It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 03:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Posts: 159

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 5

A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2009, 10:54
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:34) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 10 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

5. A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive and aggressive antismoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole.

B. annual per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs to about 60, more than twice as great as that
C. California's annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop
D. California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that
E. California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that



I'm confused between choices D and E? Pl. discuss......

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 5

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 476

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 12

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.9
Re: Brutal SCs - no. 5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2009, 18:07
This is tricky. I think D and E are both gramatically correct but that (E) is more precise (yet it also doesn't have a drop which makes it sound a bit strange). I'll go with E and hope that I'm right. :roll:

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 12

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 1

Location: India
Re: Brutal SCs - no. 5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2009, 20:34
gmatprep09 wrote:
5. A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive and aggressive antismoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole.

B. annual per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs to about 60, more than twice as great as that
C. California's annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop
D. California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that
E. California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that



I'm confused between choices D and E? Pl. discuss......


Man you made hell of the question :(
It's not clear what this question is asking. Please underline it.

a drop is more precise than starting with more than.

I will go with D, it correctly modifies decline.

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 277

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

Re: Brutal SCs - no. 5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2009, 07:23
Both C and E are wrong, becoz percapita already means per person.. wrong for redundancy.
A is wrong for the improper comparision..

now btw B and D,

though D is more direct, it has the appositive written correctly..

i will go with D..

whats the OA ?

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1282

Kudos [?]: 1245 [0], given: 157

Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Brutal SCs - no. 5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2009, 11:31
Neochronic wrote:
Both C and E are wrong, becoz percapita already means per person.. wrong for redundancy.
A is wrong for the improper comparision..

now btw B and D,

though D is more direct, it has the appositive written correctly..

i will go with D..

whats the OA ?


You are absolutely right!! :) I had the same reason of redundancy for "E" but you highlighted the appositive part in "D" too. Thanks for that!

OA is "D" :)
_________________

[ From 470 to 680-My Story ] [ My Last Month Before Test ]
[ GMAT Prep Analysis Tool ] [ US. Business School Dashboard ] [ Int. Business School Dashboard ]

I Can, I Will

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1245 [0], given: 157

Re: Brutal SCs - no. 5   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2009, 11:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A decade after initiating the nation's most comprehensive

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.