GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Oct 2018, 04:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Got Bling! Joined Phd Finance at IIML
Affiliations: IIMB, advantages.us, IIML
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: iim-bangalore - Class of 1994
GMAT 1: 750 Q59 V43
GPA: 3.12
WE: Research (Investment Banking)
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2013, 22:18
I agree D might be used against the candidates for wanting to choose a direct opposite of the stated goal of the argument and we should watch out However the argument in A seems weak or unsubstantiated ( as in B) or both and one finds oneself choosing D which is a provided fact that can given other arguments double the yield.I refer marking the question incomplete as strategy.

That will certainly avoid errors in the exam



techjanson wrote:

Swagatalakshmi wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Cornplanted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because .

A. with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation

B. with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants

C. with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required

D. with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double

E. with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilized much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted




Answer: A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 317
Schools: Schulich '16
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2013, 16:11
A it is.

i narrowed it down to A and D.But D is undermined from the argument("less yield" so less profit.)
The question is tellilng us to find an alternative OTHER than yield.(fertilizers,pesticides etc)


hope it helps
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2014
Posts: 10
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2014, 22:30
Yup, D cannot be the answer. Its because we can find that the final output from the action would not be the double amount.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 250
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2014, 08:27
1
the OA is A. Mods please add the OA :D
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2014
Posts: 63
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2014, 14:51
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Cornplanted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because .

A. with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation

B. with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants

C. with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required

D. with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double

E. with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilized much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted


D is wrong because it does not take the argument into account and the formula Sales - Costs = Profit...

The argument is "the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre".

In general, arguments that discuss profits need to be addressed with the formula of Sales - Costs = Profits. Answer choice A attacks the "cost" part of the formula. If the farmer lowers the costs, profits will rise!

All answer choice D really says is that the number of plants will double. You can not assume that sales will double with costs only rising marginally to create double the amount of profits. This might not be the best advice but you can assume D from the statement - if the spacing is cut in half, the number of plants must double.

Hope this helps...
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Birds fly because they have wings, not because they have sky.
Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 213
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2015, 10:13
IMO D.

This option is most closely inferred from the premise of the para.
_________________

Regards,
J

--------------------------------------------------
Consider Kudos if I helped in some way!!!

Perseverance is the hard work you do after you get tired of doing the hard work you already did.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 466
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2015, 00:48
1
the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because...
Profit = Revenue - Expense.

A. with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation
>> Correct.

D. with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double
>>"Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. " reduces the effect of "the number of plants grown per acre will almost double".
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 217
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2015, 01:32
1
Here we go...

According to me Option A is correct.

Reasoning:
corn will be planted only fifteen inches apart instead of usual thirty inches -> This will lower yield, however the profit will double-----> How to fill this GAP (lower yield, higher profit)

option A fills the gap.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 251
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2015, 21:27
1
+1 for Option A. Souvik- Please post OAs.


souvik101990 wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because __________.

A. with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation

B. with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants

C. with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required

D. with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double

E. with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilized much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted

OA - 24 hours

_________________

Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.

Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 468
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2015, 02:45
1
P : New Harvesting Machine plants fifteen inches apart instead of thirty inches.
Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant

C : the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because

Provide an Answer option that Strengthens the Conclusion :


B,C,E Can easily be eliminated.

Between A,D: A doesnt really convince me to believe that the Profit will double.

Option D : The plantation is Doubled clearly provides strength to the Conclusion Drawn.

Ans : D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 217
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2015, 03:01
RaviChandra wrote:
P : New Harvesting Machine plants fifteen inches apart instead of thirty inches.
Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant

C : the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because

Provide an Answer option that Strengthens the Conclusion :


B,C,E Can easily be eliminated.

Between A,D: A does really convince me to believe that the Profit will double.

Option D : The plantation is Doubled clearly provides strength to the Conclusion Drawn.

Ans : D



Option D states : with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double


In the argument, it is mentioned:

Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant.

According to me, it directly contradicts that is already stated in the argument; However, we need to find something that will justify the lower yield but high profit.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 468
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2015, 04:03
1
DesiGmat wrote:


Option D states : with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double


In the argument, it is mentioned:

Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant.

According to me, it directly contradicts that is already stated in the argument; However, we need to find something that will justify the lower yield but high profit.

Correct me if I'm wrong.



yeah i guess your point is valid... and because of this D could be wrong
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 995
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2015, 02:33
[quote="Swagatalakshmi"]Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Cornplanted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because .

A. with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation

B. with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants

C. with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required

D. with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double

E. with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilized much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted[/quote


IMO its A ..but yes VERY good question again....
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2016
Posts: 117
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2016, 11:17
Trap answer is D if you don't read carefully. This is what the testmakers want! to make sure you are not paying attention and then bam fall into the trap
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 75
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 19:50
mikemcgarry / GMATNinja can you please explain?

After going through the explanations above, I understood that option D is incorrect (this is what I had marked though). The reason is - Although the number of plants may almost double, the yield for all those plants will be low. If the reduction in yield = or more than increase in yield because of the number of plants doubling, we aren't sure.

However, A also makes an assumption. P = S - C. Question says yield is reduced (i.e., sales is reduced). Option A says C(cost) is reduced too.
Does this not imply that profit may remain same or increase or decrease depending on the value? How can we assume it will double the profits?
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 20:14
Chef wrote:
mikemcgarry / GMATNinja can you please explain?

After going through the explanations above, I understood that option D is incorrect (this is what I had marked though). The reason is - Although the number of plants may almost double, the yield for all those plants will be low. If the reduction in yield = or more than increase in yield because of the number of plants doubling, we aren't sure.

However, A also makes an assumption. P = S - C. Question says yield is reduced (i.e., sales is reduced). Option A says C(cost) is reduced too.
Does this not imply that profit may remain same or increase or decrease depending on the value? How can we assume it will double the profits?

Dear Chef,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, you missed a crucial detail. It didn't say that total yield for the whole field is reduced. It said that
Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant.
That's very different.

If yield per plant remained unchanged, then planting twice as many plants in the same field would double the yield. If the yield per plant decreases some moderate amount, then the full field would not give double the yield. We can assume that yield per plant goes down, say, by 10% o4 20%, but not by more than 50%. That would be a drastic reduction that would have to be noted in the text--essentially, the prompt would be lying by understatement, if the real drop in the yield were more than 50%. If the drop per plant is less than 50%, then the total yield of the field will increase, so S will increase.

If we then also decrease C, this is sure to increase profit.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 75
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 21:26
mikemcgarry wrote:
Chef wrote:
mikemcgarry / GMATNinja can you please explain?

After going through the explanations above, I understood that option D is incorrect (this is what I had marked though). The reason is - Although the number of plants may almost double, the yield for all those plants will be low. If the reduction in yield = or more than increase in yield because of the number of plants doubling, we aren't sure.

However, A also makes an assumption. P = S - C. Question says yield is reduced (i.e., sales is reduced). Option A says C(cost) is reduced too.
Does this not imply that profit may remain same or increase or decrease depending on the value? How can we assume it will double the profits?

Dear Chef,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, you missed a crucial detail. It didn't say that total yield for the whole field is reduced. It said that
Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant.
That's very different.

If yield per plant remained unchanged, then planting twice as many plants in the same field would double the yield. If the yield per plant decreases some moderate amount, then the full field would not give double the yield. We can assume that yield per plant goes down, say, by 10% o4 20%, but not by more than 50%. That would be a drastic reduction that would have to be noted in the text--essentially, the prompt would be lying by understatement, if the real drop in the yield were more than 50%. If the drop per plant is less than 50%, then the total yield of the field will increase, so S will increase.

If we then also decrease C, this is sure to increase profit.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)



Thanks Mike.

But how did you assume that the reduction is not more than 50%? Question just says reduced yield per plant.

"essentially, the prompt would be lying by understatement, if the real drop in the yield were more than 50%." Is this an assumption?
VP
VP
User avatar
P
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1126
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 01:31
The answer is A
We have to show that the plan will increase the profitability of the farmers .
B is just irrelevant.
C weaken as it will decrease the profitability because bid increased cost of the fertilizers.
D this one is tricky as it tells that the numbers of plants will increase but we do know whether this will offset the low yeild and cost of additional seeds.
E out of scope .
Only A can increase profitability.

Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2017, 14:36
Chef wrote:
Thanks Mike.

But how did you assume that the reduction is not more than 50%? Question just says reduced yield per plant.

"essentially, the prompt would be lying by understatement, if the real drop in the yield were more than 50%." Is this an assumption?

Dear Chef,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, you are using fundamentalist logic. You are reading this GMAT CR practice question with a fundamentalist hyper-literalist reading. The GMAT will punish you over and over if you stick to this reading strategy.

Yes, we have to be careful in reading exactly what the language says, but we have to take into account the sense of the language, how people actually communicate. Everything spoken has implications, and we have to be sensitive to these implications, not simply what is printed in black & white.

Consider the following statement:
"People in the USA are trying overthrow and bring down the entire system of government."
In a fundamentalist reading, this would be true, because there are a very small number of wacky people who have these anarchical designs. In the super literal reading, this sentence is correct. The problem is, this phrase makes it sound as if a large chunk of the population is engaged in these destabilizing efforts, and those implications are 100% false. If you presented this statement to any native English speaker in America and ask them whether it was true or false, almost everyone would say it is false. Here's the statement that native speakers would recognize as true and accurate.
Some very small proportion of people in the USA are trying overthrow and bring down the entire system of government.
The way language is used in everyday life does NOT follow the norms of a fundamentalist reading.

In context, the argument is creating the expectation that, even though we would have double the plants, we would not have quite double the yield, because "corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant." Saying this factually like this implies a decrease of maybe up to 20-30%. If a company said, "When you make this change, you will have lower yields," and then the yields went down by 75%, you would have the basis of a possible lawsuit. In other words, the phrasing we are given would sound like a lie if the drop were substantial. To be an honest claim, such a drop would have to be specified:
Corn planted this closely will produce a substantial decrease in yields per plant.
That would be a very different statement, which we would expect would involve a much larger drop.

My friend, you strike me as a person with a brilliant logical mathematical mind who has very little experience reading every day English, in newspapers and new journals. You will not understand what you are missing until you develop the intuition from a habit of reading. See:
How to Improve Your GMAT Verbal Score

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 423
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2017, 22:14
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because __________________________ .

A. with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation

B. with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants

C. with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required

D. with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double

E. with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilized much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted


look at D, a close answer.
on CR, we alway have a close answer, other three choices easy to eliminate. we need more time to consider close answer. at first close answer is good , but after considering it, it is not correct.

the key to success on CR is ability to realize a close answer. when we are stuck between two choice, we are good at CR already.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f &nbs [#permalink] 08 Sep 2017, 22:14

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 44 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.