A new gardening rake with an S-shaped handle reduces : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 Feb 2017, 02:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A new gardening rake with an S-shaped handle reduces

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 540 [0], given: 20

A new gardening rake with an S-shaped handle reduces [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 02:05
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (03:07) correct 40% (02:07) wrong based on 94 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A new gardening rake with an S-shaped handle reduces compression stress on the spine during the pull stroke to about one-fifth of what it is with a straight-handled rake. During the push stroke, however, compression stress is five times more with the new rake than with a straight-handled rake. Neither the push stroke nor the pull stroke with a straight-handled rake produces enough compression stress to cause injury, but compression stress during the push stroke with the new rake is above the danger level. Therefore, straight-handled rakes are better than the new rakes for minimizing risk of spinal injury.
The conclusion above is properly drawn from the premises given if which one of the following is true?
(A) Compression stress resulting from pushing is the only cause of injuries to the spine that occurs as a result of raking.
(B) Raking is a frequent cause of spinal injury among gardeners.
(C) The redesign of a tool rarely results in a net gain of efficiency, since gains tend to be counterbalanced by losses.
(D) A garden rake can never be used in such a way that all the strokes with that rake are push strokes.
(E) It is not possible to design a garden rake with a handle that is other than straight or S-shaped.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 125
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 47

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 02:25
A is the best choice
B C and E doesn't have anything to do with the fact that "push stroke with the new rake is above the danger level"
And D is total opposite
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 02:57
I contemplate between A and B. C, D, E are out of scope.

A is stronger so I pick A.

This is the assumption question and we need a link between the PUSH and the Spinal Injury to fill the gap.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 150
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 04:27
A is correct.
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 196
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 11

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 04:33
1
KUDOS
rohitgoel15 wrote:
A new gardening rake with an S-shaped handle reduces compression stress on the spine during the pull stroke to about one-fifth of what it is with a straight-handled rake. During the push stroke, however, compression stress is five times more with the new rake than with a straight-handled rake. Neither the push stroke nor the pull stroke with a straight-handled rake produces enough compression stress to cause injury, but compression stress during the push stroke with the new rake is above the danger level. Therefore, straight-handled rakes are better than the new rakes for minimizing risk of spinal injury.
The conclusion above is properly drawn from the premises given if which one of the following is true?
(A) Compression stress resulting from pushing is the only cause of injuries to the spine that occurs as a result of raking.
(B) Raking is a frequent cause of spinal injury among gardeners.
(C) The redesign of a tool rarely results in a net gain of efficiency, since gains tend to be counterbalanced by losses.
(D) A garden rake can never be used in such a way that all the strokes with that rake are push strokes.
(E) It is not possible to design a garden rake with a handle that is other than straight or S-shaped.

I Picked A,

but on second thought i am quite inclined to E.
if new rakes with another shape is able to reduce compression stress and seldom creates spinal injusry, this argument will be flawed.
And option E clearly defends this possiblity.

Can someone please explain where iam going wrong? Is it way too out of scope?

Thanks
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 06:42
ramana wrote:
I Picked A,

but on second thought i am quite inclined to E.
if new rakes with another shape is able to reduce compression stress and seldom creates spinal injusry, this argument will be flawed.
And option E clearly defends this possiblity.

Can someone please explain where iam going wrong? Is it way too out of scope?

Thanks

E is incorrect because the argument only concern that the SR better than NR, it doesn't matter if there is a better one out there, it only compare between the 2 types of rakes.
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 596 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 06:58
I liked A but I am inclined towards E too.

(E) It is not possible to design a garden rake with a handle that is other than straight or S-shaped --> Since no other designs are possible and since S-shaped rake has negative features, the only rake left to be used is straight rake. thereby provide support for the conlclusion.

Can someone explain why E is incorrect?
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 333
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 07:21
+1 for A!
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2010
Posts: 128
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 07:30
my A
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 18:12
seekmba wrote:
I liked A but I am inclined towards E too.

(E) It is not possible to design a garden rake with a handle that is other than straight or S-shaped --> Since no other designs are possible and since S-shaped rake has negative features, the only rake left to be used is straight rake. thereby provide support for the conlclusion.

Can someone explain why E is incorrect?

E is incorrect, because in the Arguments, S Shaped Rake has negative, but it was not sure whether that negative linked with Spinal injury. So even if there are only 2 types of Rakes, we can't be sure whether Straight Rakes is better than S Shaped Rake for MINIMIZE spinal injury

It is like saying Yao Minh is not as quick compare to Steve Nash and then to conclude therefore Steve Nash is better than Yao Minh at Dunking.
Senior Manager
Status: Fighting on
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 318
Schools: UCLA (R1 interview-WL), UNC(R2--interview-ding) Oxford(R2-Admit), Kelley (R2- Admit ), McCombs(R2)
WE 1: SE - 1
WE 2: Engineer - 3
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 18:00
not good , I fell for E, had it narrowed to A and E
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 171
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2010, 03:43
I Choose E as well.

Basically the last line of the argument

Therefore, straight-handled rakes are better than the new rakes for minimizing risk of spinal injury.

new rakes - New rakes does not definately means the S shaped rake. So went for E to rule out other shapes.

What say you ?
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2010, 04:06
KissGMAT wrote:
I Choose E as well.

Basically the last line of the argument

Therefore, straight-handled rakes are better than the new rakes for minimizing risk of spinal injury.

new rakes - New rakes does not definately means the S shaped rake. So went for E to rule out other shapes.

What say you ?

New rake is S-shaped, refer to line one. And this is what talked about.
Ans is A
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10637
Followers: 940

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Re: A new gardening rake with an S-shaped handle reduces [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2015, 21:27
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: A new gardening rake with an S-shaped handle reduces   [#permalink] 18 Feb 2015, 21:27
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 In an effort to reduce the number of deer 6 05 Jun 2015, 01:49
2 In an attempt to reduce the crime rate 2 25 Apr 2015, 07:55
3 To reduce its budget deficit 4 30 Sep 2013, 06:25
1 Chema Options to Reduce Emissions 5 02 Jul 2013, 10:34
Legislators in New Victoria are debating a plan to reduce 7 11 Jul 2010, 05:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by