GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2018, 00:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 21
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2013, 13:08
icandy wrote:
ConkergMat wrote:
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good imitator’s rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

Please explain your answers, especially the 2 contenders.


The only one that made sense is E.

Conc is "advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators"

Negate E

The advertising industry will NOT use well-known renditions of songs in commercials. If they do not use the well known renditions of songs, there is no guarantee that the cost of advertising will go up.




I have an issue with E - it says "(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials."

First of all, I believe this is worded incorrectly; it should be "renditions of well-known songs". Secondly, the famous singers can still sue if they are imitating un-known songs by those famous singers. The copyright to the songs do still exist. Am I looking too much into this??? Anyone?
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Status: Back to work...
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 5668
Location: India
City: Pune
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2013, 08:26
1
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 151
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 29 Jun 2013, 04:37
I need to reverse the option (C) to understand the negation tech ..please help


(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.


Will it be
i) The original versions of none of the well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
=> All the songs are available

ii) The original versions of some of the well-known songs are not unavailable for use in commercials.
=> Few well unknown songs are available
_________________

If u can't jump the 700 wall , drill a big hole and cross it .. I can and I WILL DO IT ...need some encouragement and inspirations from U ALL


Originally posted by BukrsGmat on 29 Jun 2013, 04:33.
Last edited by Zarrolou on 29 Jun 2013, 04:37, edited 1 time in total.
Merging similar topics.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 755
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2014, 22:34
Though my doubt might be silly, I want to ask what is wrong with (C).

(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.

OE:
C The lack of availability of some songs is not relevant to the rise in advertising costs.The same songs would not have been available even when production costs were lower

So, it is the above explanation which is 100% correct or it is the difference between rendition and song that plays some role.

Further to it,

I could say that if original versions of some well-known songs are available for use then advertising costs won't increase.

So what is the issue with the above.

(1). The use of 'some' and not 'all'.
(2). Usage of term 'song' and not 'rendition'.
(3). The one stated in OE as if this would have been the case then there was no logic of imitating the original artists, we could have used the available songs.

So all are the issues or only the one stated in OE?

Rgds,
TGC!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 426
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2016, 01:26
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers' services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

This one is the assumption question. Normally, when we try to solve any assumption question, then it comes some possible challenges in our head. does the possible challenge weaken the argument?
does the below weaken the argument?
>>The industry will use something different criteria for advertising, which costs the low cost than the famous singer.
>>There are some workers (they are paid only as a worker not for singing song) in this industry who sings exactly like the famous singer and they’ll be used for advertisement.
Thanks...
_________________

“The heights by great men reached and kept were not attained in sudden flight but, they while their companions slept, they were toiling upwards in the night.”
― Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 35
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2018, 07:57
It very tricky for me. i just guje.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2018, 10:47
right, knowing vocabulary is important in gmat. I do not know the word "Rendition" in E so I could not catch the main idea of the argument. E is truly the answer.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Nov 2016
Posts: 66
Location: India
Reviews Badge
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2018, 07:28
Hello Verbal Experts (GmatNinja, Daagh, egmat, magoosh),
How can we eliminate opt A here?
Could you please explain the same.
Thanks,
Sid Jain.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 426
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2018, 14:08
SidJainGMAT wrote:
Hello Verbal Experts (GmatNinja, Daagh, egmat, magoosh),
How can we eliminate opt A here?
Could you please explain the same.
Thanks,
Sid Jain.


Hey, i don't care "what people do here"- this one is all about the cost. So, i have to say something that will help to rise cost. Option A doesn't rise cost anyway!
Now wait for experts' response, please.


Sent from my iPad using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

“The heights by great men reached and kept were not attained in sudden flight but, they while their companions slept, they were toiling upwards in the night.”
― Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 383
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 07:19
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers' services cost more than those of their imitators.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials

Conclusion is : Advertising costs will rise, since famous singers' services cost more than those of their imitators.

Why Advertising cost will rise ?
Answer: because famous singers cost more.

Why do we need famous singers.
Answer: Because industry will use famous songs in commercials.

Answer to CR is "E"
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an &nbs [#permalink] 14 Jul 2018, 07:19

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.