honey1 wrote:
as my weakest subject is verbal ability i want your precious help
in this question how would i know why option a is wrong and why d is also wrong. can you plz elaborate it in details
thanks
Hey, I'll try to help you.
The question asks for conclusion i.e. something that you can deduce from the passage which may/may not be implicitly stated.
So the knowledge is restricted to the passage and no outside information/assumption is allowed.
The flow of the passage goes as follows :
Judge says :
1) a trained and well experienced judge is well-equipped to decide if any govt. decision is reasonable.
2) if a trained judge cannot decide, means its the fault of the legal system (not the judge, he is skilled ---> this you imply)
3) Now, he says that there is little reason to suppose that there is anything wrong with the legal system
So, what should be the next sentence of the judge? ---> That's your conclusion. Why is the judge saying all this ?
Clearly, judge intends to say that since nothing is really wrong with the legal system, point (1) must be true. The flow of the passage is necessarily EITHER A OR B.
Thus, its either judges are qualified, or legal system sucks(which again implies that judges are nevertheless skilled, so either way judges are no doubt the qualified guys). So clearly, judges are qualified.
That's your answer option C.Also note, D is straight out since it shows a conditional statement IF..ELSE. The author is CONCLUDING something. That needs to be a sure shot answer. Not a conditional, which may go either way depending on the condition.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Saakhi