It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 10:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A majority of the international journalists surveyed view

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 893
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2012, 07:37
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

37% (01:00) correct 63% (01:15) wrong based on 221 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

26. A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could

Source: Brutal SC's

Again I am having same doubt , I had PM'ed 2-3 GMAT instructors long back but no one replied my luck

This was my query will be glad if someone explain this :

"This is regarding the pronoun antecedent rule . I have one query regarding that.

When we are 100% sure that a pronoun refer backs to a particular noun, I mean it depends on person to person how they interpret.

For example:

The city lights when turned on disturb many residents so they are turned off. (This is ambiguity that residents are turned off, or it is self understood that lights are turned off).
The city lights when turned on disturb many residents so they turn them off. (Who turn Whom off? or it is also self understood that residents turn city lights off).

Plz quote a thumb rule ."
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 3789
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2012, 07:48
Ambiguous pronouns is NOT a rule!
The only 2 pronoun rules (thumb if you will) are:
1. A pronoun must have a valid antecedent.
2. The pronoun must agree in number.
_________________
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 893
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2012, 07:54
souvik101990 wrote:
Ambiguous pronouns is NOT a rule!
The only 2 pronoun rules (thumb if you will) are:
1. A pronoun must have a valid antecedent.
2. The pronoun must agree in number.

Hi souvik,

Can u plz explain the two examples I quoted in my query .

For example for one sentence one guy can say "yaa I understood what is antecedent for this pronoun", other guy can say "no the antecedent to this pronoun is not clear".

Plz can u elaborate using examples that I gave .

rgds,
saurabh
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Manager
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 50
Concentration: Marketing, Statistics
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2013, 00:30
Why is the answer choice not E? Is it because it needs to be "x be and y be" for parallelism?

The reason I initially stayed away from D was because I thought the use of "they" could be ambiguous - it might refer to the power stations or to the journalists (both are plural so the plural pronoun "they" would work, right?)
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1130
Location: United States
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2013, 14:41
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
catalysis wrote:
Why is the answer choice not E? Is it because it needs to be "x be and y be" for parallelism?

The reason I initially stayed away from D was because I thought the use of "they" could be ambiguous - it might refer to the power stations or to the journalists (both are plural so the plural pronoun "they" would work, right?)

Hello catalysis.

No, if we don't need to repeat the auxiliary verb "be" to make a structure parallel. "will or could be" or "will be or could be" are fine.

"they" is NOT ambiguous. "they" only refers to power stations because "journalists" is NOT the main subject, which is "a majority of journalists". Hence, "they" is used correctly.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 149
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2013, 02:37
Hi pqhai,

Agree. Choice D is clear and concise.

If choice D had not been present in the options, E would have been the next right answer. Am I correct?

Thanks.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 259
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2014, 15:58
TGC wrote:
26. A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could

Source: Brutal SC's

Do not understand why D is right.

D will be like : A majority of the international journalists surveyed think that they will be or could be made sufficiently safe in the future.

It does not make sense to me. Can someone explain plz!

Thanks
_________________

Think outside the box

Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 178
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2014, 01:34
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Striking out prep. phrases and modifiers

A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

As we see, but is acting as a parallel marker and not as a co-coordinating conjunction. but must hence be followed by a verb - parallel to view

straight away, eliminate A,B,C for the above stated reason.

(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could

(D) think that they will be or could
Let's check E before we worry about D.

Addnl. notes: If you are worried that they could refer to journalists, hold your horses. ...journalists... is a part of the prep. phrase. The only other plural noun is power stations. Hence, 'they' has a clear referent.

(E) think the power stations would or could
Notice the absence of the relative clause modifier - that. 'think the power stations ..' is a wrong construction.
Another issue with E - or being the parallel marker, verb forms on either side of or must be parallel. (Not necessarily in the same tense though)

So we are left with D.
_________________

What are modifiers ??

Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2013
Posts: 33
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2014, 04:55
sivasanjeev wrote:
Striking out prep. phrases and modifiers

A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

As we see, but is acting as a parallel marker and not as a co-coordinating conjunction. but must hence be followed by a verb - parallel to view

straight away, eliminate A,B,C for the above stated reason.

(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could

(D) think that they will be or could
Let's check E before we worry about D.

Addnl. notes: If you are worried that they could refer to journalists, hold your horses. ...journalists... is a part of the prep. phrase. The only other plural noun is power stations. Hence, 'they' has a clear referent.

(E) think the power stations would or could
Notice the absence of the relative clause modifier - that. 'think the power stations ..' is a wrong construction.
Another issue with E - or being the parallel marker, verb forms on either side of or must be parallel. (Not necessarily in the same tense though)

So we are left with D.

Great explanation but I want to elaborate a bit more on why E is wrong. The use of " Power stations" is redundant because "they" clearly refers to " Power stations" therefore we do not nee to use "Power stations" . Hope it makes sense.
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2524
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '20
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2015, 07:35
I am more concern between will and could
since we are talking about future - it looks like there is an uncertainty, since we are presented the modal verb "could".
If we know smth for sure, it should be WILL and CAN.
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2015
Posts: 87
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 May 2017, 23:34
I believe E is incorrect because the journalists "view" (present tense) the nukes as (then need present tense). Now in E we have 'would' which is a past tense construction whereas in D they have will (present tense) and could.

If i'm wrong hopefully a person smarter than I will correct me :D

Zatmah wrote:
sivasanjeev wrote:
Striking out prep. phrases and modifiers

A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

As we see, but is acting as a parallel marker and not as a co-coordinating conjunction. but must hence be followed by a verb - parallel to view

straight away, eliminate A,B,C for the above stated reason.

(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could

(D) think that they will be or could
Let's check E before we worry about D.

Addnl. notes: If you are worried that they could refer to journalists, hold your horses. ...journalists... is a part of the prep. phrase. The only other plural noun is power stations. Hence, 'they' has a clear referent.

(E) think the power stations would or could
Notice the absence of the relative clause modifier - that. 'think the power stations ..' is a wrong construction.
Another issue with E - or being the parallel marker, verb forms on either side of or must be parallel. (Not necessarily in the same tense though)

So we are left with D.

Great explanation but I want to elaborate a bit more on why E is wrong. The use of " Power stations" is redundant because "they" clearly refers to " Power stations" therefore we do not nee to use "Power stations" . Hope it makes sense.
Re: A majority of the international journalists surveyed view   [#permalink] 24 May 2017, 23:34
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nu 8 15 Mar 2016, 01:50
1 A majority of the international journalists surveyed view 9 29 Aug 2012, 17:37
26 A majority of the international journalists surveyed view 44 10 Feb 2017, 02:08
9 A majority of the international journalists surveyed view 19 13 Jul 2016, 18:24
1 A majority of the international journalists surveyed view 17 26 Mar 2015, 18:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by