NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 09:04 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 09:04
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
noboru
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 543
Own Kudos [?]: 8532 [30]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools:CBS
 Q50  V37
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Send PM
A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 01 Feb 2020, 04:17
3
Kudos
27
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (02:19) correct 46% (02:23) wrong based on 967 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the North Sea to die since May 1988. The explanation for the deaths cannot rest here, however. There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly: clearly the severe pollution of the North Sea waters must have weakened the immune system of the seals so that they could no longer withstand the virus.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the explanation given in the argument?


(A) At various times during the last ten years, several species of shellfish and seabirds in the North Sea have experienced unprecedented steep drops in population.

(B) By reducing pollution at its source, Northern Europe and Scandinavia have been taking the lead in preventing pollution from reaching the waters of the North Sea.

(C) For many years, fish for human consumption have been taken from the waters of the North Sea.

(D) There are two species of seal found throughout the North Sea area, the common seal and the gray seal.

(E) The distemper caused by the virus was a disease that was new to the population of North Sea seals in May 1988, and so the seals’ immune systems were unprepared to counter it.



Same passage with different stem question: LINK
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A

Originally posted by noboru on 29 May 2010, 09:42.
Last edited by Bunuel on 01 Feb 2020, 04:17, edited 3 times in total.
Reformatted question, OA added
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
nightblade354
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Posts: 1734
Own Kudos [?]: 5734 [11]
Given Kudos: 3054
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Darden '25 (M)
Send PM
A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   06 Feb 2020, 06:13
7
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the North Sea to die since May 1988. The explanation for the deaths cannot rest here, however. There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly: clearly the severe pollution of the North Sea waters must have weakened the immune system of the seals so that they could no longer withstand the virus.

P: There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly: clearly the severe pollution of the North Sea waters must have weakened the immune system of the seals so that they could no longer withstand the virus.
C: The explanation for the deaths cannot rest here, however

We are trying to show that a standard virus alone did not cause the deaths of all of the seals; we want to strengthen the idea that pollution, in some way, harmed their immune systems.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the explanation given in the argument?


(A) At various times during the last ten years, several species of shellfish and seabirds in the North Sea have experienced unprecedented steep drops in population. -- At first glance, this seems like an easy elimination because it talks about other animals over the decade. And that is the way you should approach this answer choice. However, once you have eliminated every other answer choice, this one stands above the rest. It is tricky because this does, indeed, strengthen our conclusion in a weak way. It shows other species going through the same process in the same area during a similar time period. And while it is a weak strengthener, it does show that this is not standalone event with the seals. There are other drops that are unexpected, meaning it can't just be the virus that has been around for a while; something else needs to be helping it. And that is why this is the correct answer. I, as stated above, will admit there is room for assumption on this (something you should never do). In all honestly, I eliminated this and then came back after going through B - E. There is no shame in doing that as long as you get the right answer!

(B) By reducing pollution at its source, Northern Europe and Scandinavia have been taking the lead in preventing pollution from reaching the waters of the North Sea. -- OK, so what? At best, this is an irrelevant comment because we do not care who is taking a lead to preventing pollution (Have they actually prevented pollution? How much have they saved?). At worst, this goes against our conclusion that pollution is the cause.

(C) For many years, fish for human consumption have been taken from the waters of the North Sea. -- OK, but who cares? Do the seals eat these fish (assumption we cannot make)? Have humans made such a large impact that the seals cannot survive (assumption we cannot make)? In the end, this is trying to make you think about biology and the real world. But do not bring that knowledge into a question!

(D) There are two species of seal found throughout the North Sea area, the common seal and the gray seal. -- OK, and? We have two species. This answer choice my as well have said that our seals have pink polka-dots. This information doesn't help us in any way solve the problem of whether pollution is causing our issue. If you thought that two seal populations means that one isn't effected, you have made an error as all seals are effected. Further, I think you may have lost site of the premise-conclusion relationship.

(E) The distemper caused by the virus was a disease that was new to the population of North Sea seals in May 1988, and so the seals’ immune systems were unprepared to counter it. -- This WEAKENS our conclusion. This does not strengthen it, and I am saddened that so many fell for this old trick (literally the oldest trick in the GMAT play book). You will usually see a strengthener in a weaken question, and a weakener in a strengthen question. This says that it is not the pollution, but the virus itself because it is new. Well, you just disproved our entire argument that it is pollution.
User avatar
L
Bunuel
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618763 [0]
Given Kudos: 81587
Send PM
CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   01 Mar 2021, 04:45
Expert Reply
noboru wrote:
A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the North Sea to die since May 1988. The explanation for the deaths cannot rest here, however. There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly: clearly the severe pollution of the North Sea waters must have weakened the immune system of the seals so that they could no longer withstand the virus.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the explanation given in the argument?


(A) At various times during the last ten years, several species of shellfish and seabirds in the North Sea have experienced unprecedented steep drops in population.

(B) By reducing pollution at its source, Northern Europe and Scandinavia have been taking the lead in preventing pollution from reaching the waters of the North Sea.

(C) For many years, fish for human consumption have been taken from the waters of the North Sea.

(D) There are two species of seal found throughout the North Sea area, the common seal and the gray seal.

(E) The distemper caused by the virus was a disease that was new to the population of North Sea seals in May 1988, and so the seals’ immune systems were unprepared to counter it.



Same passage with different stem question: LINK


Official Explanation



(A) Yes. Since presumably the distemper virus that affects seals would not affect such disparate animals as shellfish and seabirds, it is likely that another agent caused all three populations to decrease—pollution.

(B) No. This would weaken the argument. If pollution is being reduced, then pollution is less likely now to be the cause of the weakening of the seals’ immune system than in the past.

(C) No. We don’t know how this has affected the immune system of humans. If humans are becoming more susceptible to similar viruses, then it would support the argument. However, if humans are not becoming more susceptible to similar viruses, then it would weaken the argument.

(D) No. This is irrelevant. The passage is about the general population of seals. We don’t need to know the distribution of the various species.

(E) No. This would weaken the argument. If the seals’ immune system were unprepared for the new strain of virus, then the spread of the virus probably would have occurred even without the pollution
General Discussion
User avatar
Rajen
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   03 Jun 2010, 23:53
A

(A) At various times during the last ten years, several species of shellfish and seabirds in the North Sea have experienced unprecedented steep drops in population --> In argument “There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly” explains that there is something else in north sea causing deaths of shellfish (Pollution). This to some extent supports the argument
(B) By reducing pollution at its source, Northern Europe and Scandinavia have been taking the lead in preventing pollution from reaching the waters of the North Sea --> weaken
(C) For many years, fish for human consumption have been taken from the waters of the North Sea --> weaken by countering the argument with another reason
(D) There are two species of seal found throughout the North Sea area, the common seal and the gray seal --> out of scope
(E) The distemper caused by the virus was a disease that was new to the population of North Sea seals in May 1988, and so the seals’ immune systems were ..” --- >weaken
User avatar
GMATPASSION
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Status:Retaking next month
Affiliations: None
Posts: 105
Own Kudos [?]: 752 [0]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 3.01
WE:Sales (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   27 Sep 2011, 21:30
Best is A

1)Supports: Pollution is causing others sea creatures to die as well
2) Weakens
3)Out of Scope
4)Out of Scope
5) Weakens

So Something that doesn't weakens is kind of neutral or may be supporting the Explanation.

No where it is told that we would get a perfect answer in answer choices. Relatively better is Good to choose.

Doesn't this resembles our day to day lives. We take decisions based on which is a better choice.Perfection is not always required. :wink:
User avatar
B
YangYichen
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 161 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE:Sales (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   16 Oct 2016, 08:03
is there anything to do with "At various times during the last ten years" I mean the past thing can have no effect on present phenomena
User avatar
G
sayantanc2k
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   16 Oct 2016, 11:21
Expert Reply
YangYichen wrote:
is there anything to do with "At various times during the last ten years" I mean the past thing can have no effect on present phenomena


Unless the year when the statement is made is known, the phrase "At various times during the last ten years" does not have a role. The sentence would be more meaningful, if it were something like "during the same period".
User avatar
L
arvind910619
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   14 Oct 2017, 07:05
noboru wrote:
A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the North Sea to die since May 1988. The explanation for the deaths cannot rest here, however. There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly: clearly the severe pollution of the North Sea waters must have weakened the immune system of the seals so that they could no longer withstand the virus.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the explanation given in the argument?

(A) At various times during the last ten years, several species of shellfish and seabirds in the North Sea have experienced unprecedented steep drops in population.

(B) By reducing pollution at its source, Northern Europe and Scandinavia have been taking the lead in preventing pollution from reaching the waters of the North Sea.

(C) For many years, fish for human consumption have been taken from the waters of the North Sea.

(D) There are two species of seal found throughout the North Sea area, the common seal and the gray seal.

(E) The distemper caused by the virus was a disease that was new to the population of North Sea seals in May 1988, and so the seals’ immune systems were unprepared to counter it.

Source: LSAT

Same passage with different stem question: LINK


Hi folks ,

I think the answer is A
A virus has caused the seal population to decline in north sea since may 1988 ans the decline was because of the immune system weakened by the severe pollution of the north sea.
This is a very tough problem but A provides a loose hint that strengthens the argument by giving us examples of other animals who also have suffered severe population decline .
Now the severe pollution of the north sea will affect every animal living in the zone and dependent on the north sea .So this is our strengthener

E on the other hand describes a story that does not affect the conclusion of the argument .I tells us that the virus was not native to the north sea and therefore immune system of the seals was not ready to fight the disease.It changes the reasoning of the argument .We may not know if seals will encounter the disease once if they have suffered from the disease .
So it does not strengthen the argument .
User avatar
L
GmatKnightTutor
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 4412
Own Kudos [?]: 1304 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   04 Mar 2020, 07:58
This was an interesting question. I do wonder, however, how people were so certain the "explanation" given in the argument referred to the author's.

There are in fact TWO explanations given in this argument:

General: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the North Sea to die since May 1988

Author's: There must be a reason the normally latent virus could prevail so suddenly: clearly the severe pollution of the North Sea waters must have weakened the immune system of the seals so that they could no longer withstand the virus.

The only explanation that is specified is the former. "The explanation for the deaths cannot rest here, however. " Perhaps that is a bit too literal for CR, though. I guess an argument= refers to the author's view by default.
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink] New post   11 Dec 2023, 20:18
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: A distemper virus has caused two-thirds of the seal population in the [#permalink]
11 Dec 2023, 20:18
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions