20

Engr2012 wrote:

gbascurs wrote:

EgmatQuantExpert wrote:

The question is a bit wordy and gives us a series of percentages on which we need to work on. Going step wise is the key to not miss out on any of the information. Presenting the detailed step wise solution

Step-I- Store buys the clock Let's assume the original price of clock paid by the store to be \(x\)

Step-II- Collectors buys the clock from the store Extra amount paid by collector to buy the clock = \(20\)% of \(x\)

Therefore price at which collector buys the clock = \(x + 20\)% of \(x = 1.2x\)

Step-III- Store buys back the clock from collector Price at which the store buys the clock = \(50\)% of price collector paid \(= 50\)% of \(1.2x = 0.6x\)

Step-IV- Store resells the clock Price at which store resells the clock = \(0.6x + 80\)% of \(0.6x = 0.6x * 1.8\)

Now, we are given that difference between clock's original price and clock's buy back price = \(100\)

\(x - 0.6x = 100\) i.e. \(x = 250\)

We are asked to find the price at which the store resells the clock = \(0.6x * 1.8 = 0.6 * 250 * 1.8 = 270\)

Hope this helps

Regards Harsh

Dear,

I have a basic question.

The author states: "The shop then sold the clock again at a profit of 80 percent on its buy-back price". Why is it suppose to multiply 0.6x*1.8? I think my confuse is related to the profit concept. For me, if I buy something at 100, and the cost of it is 80. I have a profit of 20/100 = 20%. Using the same logic on the question, if I buy something at 100 and I get a profit of 80%, the sales price must be 100/0.2. Thus, it is 500. Profit is 400/500=80%. It is a totally different aproach than to say 100*1,8.

Where my confuse is?

Kind regards... Gonzalo

Gonzalo, Profit is calculated = Selling price - Cost price. Profit % is always calculated on the cost price of the purchase and not on the selling price. You are calculating profit % on the selling price. This is where you are going wrong. I am assuming that in your example, you are buying something at 80 while you are selling it at 100, giving you an absolute profit of 20$ while your profit % will be 20/80 = 25% and not 20/100 = 20%.

Now, in the question above, lets say the original cost of the clock to store was C$ and then it sold the same to the collector at 20% profit. This means the clocks' selling price was C (1.2) and this becomes cost price for the collector. Now, when the collector tries to sell the same clock to the store, the store buys it for 50% the price at which the collector bought it.

Thus, you get = 1.2*0.5*C = 0.6 C

Furthermore, the store sells the clock for the second time for 80% profit and thus the selling price of the clock becomes = cost price of the clock for the store at buy-back * 1.8 = 1.8 * 0.6 C

Finally given that C - 0.6 C = 100 ----> C = 250$

Thus, the cost of the clock the second time around = 1.8*0.6 C = 1.8 * 0.6 * 250 = 270$. Hence A is the correct answer.

Thank you a lot.

Here is the key of my misunderstanding: "Profit % is always calculated on the cost price of the purchase". I assumed it was on the sales price.

A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 percent more than the store had originally paid for the clock. When the collector tried to resell the clock to the store, the store bought it back at 50 percent of what the collector had paid. The shop then sold the clock again at a profit of 80 percent on its buy-back price. If the difference between the clock's original cost to the shop and the clock's buy-back price was $100, for how much did the shop sell the clock the second time?

A. $270 B. $250 C. $240 D. $220 E. $200

Let us assume the initial price (CP) of the clock to be 100x We assume 100x to avoid the usage of decimals in case of x and avoid the usage of unitary method in case of 100

Transaction 1: Store sold the clock to collector. Selling Price = 20% more than CP = 120x

Transaction 2: The collector sold it back to the store. The new CP for the store = 60x (Store bought it back for 50% of the Selling Price)

Transaction 3: Store sold it back at a profit of 80% on 60x = 108x

Now we are told that 100x - 60x = 100 This means x = 100/40

Hence the second selling price = 108*100/40 = 270 Option A
_________________

Re: A clock store sold a certain clock to a collector for 20 per [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Dec 2016, 05:41

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...