It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 19:50

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A company's two division performed with remarkable

Author Message
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 572

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC
A company's two division performed with remarkable [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2005, 15:18
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:28) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A company's two division performed with remarkable consistency over the past 3 yrs. In each of those years, the pharmaceuticals division has accounted for roughly 20 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of profits, and the chemicals division for the balance.

Which of the followng can be inferred regarding the past 3 yrs from the statement above?

1. Total dollar sales for each company's division have remained roughly constant.

2. The pharmaceuticals division has faced stiffer competition in its markets than has chemical division.

3. The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceutical division

4. The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remained unchanged.

5. Highly profitable products accounted for higher percentage of the chemical division's sales than of those of pharmaceutical division.
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1708

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2005, 20:02
3. The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceutical division

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 572

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2005, 02:00
HIMALAYA wrote:
3. The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceutical division

can u explain ur answer.. i wasnt convinced with OG's answer. i thought the wording way way too ambiguous
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2005, 02:59
its 3

since sales for chemical division is 80% and profits 60% both as a percentage of the total

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2005, 07:32
3. The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceutical division

example would be better for this one:
total sales = 100
P = 20
C = 80

profit, suppose = 30
P = 40% of 30= 12
C = 60% of 30 = 18

now, profits per dollar of sales
for P = 12/20=60%
for C = 18/80=22.5%

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2005, 09:54

Sales of P is 20%, but profit is 40%. Means C's is 80%, but profit is 60%. The ratio of profit to sales is higher for than for C.

A company's two division performed with remarkable consistency over the past 3 yrs. In each of those years, the pharmaceuticals division has accounted for roughly 20 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of profits, and the chemicals division for the balance

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1050

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2005, 17:08
Quote:
the pharmaceuticals division has accounted for roughly 20 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of profits, and the chemicals division for the balance

Pharm = 20% of revenue, 40% of profits
Chem = 80% of revenue but only 60% of profits

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 572

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2005, 19:57
u guys are good.. I would have never been able to guess this answer in 100 yrs..
"the chemical part, accounts for the balance" threw me off.. i didnt had a clue wat it meant..
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1700

Kudos [?]: 474 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2005, 06:01
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 474 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2005, 08:06
IAMARYAL wrote:
3. The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceutical division

example would be better for this one:
total sales = 100
P = 20
C = 80

profit, suppose = 30
P = 40% of 30= 12
C = 60% of 30 = 18

now, profits per dollar of sales
for P = 12/20=60%
for C = 18/80=22.5%

Unquestionably (C). Here`s the proof

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Re: CR +OG   [#permalink] 13 Dec 2005, 08:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A company's two division performed with remarkable

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.