It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 09:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A law requiring companies to offer employees unpaid time off

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

A law requiring companies to offer employees unpaid time off [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2004, 15:48
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A law requiring companies to offer employees unpaid time off to care for their children will harm the economic competitiveness of our nation’s businesses. Companies must be free to set their own employment policies without mandated parental-leave regulations.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion of the argument above?
(A) A parental-leave law will serve to strengthen the family as a social institution in this country.
(B) Many businesses in this country already offer employees some form of parental leave.
(C) Some of the countries with the most economically competitive businesses have strong parental-leave regulations.
(D) Only companies with one hundred or more employees would be subject to the proposed parental-leave law.
(E) In most polls, a majority of citizens say they favor passage of a parental-leave law.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 896

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - parental-leave regulations [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2004, 18:21
GMATPIPO wrote:
A law requiring companies to offer employees unpaid time off to care for their children will harm the economic competitiveness of our nation’s businesses. Companies must be free to set their own employment policies without mandated parental-leave regulations.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion of the argument above?
(A) A parental-leave law will serve to strengthen the family as a social institution in this country.
(B) Many businesses in this country already offer employees some form of parental leave.
(C) Some of the countries with the most economically competitive businesses have strong parental-leave regulations.
(D) Only companies with one hundred or more employees would be subject to the proposed parental-leave law.
(E) In most polls, a majority of citizens say they favor passage of a parental-leave law.


I will go with C assuming the conclusion of the argument is that "A law requiring companies to offer employees unpaid time off to care for their children will harm the economic competitiveness of our nation’s businesses." thus anything that disproves the rationale of this conclusion will of course weaken this conclusion. C it is

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2004, 18:44
I also picked C. But I was not sure why B is wrong. Is it not strong enough?

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 850

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2004, 20:37
sureshbala, 'B' does not negate the conclusion which is "Parental leave will harm the economic competitiveness of the nation's business"

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2004, 21:50
I go with C too as it is almost the only one that dealt with "national economic comeptitive" issue

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2004, 23:48
yea... OA is C :)


i chose B too, but now i realized that it really does not negate the conclusion.... thanks guys !

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 27 Dec 2004, 23:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A law requiring companies to offer employees unpaid time off

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.