It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 13:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A light bulb company produces 2,000 light bulbs per week.

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1890

Kudos [?]: 1340 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
A light bulb company produces 2,000 light bulbs per week. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2008, 01:58
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

20.A light bulb company produces 2,000 light bulbs per week. The manager wants to ensure that standards of quality remain constant from week to week. The manager, therefore, claims that out of 2,000 light bulbs produced per week, 500 light bulbs are rejected.
Of the following, the best criticism of the manager’s plan is that the plan assumes that
(A) light bulb manufacturers cannot accept all light bulbs that produced
(B) the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced
(C) each light bulb that is reviewed is worthy of being reviewed
(D) it is difficult to judge the quality of a light bulb
(E) the 1,500 light bulbs that are accepted will be of the same quality from week to week
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1340 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 687

Kudos [?]: 577 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2008, 02:04
I will go for E, as the quality parameters for passing the bulb have to be same, all the 1500 that pass are and should be same
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 577 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 291

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2008, 02:36
I would go with B. The manager wants to manufacture 2000 bulbs, and reject 500 every week.
He is missing the point that, why can't they just manufacture 1500 PERFECT bulbs or lets say 1700 with only 50 bad and yielding 1650 PERFECT or even with 200 bad yielding 1500, instead of 2000 and then rejecting 500.

E sounds right as per the #s. But not as good as B.

Whats the OA ?

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1890

Kudos [?]: 1340 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2008, 19:05
suntaurian wrote:
I would go with B. The manager wants to manufacture 2000 bulbs, and reject 500 every week.
He is missing the point that, why can't they just manufacture 1500 PERFECT bulbs or lets say 1700 with only 50 bad and yielding 1650 PERFECT or even with 200 bad yielding 1500, instead of 2000 and then rejecting 500.

E sounds right as per the #s. But not as good as B.

Whats the OA ?

OA is E.

My choice is the same as your. I realized that I missed the point: remain constant from week to week. Thank you for your discussion.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1340 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: Vienna, Austria

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2008, 01:45
guys - i just don´t get it why it is not B, as B "the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced" perfectly points out that the rejection doesn´t make any sense! can someony help me on that?

thanx

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1890

Kudos [?]: 1340 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2008, 02:20
domleon wrote:
guys - i just don´t get it why it is not B, as B "the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced" perfectly points out that the rejection doesn´t make any sense! can someony help me on that?

thanx

I think the argument does not focus on impovement in quality of the the light bulbs. Do you think so?
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1340 [0], given: 1

Current Student
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 585

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 34

Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Schools: Ross '12 (MBA/MS)

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2008, 22:48
sondenso wrote:
domleon wrote:
guys - i just don´t get it why it is not B, as B "the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced" perfectly points out that the rejection doesn´t make any sense! can someony help me on that?

thanx

I think the argument does not focus on impovement in quality of the the light bulbs. Do you think so?

I agree. The focus isn't on the improvement of quality but rather the consistency of quality from week to week. Hence, B is out of scope and E is the best answer.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 34

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 317

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 4

Location: Washington DC

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2008, 12:44
I am for E and let me try to explain why not B.
rejecting 500 bulds each week neither ensure the quality of 1500 selected bulbs nor the constant quality.

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2008, 13:50
sondenso wrote:
20.A light bulb company produces 2,000 light bulbs per week. The manager wants to ensure that standards of quality remain constant from week to week. The manager, therefore, claims that out of 2,000 light bulbs produced per week, 500 light bulbs are rejected.

Of the following, the best criticism of the manager’s plan is that the plan assumes that

(A) light bulb manufacturers cannot accept all light bulbs that produced
(B) the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced
(C) each light bulb that is reviewed is worthy of being reviewed
(D) it is difficult to judge the quality of a light bulb
(E) the 1,500 light bulbs that are accepted will be of the same quality from week to week

I was between A and E.

B won't work because who is to know if fewer bulbs produced would actually result in better quality.
C and D do not pertain to the managers plan.
Choice A is sort of coming out of no where now that I re-read the question...

I will go with E.

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

Re: I20. Criticism assumes?   [#permalink] 30 Apr 2008, 13:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Can someone shed some light on how to prepare for the GMAT 7 08 Sep 2010, 16:21
Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that 4 18 Nov 2009, 18:21
1 Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that 4 26 Aug 2009, 08:44
Continuous indoor fluorescent light benefits the health of 9 27 May 2008, 17:17
Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that 0 08 Apr 2016, 05:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by