It is currently 10 Dec 2017, 19:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 866 [2], given: 974

Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2010, 01:58
2
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:27) correct 37% (01:32) wrong based on 875 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the agency’s plan?

(A) Daycares typically hold parents responsible for the ultimate payment of their bills.
(B) The agency cannot save money by cutting staff because it is already understaffed.
(C) Some clients borrow money to pay their daycare bills and they will pay forty extra days of interest on these loans.
(D) Some clients pay their daycare bills immediately, but they often taken more than forty days to file with the agency for reimbursement.
(E) The agency’s budget was cut by more than \$180 million last year.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 866 [2], given: 974

Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 12 [1], given: 3

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2010, 03:09
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
IMO C.
Critic will most try to find a flaw here.

Since agency claims that delaying reimbursements will help the agency earn money, claim C says the reverse.
Interest means extra charge. Lets say, if a person actually had to pay 100\$, due to the interest, he will now claim for (100\$+interest amount say 10\$ = 110\$) thus more money will be claimed. Hence this is the best argument against the agency's claim.

Kudos [?]: 12 [1], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2010, 10:31
IMO C

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 12

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1626

Kudos [?]: 1137 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2010, 12:57
+1 c
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1137 [0], given: 109

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1347

Kudos [?]: 2037 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2010, 16:07
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
feruz77 wrote:
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the agency’s plan?

(A) Daycares typically hold parents responsible for the ultimate payment of their bills.
(B) The agency cannot save money by cutting staff because it is already understaffed.
(C) Some clients borrow money to pay their daycare bills and they will pay forty extra days of interest on these loans.
(D) Some clients pay their daycare bills immediately, but they often taken more than forty days to file with the agency for reimbursement.
(E) The agency’s budget was cut by more than \$180 million last year.

The answer is C because of the portion I've highlighted above. If C is true, the plan *will* harm clients financially, so the plan will not achieve one of its goals.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 2037 [0], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 1

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 13:20
1
KUDOS
I understand why C is correct. It was my first choice..

But I don't understand why E is wrong!! If the budget is cut by more than 180 million, the plan will not work anyway..no?

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 1

Manager
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 238

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 30

Location: Chennai, India

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2010, 08:39
C +1
_________________

Gonna make it this time

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 30

Knewton GMAT Instructor
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2010, 10:00
1
KUDOS
@maive, it's great that C was your first choice and that you got this one correct! The problem with E is that it doesn't have any to do with causing financial harm to clients.

We're specifically told in the argument that the purpose of the plan is to avoid cutting reimbursements or harming clients financially. Even if the budget was cut by more than \$180 million last year (the amount that they expect to earn back in interest with the new plan), there are still other things the agency could to save money without harming clients financially (cut employee salaries, move into cheaper office space, etc.)

Only answer choice C states that the forty-day delay will cause financial harm to some clients, so that's the best criticism of the plan.

Hope that helps!
_________________

Jen Rugani
GMAT Instructor
Knewton, Inc.

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 173

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 20

Location: Zürich, Switzerland

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2010, 05:34
Quote:
maive:- But I don't understand why E is wrong!! If the budget is cut by more than 180 million, the plan will not work anyway..no?

I believe this is since E is not dampening the main concerns. The stated main concerns are- not to harm clients financially and cost cutting.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 20

Manager
Status: folding sleeves up
Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 39

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 530 Q39 V23
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Computer Hardware)
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2014, 22:01
How can we assume that the government will pay for the interest (as per option C) when the premise states "A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care". It says only bills not about the interest on the another loan taken in the mean time.

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 39

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 353

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 70

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2014, 06:57
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
email2vm

you have not understood option "c'' correctly........
what it means is as follows....

- I incur \$1000 on medical expenses and take a loan for payment of same.......
- After 40 days i am reimbursed \$ 1000 by the government agency.....which i use to repay my loan... but the borrower asks for \$ 1100 (loan amount + interest on loan)
- I have to pay additional \$ 100 from my pocket.....hence the argument that no affect of the new system accrues on the me ( ie citizen) is incorrect.....

HENCE "C" CORRECT....

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 70

Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 93

Kudos [?]: 26 [1], given: 13

Schools: Haas '16, AGSM '16
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2015, 20:39
1
KUDOS
Type weaken

Conclusion: delay in reimbursments would not harm clients financially.

Assumption: delay in reimbursments would not harm clients financially.

Weaken the assumption: Reimbursment harm the financial status of clients somehow

A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Kudos [?]: 26 [1], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 17 May 2015
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 166

Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2015, 01:21
IanStewart wrote:
feruz77 wrote:
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills they have paid for child care has had this year’s budget cut. To save money without cutting reimbursements or otherwise harming clients financially, it plans to delay reimbursements to clients for forty days, thereby earning 180 million per year in interest on the reimbursement money.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the agency’s plan?

(A) Daycares typically hold parents responsible for the ultimate payment of their bills.
(B) The agency cannot save money by cutting staff because it is already understaffed.
(C) Some clients borrow money to pay their daycare bills and they will pay forty extra days of interest on these loans.
(D) Some clients pay their daycare bills immediately, but they often taken more than forty days to file with the agency for reimbursement.
(E) The agency’s budget was cut by more than \$180 million last year.

The answer is C because of the portion I've highlighted above. If C is true, the plan *will* harm clients financially, so the plan will not achieve one of its goals.

What category does this come under like cause and effect or alternate cause or numbers and percentage. I cant seem to see what pattern this fall under?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 166

Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Posts: 215

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 75

GMAT Date: 08-04-2015
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2015, 02:03
Quote:
What category does this come under like cause and effect or alternate cause or numbers and percentage. I cant seem to see what pattern this fall under?

I think this is a weaken question.

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 75

Intern
Joined: 02 Feb 2014
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 35

GPA: 3.33
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2016, 01:18
I was struggling to choose between C and D.
can anyone help me to explain why D is wrong?

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 35

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3219

Kudos [?]: 3620 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2016, 09:23
tanzzt wrote:
I was struggling to choose between C and D.
can anyone help me to explain why D is wrong?

In option D it is implied that the clients already had money to pay the bills. Since they did not have to take loan to pay the bills, it does not matter whether there is a delay of 40 days in getting the payment because they do not have to pay interest on the money and their net cash flow is 0. They pay x for the bill, and receive x as reimbursement.

Option C clearly shows a loss for the client. They pay the bill x plus the interest on x, but get reimbursement of only x. So net cash out flow is the interest. Therefore option C is better since it shows that the government's intention of not harming the clients financially is not achieved.

Kudos [?]: 3620 [0], given: 22

Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 670 Q51 V30
GPA: 3
Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2017, 11:51
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
C is correct choice.

We're specifically told in the argument that the purpose of the plan is to avoid cutting reimbursements or harming clients financially. Even if the budget was cut by more than \$180 million last year (the amount that they expect to earn back in interest with the new plan), there are still other things the agency could to save money without harming clients financially (cut employee salaries, move into cheaper office space, etc.)

Only answer choice C states that the forty-day delay will cause financial harm to some clients, so that's the best criticism of the plan.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

Re: A government agency that reimburses its clients for bills   [#permalink] 31 May 2017, 11:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by