It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 03:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A government agency publishes ratings of airlines, ranking

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 152

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: India
A government agency publishes ratings of airlines, ranking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2004, 10:02
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A government agency publishes ratings of airlines, ranking highest the airlines that have the smallest proportion of late flights. The agency┬б┬пs purpose is to establish an objective measure of the relative efficiency of different airlines' personnel in meeting published flight schedules.

Which one of the following, if true, would tend to invalidate use of the ratings for the agency's purpose?

(A) Travelers sometimes have no choice of airlines for a given trip at a given time.

(B) Flights are often made late by bad weather conditions that affect some airlines more that others.

(C) The flight schedules of all airlines allow extra time for flights that go into or out of very busy airports.

(D) Airline personnel are aware that the government agency is monitoring all airline flights for lateness.

(E) Flights are defined as 'late' only if they arrive more that fifteen minutes past their scheduled arrival time, and a record is made of how much alter than fifteen minutes they are.
_________________

A 750 aspirant.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2004, 11:41
B looks fine to me.

The efficiency of personnel has no effect if the airline they operate is severly affected by the weather if those personnel are very efficient.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2004, 12:10
B also. To add to Anandnk, B says that bad weather conditions affect some airlines more that others, thus rendering unfair the judgement layed upon affected airlines; personel will not be the cause of the delay and the "relative efficiency of different airlines' personnel" will be invalidated
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 152

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2004, 12:22
In that case, would choice validate the argument?
_________________

A 750 aspirant.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2004, 12:36
aspire wrote:
In that case, would choice validate the argument?

I think there is a typo or an omission in your question
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2004, 12:49
The use of ratings is not for the public but for the agency's use. So what people choose has no bearing on the ratings unless more information about size of the airlines is given.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: A government agency publishes ratings of airlines, ranking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 03:19
B looks good to me, too. I will go with B

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: A government agency publishes ratings of airlines, ranking   [#permalink] 15 Apr 2016, 03:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by