GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Aug 2018, 06:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A major network news organization experienced a drop in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 603
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 04 Sep 2016, 11:18

(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.

WHAT HAPPENED:-
All news channel reported loss in view

WHAT IT MEANS :-
It means the phenomenon was a result of something else that affected all news channels ... say for example :- The timing of the 2 hours controversial report on economy coincided with the timing of the final of the soccer world cup and every person in the world was busy watching the exciting final between Brazil and France and no body gave a two cent hoot about the economy and any news channel.

betterscore wrote:
A major network news organization experienced a drop in viewership in the week following the airing of a controversial report on the economy. The network also received a very large number of complaints regarding the report. The network, however, maintains that negative reactions to the report had nothing to do with its loss of viewers.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the network's position?

(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.

(B) The viewers who registered complaints with the network were regular viewers of the news organization's programs.

(C) Major network news organizations publicly attribute drops in viewership to their own reports only when they receive complaints about those reports.

(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.

(E) Most network news viewers rely on network news broadcasts as their primary source of information regarding the economy.

_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Originally posted by LogicGuru1 on 09 Jul 2016, 04:14.
Last edited by LogicGuru1 on 04 Sep 2016, 11:18, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 28 Oct 2015
Posts: 54
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2016, 07:43
souvik101990 wrote:
betterscore wrote:
A major network news organization experienced a drop in viewership in the week following the airing of a controversial report on the economy. The network also received a very large number of complaints regarding the report. The network, however, maintains that negative reactions to the report had nothing to do with its loss of viewers.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the network's position?

(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.
(B) The viewers who registered complaints with the network were regular viewers of the news organization's programs.
(C) Major network news organizations publicly attribute drops in viewership to their own reports only when they receive complaints about those reports.
(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.
(E) Most network news viewers rely on network news broadcasts as their primary source of information regarding the economy.

Hey
One thing that should be noticed is that finding out the assumption in strengthen/weaken questions is often time consuming and difficult. Assumption is not a very simple thing to figure out in complicated arguments while strengthen and weaken could be figured out using some basic strategies and common sense.
Also there could be two conclusions in different context. One could be the conclusion of the argument and one could be the conclusion of a particular character. We should not confuse the conclusion of the network with the conclusion of the argument. ( just to be sure we are not falling for a common gmat trap)

Now looking at the answer choices objectively, we need to find an answer choice that tells us that there must be some other reason for the loss of viewers. It’s better to look for answer choices in a strengthen weaken questions with an objective (makes your life easier).
B) This weakens the network’s argument. If this were true, then the regular viewers are more likely to not watch the network anymore because they were not happy with the network’s broadcast.
C) C does nothing because we are not concerned with the declaration of less viewership, but the reason for which it has declined.
D) I don’t know why people are favoring D here. It does not even mention the loss of viewership which we need to connect with something else to validate an answer choice.
E) E is largely irrelevant. Again we need some reason to support the network by saying that there was some other reason to declined viewership.

A) A is the perfect answer choice. It says that other network had similar decline in viewership which could mean there were other probable causes (holidays, power outage etc.)
A is the clear winner.

Hi,

Can you please explain in option A, what if there are no other reasons for the decline in viewership for the other major network news organizations apart from 'negative reactions on report'. Couldn't this be possible since we are not given a specific reason in option A and we are just assuming that there would not be another reason.
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 57
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2016, 03:49
(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.
It could be that there is similar a news or may be larger than that has happened or even due to changes in the program can effect viewer ship. No where it is mentioned that both these network news organisation also stays in the same location or geography and could be thousands of miles away.

(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.
This is purely related to the same organisation and eventhough the intensity of old controversial report programs are less , the viewership expects and are habituated of such programs and writing letters. May be for the mentioned program more letters have come, but reduce in viewer ship may not be due to controversial program that aired.
So, this option is also not perfect , but better option than others.

What is the source of the question ?Can some please clear the confusion.
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3690
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2016, 06:06
ravikrishna1979 wrote:
(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.
It could be that there is similar a news or may be larger than that has happened or even due to changes in the program can effect viewer ship. No where it is mentioned that both these network news organisation also stays in the same location or geography and could be thousands of miles away.

(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.
This is purely related to the same organisation and eventhough the intensity of old controversial report programs are less , the viewership expects and are habituated of such programs and writing letters. May be for the mentioned program more letters have come, but reduce in viewer ship may not be due to controversial program that aired.
So, this option is also not perfect , but better option than others.

What is the source of the question ?Can some please clear the confusion.

A is correct because it provides a reason that there has been a similar decrease in viewership of its peers. So, it could happen that there is an overall decrease in viewership hence strengthening the claim that the reports had no effect on the decrease.

D is wrong because it is actually a weakner which is weakening the claim made by the network. It provides a similar scenario that happened in the past due to reports. Hence, telling us that Reports were the root cause.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3185
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2016, 06:44
souvik101990 wrote:
betterscore wrote:
A major network news organization experienced a drop in viewership in the week following the airing of a controversial report on the economy. The network also received a very large number of complaints regarding the report. The network, however, maintains that negative reactions to the report had nothing to do with its loss of viewers.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the network's position?

(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.
(B) The viewers who registered complaints with the network were regular viewers of the news organization's programs.
(C) Major network news organizations publicly attribute drops in viewership to their own reports only when they receive complaints about those reports.
(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.
(E) Most network news viewers rely on network news broadcasts as their primary source of information regarding the economy.

Hey
One thing that should be noticed is that finding out the assumption in strengthen/weaken questions is often time consuming and difficult. Assumption is not a very simple thing to figure out in complicated arguments while strengthen and weaken could be figured out using some basic strategies and common sense.
Also there could be two conclusions in different context. One could be the conclusion of the argument and one could be the conclusion of a particular character. We should not confuse the conclusion of the network with the conclusion of the argument. ( just to be sure we are not falling for a common gmat trap)

Now looking at the answer choices objectively, we need to find an answer choice that tells us that there must be some other reason for the loss of viewers. It’s better to look for answer choices in a strengthen weaken questions with an objective (makes your life easier).
B) This weakens the network’s argument. If this were true, then the regular viewers are more likely to not watch the network anymore because they were not happy with the network’s broadcast.
C) C does nothing because we are not concerned with the declaration of less viewership, but the reason for which it has declined.
D) I don’t know why people are favoring D here. It does not even mention the loss of viewership which we need to connect with something else to validate an answer choice.
E) E is largely irrelevant. Again we need some reason to support the network by saying that there was some other reason to declined viewership.

A) A is the perfect answer choice. It says that other network had similar decline in viewership which could mean there were other probable causes (holidays, power outage etc.)
A is the clear winner.

Hi,

Can you please explain in option A, what if there are no other reasons for the decline in viewership for the other major network news organizations apart from 'negative reactions on report'. Couldn't this be possible since we are not given a specific reason in option A and we are just assuming that there would not be another reason.

This kind of assumptions are OK for strengthening / weakening questions. Unlike assumptions questions, strengthening/weakening questions are not "must be true" type. The answer is correct, if it provides a reason that the conclusion MAY (strengthening) or MAY NOT ( weakening) - NOT MUST or MUST NOT - be true. It is not required that the correct option conclusively prove or disprove the conclusion - (as the name suggests, it requires to strengthen or weaken).
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 259
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2017, 05:39
Narrowed to A nad D, but D in turn doesn't mention whether previous time complaints were followed by slump in viewership or not, hence only A can slightly strengthen the claim. Tricky one.
Intern
Joined: 18 Oct 2016
Posts: 8
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2017, 13:41
What happens if a viewer stop using a network, it will opt for the other. Meaning if there is no increase in the viewer base with respect to the fall in the said network then it is understood the reason cannot be attributed to a particular report alone..

Hope my reasoning makes sense (Y)!
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1849
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2017, 22:02
B,C,D are out.
D is out of scope.
This question can be treated as either a weaken question or an explanation.
A is correct because in either way, E does not fit a right answer and because E has nothing to do with the connection between loss of views and increasing numbers of complaints. Also, E quite contradicts with what is stated in the passage. That is, if most of viewers rely on the network organization, why there is a drop in views.
Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2017
Posts: 12
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2017, 04:04
(A)

Remember that we are just trying to strengthen the fact that it was not because of the report that resulted in the loss of viewership, not to prove it.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 277
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Investment Banking (Venture Capital)
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2017, 12:46
A major network news organization experienced a drop in viewership in the week following the airing of a controversial report on the economy. The network also received a very large number of complaints regarding the report. The network, however, maintains that negative reactions to the report had nothing to do with its loss of viewers.

* NOTE: THIS PASSAGE SETS UP A CAUSAL ARGUMENT. THE IDEA IS THAT COMPLAINTS DID NOT LEAD TO A DECREASE IN VIEWERS!

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the network's position?

(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.
- This is correct b/c if other major network news organizations experienced a reduction in viewership, then the idea that complaints caused a decrease in viewers is mitigated.

(B) The viewers who registered complaints with the network were regular viewers of the news organization's programs.
- OPPOSITE. This proves that negative reactions don't always lead to a decrease in viewership.

(C) Major network news organizations publicly attribute drops in viewership to their own reports only when they receive complaints about those reports.
- Out of scope. Who cares what major network news orgs ATTRIBUTE drops in viewership to?

(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.
- OPPOSITE. If viewers have complained in the past about controversial reports and have still watched other programs, then this mitigates the idea that complaints cause a decrease in viewers

(E) Most network news viewers rely on network news broadcasts as their primary source of information regarding the economy.
- Out of scope. Who care if broadcasts are primary or secondary source of info regarding the economy?

Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Posts: 9
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2017, 13:54
If you have chosen D, it is false
(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.

It did not tell anything whether there was a similar loss of viewers happened then.
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2016
Posts: 137
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2018, 08:05
A major network news organization experienced a drop in viewership in the week following the airing of a controversial report on the economy. The network also received a very large number of complaints regarding the report. The network, however, maintains that negative reactions to the report had nothing to do with its loss of viewers.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the network's position?

(A) The other major network news organizations reported similar reductions in viewership during the same week.

(B) The viewers who registered complaints with the network were regular viewers of the news organization's programs.

(C) Major network news organizations publicly attribute drops in viewership to their own reports only when they receive complaints about those reports.

(D) This was not the first time that this network news organization has aired a controversial report on the economy that has inspired viewers to complain to the network.

(E) Most network news viewers rely on network news broadcasts as their primary source of information regarding the economy.

This is a strengthen the argument question.
Like weaken, strengthen questions also require us to isolate the conclusion. As we will be looking for the answer that makes our belief stronger on the premise-conclusion relationship such as analogies, survey, reports, statistical data etc.
Protect the missing information
a) by keeping any option that fills the gap
b) by eliminating the answer that attacks the missing information

Conclusion: Negative reactions to the report had nothing to do with its loss of viewers.
We need to protect this information. There can be an alternate reason for the loss of viewrs or this loss was general and affected other networks also.

A hinges on the assumptions that we came up with and is our answer.
Re: A major network news organization experienced a drop in &nbs [#permalink] 13 Apr 2018, 08:05

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 53 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.