GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2019, 18:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 179
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2010, 01:58
5
17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:42) correct 32% (01:58) wrong based on 823 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the agency’s plan?

(A) Daycares typically hold parents responsible for the ultimate payment of their bills.
(B) The agency cannot save money by cutting staff because it is already understaffed.
(C) Some clients borrow money to pay their daycare bills and they will pay forty extra days of interest on these loans.
(D) Some clients pay their daycare bills immediately, but they often taken more than forty days to file with the agency for reimbursement.
(E) The agency’s budget was cut by more than $180 million last year.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Posts: 14
Re: harming clients financially  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2010, 03:09
2
1
IMO C.
Critic will most try to find a flaw here.

Since agency claims that delaying reimbursements will help the agency earn money, claim C says the reverse.
Interest means extra charge. Lets say, if a person actually had to pay 100$, due to the interest, he will now claim for (100$+interest amount say 10$ = 110$) thus more money will be claimed. Hence this is the best argument against the agency's claim.
GMAT Tutor
avatar
G
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1806
Re: harming clients financially  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2010, 16:07
2
1
feruz77 wrote:
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the agency’s plan?

(A) Daycares typically hold parents responsible for the ultimate payment of their bills.
(B) The agency cannot save money by cutting staff because it is already understaffed.
(C) Some clients borrow money to pay their daycare bills and they will pay forty extra days of interest on these loans.
(D) Some clients pay their daycare bills immediately, but they often taken more than forty days to file with the agency for reimbursement.
(E) The agency’s budget was cut by more than $180 million last year.


The answer is C because of the portion I've highlighted above. If C is true, the plan *will* harm clients financially, so the plan will not achieve one of its goals.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 9
Re: harming clients financially  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2010, 13:20
1
I understand why C is correct. It was my first choice..

But I don't understand why E is wrong!! If the budget is cut by more than 180 million, the plan will not work anyway..no?

Please help!!
Knewton GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 14
Re: harming clients financially  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2010, 10:00
1
@maive, it's great that C was your first choice and that you got this one correct! The problem with E is that it doesn't have any to do with causing financial harm to clients.

We're specifically told in the argument that the purpose of the plan is to avoid cutting reimbursements or harming clients financially. Even if the budget was cut by more than $180 million last year (the amount that they expect to earn back in interest with the new plan), there are still other things the agency could to save money without harming clients financially (cut employee salaries, move into cheaper office space, etc.)

Only answer choice C states that the forty-day delay will cause financial harm to some clients, so that's the best criticism of the plan.

Hope that helps!
_________________
Jen Rugani
GMAT Instructor
Knewton, Inc.

Sign up with Knewton and get all GMAT Club tests for free

Image
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 111
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Re: harming clients financially  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2010, 05:34
Quote:
maive:- But I don't understand why E is wrong!! If the budget is cut by more than 180 million, the plan will not work anyway..no?



I believe this is since E is not dampening the main concerns. The stated main concerns are- not to harm clients financially and cost cutting.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: folding sleeves up
Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 121
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 530 Q39 V23
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Computer Hardware)
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2014, 22:01
How can we assume that the government will pay for the interest (as per option C) when the premise states "A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care". It says only bills not about the interest on the another loan taken in the mean time.

Please help me to understand this
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 268
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2014, 06:57
1
1
email2vm

you have not understood option "c'' correctly........
what it means is as follows....

- I incur $1000 on medical expenses and take a loan for payment of same.......
- After 40 days i am reimbursed $ 1000 by the government agency.....which i use to repay my loan... but the borrower asks for $ 1100 (loan amount + interest on loan)
- I have to pay additional $ 100 from my pocket.....hence the argument that no affect of the new system accrues on the me ( ie citizen) is incorrect.....


HENCE "C" CORRECT....


Kudos if you please...............
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 63
Schools: Haas '16, AGSM '16
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2015, 20:39
1
Type weaken

Conclusion: delay in reimbursments would not harm clients financially.

Assumption: delay in reimbursments would not harm clients financially.

Weaken the assumption: Reimbursment harm the financial status of clients somehow

A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 17 May 2015
Posts: 27
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2015, 01:21
IanStewart wrote:
feruz77 wrote:
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the agency’s plan?

(A) Daycares typically hold parents responsible for the ultimate payment of their bills.
(B) The agency cannot save money by cutting staff because it is already understaffed.
(C) Some clients borrow money to pay their daycare bills and they will pay forty extra days of interest on these loans.
(D) Some clients pay their daycare bills immediately, but they often taken more than forty days to file with the agency for reimbursement.
(E) The agency’s budget was cut by more than $180 million last year.


The answer is C because of the portion I've highlighted above. If C is true, the plan *will* harm clients financially, so the plan will not achieve one of its goals.



What category does this come under like cause and effect or alternate cause or numbers and percentage. I cant seem to see what pattern this fall under?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Posts: 182
GMAT Date: 08-04-2015
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2015, 02:03
Quote:
What category does this come under like cause and effect or alternate cause or numbers and percentage. I cant seem to see what pattern this fall under?


I think this is a weaken question.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Feb 2014
Posts: 37
GPA: 3.33
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2016, 01:18
I was struggling to choose between C and D.
can anyone help me to explain why D is wrong?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2016, 09:23
tanzzt wrote:
I was struggling to choose between C and D.
can anyone help me to explain why D is wrong?


In option D it is implied that the clients already had money to pay the bills. Since they did not have to take loan to pay the bills, it does not matter whether there is a delay of 40 days in getting the payment because they do not have to pay interest on the money and their net cash flow is 0. They pay x for the bill, and receive x as reimbursement.

Option C clearly shows a loss for the client. They pay the bill x plus the interest on x, but get reimbursement of only x. So net cash out flow is the interest. Therefore option C is better since it shows that the government's intention of not harming the clients financially is not achieved.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 11
GMAT 1: 670 Q51 V30
GPA: 3
Reviews Badge
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2017, 11:51
1
C is correct choice.

We're specifically told in the argument that the purpose of the plan is to avoid cutting reimbursements or harming clients financially. Even if the budget was cut by more than $180 million last year (the amount that they expect to earn back in interest with the new plan), there are still other things the agency could to save money without harming clients financially (cut employee salaries, move into cheaper office space, etc.)

Only answer choice C states that the forty-day delay will cause financial harm to some clients, so that's the best criticism of the plan.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2019, 01:32
feruz77 wrote:
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the agency’s plan?

(A) Daycares typically hold parents responsible for the ultimate payment of their bills.
(B) The agency cannot save money by cutting staff because it is already understaffed.
(C) Some clients borrow money to pay their daycare bills and they will pay forty extra days of interest on these loans.
(D) Some clients pay their daycare bills immediately, but they often taken more than forty days to file with the agency for reimbursement.
(E) The agency’s budget was cut by more than $180 million last year.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



With a view to offset the budgetary cut that it had faced, the government agency plans to earn an interest of $180 million a year through a deliberate delay in the reimbursement of daycare expenses to its clients by forty days.

It claims that, by implementing this plan, it would neither cut reimbursements nor otherwise harm its clients financially.

We have been asked to identify that choice which can be described as the best criticism of the agency’s plan.

Since the agency’s claim is that its plan will neither result in cutting reimbursements nor otherwise harming its clients financially, we should look for that choice which implies either that the reimbursement is in fact reduced, or that the clients are otherwise financially harmed by this plan.

The first sentence of the passage specifically states that the schemes of reimbursement means that the clients have to first pay the bills to the daycares, and only later can claim reimbursement from the government agency. So, (A) states the obvious, and is not relevant in evaluating the effect of the delay in reimbursement by 40 days. So, (A) is not the answer.

(B) means that the agency is not in a position to save on its administrative costs. This, if true, will justify, and weaken, the agency’s plan to make savings through other means such as a deliberate delay in making reimbursements and earning interest thereby. So, (B) is not the answer.

(C) means that these clients will be financially harmed by the planned delay by the government agency in reimbursing their claims, thereby contradicting its claim that the plan would not harm its clients financially. So, (C) would be the best criticism of the agency’s plan, and is the answer.

(D) only means that, in respect of such delayed claims, the agency has already been benefiting by interest-earning.

Therefore (D), by itself, does not constitute a criticism of the agency’s present plan to delay reimbursement of claims by another forty days.

The given passage does not claim that the interest of $180 million earned by the deliberate delay in the reimbursement of claims was intended to cover the budget cut fully. So, (E) even if it is true, is not a valid criticism of the agency’s plan.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills   [#permalink] 04 Jul 2019, 01:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne