It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 11:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 41
GPA: 3.91
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2012, 01:30
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (02:58) correct 56% (02:03) wrong based on 230 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
(B) The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
(C) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
(D) The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
(E) The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 718
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2012, 07:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
IMO C
The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional ...now this line is the position given by the author and the first boldface is clearly criticized by this position.
also notice how clearly the second boldface supports this position.
That's my :idea:
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 434
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2014, 03:26
2
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
My query is can anyone explain whether "suggestion" is same meaning as "claim", and "a poll result reveals" as "judgment", please
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 233
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2014, 11:35
Though, I got this answer right.

I believe second is a fact rather than a judgement.


goodyear2013 wrote:
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.

My query is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
can anyone explain whether "suggestion" is same meaning as "claim", and "a poll result reveals" as "judgment", please

_________________

Middle of nowhere!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 103
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Dec 2014, 13:33
Hi ,

Can any1 explain why C is the right answer
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Posts: 5
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2014, 02:37
Shree9975 wrote:
Hi ,

Can any1 explain why C is the right answer


Accuracy is the most important factor that needs to be considered.
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Posts: 10
marketing expert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2015, 11:37
3
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 538
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2015, 19:57
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Good question.
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

First statement is a cause effect.
Second statement (premise) provides support to conclusion.
Conclusion goes against the First statement.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A) The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B) The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
>> second statement doesnt directly hit the stmt 1. It just supports the conclusion.
C) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D) The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
>> First stmt is opposite to conclusion and hence can be base of concl. Infact stmt 2 shall be the base of conclusion.
E) The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.
>>The second stmt contradicts the first.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Re: marketing expert [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2015, 06:56
jaskarn singh wrote:
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.


The answer should be Option C based on the following reasoning:

The first statement is the position of the consultant. The second statement is the position taken by the argument, which contradicts the position taken by the consultant. Keeping that in mind:

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position. Incorrect is the position is opposed by the argument.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion. The second does not really disprove but gives another position.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position. Correct!
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic. The first statement is not the position of the argument.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct. Definitely wrong because it goes against the first statement.

Hope this helps :)
_________________

Regards!

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 192
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2015, 05:26
goodyear2013 wrote:
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.

My query is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
can anyone explain whether "suggestion" is same meaning as "claim", and "a poll result reveals" as "judgment", please


Hi,
If a poll showed something how can it be a judgement?It should be evidence?
PLease help
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 445
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2015, 04:37
ssriva2 wrote:
goodyear2013 wrote:
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.

My query is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
can anyone explain whether "suggestion" is same meaning as "claim", and "a poll result reveals" as "judgment", please


Hi,
If a poll showed something how can it be a judgement?It should be evidence?
PLease help



True,

Option B makes more sense since its an evidence "reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season" while the judgement is "The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional"

rohitmanglik: can you pls tell why you decided to choose C over B?

Regards,
Dom
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 192
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2015, 05:50
goodyear2013 wrote:
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.

My query is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
can anyone explain whether "suggestion" is same meaning as "claim", and "a poll result reveals" as "judgment", please


Hi,
If a poll showed something how can it be a judgement?It should be evidence?



@mikemcgarry,@carcass,@egmat,

PLease help here
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Posts: 5
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2015, 08:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
Could someone please provide OE, difficult to believe that BF2 is a judgement?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2015, 22:25
The word "judgment" is an indicator of a claim while the word "evidence" is an indicator of Fact.In this argument both sentence are claims and all other options can be eliminated except C.
_________________

Consider Kudos if my post helped you. Thanks!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 10
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2015, 01:41
Answer can not be C , as the second bold face is not a "judgement". Second bold face is an evidence, so the answer has to be B.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2014
Posts: 19
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2015, 02:13
I marked C. I thought that the second statement was an opinion because of the phrase 'would be ill-advised'

OE for why B is incorrect:

This is a Boldface Type question, in which you are required to define the role of the two boldface sections in the argument. Read the argument and break it down using indicative words:
- Sentence 1 uses the phrase suggested that meaning that the first boldface portion is a suggested plan, theory or judgment, put forward by the expert in favor of hiring sport professionals.
- Sentence 2 is purely factual, a premise.
- The first part of the last sentence contains the phrase would be ill-advised telling us that it's the author's own judgment, i.e., the argument's conclusion.
- The second part of the last sentence, the second boldface portion is a prediction believed to be accurate by the sports analysts.

Although the first definition in this answer choice is correct, the second is not. We cannot say that the second portion disproves anything since it is only an opinion. Although it is the opinion of experts, it is still a prediction about events that may or may not occur in the future.
_________________

Kudos please if I helped you! :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2013
Posts: 125
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2015, 01:57
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic. >>Challenging logic would be int. fam. pros. wont be value added
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.
_________________

Please kindly click on "+1 Kudos", if you think my post is useful

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 585
Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2015, 03:33
B or C

B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship (correct); the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion (incorrect - the second is not evidence, it is just opinion)

C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position (correct - conclusion says that it is ill-advised ); the second is a judgment offered as support for that position (correct).

C
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Posts: 214
GMAT Date: 08-04-2015
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2015, 07:19
The main problem with B is that BF1 is NOT a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship. It is a suggestion alright, but what about potential cause-and-effect?? I totally disagree with B.

C has a problem that the BF2 looks more like an evidence than a judgment, but can't we look at BF2 as the AUTHOR's judgment behind his position that The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional.
Google says - Judgement (or judgment) is the evaluation of evidence to make a decision.
Experts pls suggest.

I chose C naturally and the judgment didn't bug me as much as the cause-and-effect relationship

Thanks.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 51
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2015, 21:40
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position. - the second does not support the first at all.
B. The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion. - second does not actually disprove the cause or the effect because the relationship is not necessary.
C. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position. - first one is definitely a claim which is criticized and the second is the judgment (the collective opinion of sports analysts is a judgment not evidence or fact imo) that supports the criticism.
D. The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic. - the word logic doesnt make sense to me here.
E. The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.the word theory does not really fit. the first statement is a claim. moreover, the second statement does not support the first one. so this is out anyway.
Re: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major   [#permalink] 28 Dec 2015, 21:40

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 A major car company daagh 7 09 Apr 2017, 06:24
1 It is commonly held among marketing experts that in a nonexpanding mar amitsurana 4 07 Apr 2017, 03:53
2 A major sports programming network dqtuan9627 2 18 Sep 2016, 10:02
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Marketing strategists at a major video retailer ... avohden 5 16 May 2016, 12:12
A major sports programming amitprakash09 1 03 Oct 2016, 12:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.