GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Aug 2018, 08:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1102
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2017, 12:01
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only fifteen inches apart, instead of the usual thirty inches. Corn planted this closely will produce lower yields per plant. Nevertheless, the new machine will allow corn growers to double their profits per acre because _______.

A. with the closer spacing of the rows, the growing corn plants will quickly form a dense canopy of leaves, which will, by shading the ground, minimize the need for costly weed control and irrigation -Correct. This shows that the costs will actually reduce. From the premise we already know that the produce will increase, so the cost of maintenance should also reduce so that overall we have a profit even though we have a bad yield.

B. with the closer spacing of the rows, corn plants will be forced to grow taller because of increased competition for sunlight from neighboring corn plants -Let them grow taller. We are worried about the cost.

C. with the larger number of plants growing per acre, more fertilizer will be required -This will weaken the answer, since the profits will actually reduce.

D. with the spacing between rows cut by half, the number of plants grown per acre will almost double -We already know this from the premise. This option doesn't tell us that the costs might reduce; since, there is an equal possibility of an increase in the cost of maintenance

E. with the closer spacing of the rows, the acreage on which corn is planted will be utilised much more intensively than it was before, requiring more frequent fallow years in which corn fields are left unplanted -Out of scope
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!

Preparing for RC my way

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4666
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2017, 15:37
ManishKM1 wrote:
Hi Experts,
I am not convinced with any of the explanations.
A) Doesn't explain why profit will be double, it might increase...but doubling!!!
B) The longer the plant, more could be the yield. Hence substantiating low yield issue. Still doesn't explain doubling of profit.
D) double yield still not sure.
Pls help.

Dear ManishKM1,

I'm happy to respond.

The GMAT CR is designed to prepare you for arguments in the real business world. Some GMAT CR arguments are waterproof, leaving us no doubts, and on others, we simply have to go with the most plausible option. It will be the same in the business world: sometimes you really are guaranteed, but many times, you have to take a gut-level guess and move on. Business people who wait for certainty each time go broke.

Here, we simply do not get an answer that guarantees the doubling. Sometimes the GMAT CR will not give you a 100% perfectly clear answer that guarantees the conclusion we want. Sometimes we just have to go with the most plausible answer. You have to have the intellectual agility to make this adjustment from question to question.

We know the plants will be more dense, and we know that each individual plant will have lower yield.

(A) tells us that another, unrelated big cost will drop--it's at least plausible that this could offset

(B) maybe the plants will be taller, but we know each plant will have a lower yield--no increase

(D) we already know this from the prompt: this adds zero new information

Choice (A) is not guaranteed of doubling, but it's the one that most plausibly conveys some kind of increase in profits.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2017
Posts: 112
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V30
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V29
GMAT 3: 630 Q49 V26
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.7
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2017, 20:11
mikemcgarry wrote:
ManishKM1 wrote:
Hi Experts,
I am not convinced with any of the explanations.
A) Doesn't explain why profit will be double, it might increase...but doubling!!!
B) The longer the plant, more could be the yield. Hence substantiating low yield issue. Still doesn't explain doubling of profit.
D) double yield still not sure.
Pls help.

Dear ManishKM1,

I'm happy to respond.

The GMAT CR is designed to prepare you for arguments in the real business world. Some GMAT CR arguments are waterproof, leaving us no doubts, and on others, we simply have to go with the most plausible option. It will be the same in the business world: sometimes you really are guaranteed, but many times, you have to take a gut-level guess and move on. Business people who wait for certainty each time go broke.

Here, we simply do not get an answer that guarantees the doubling. Sometimes the GMAT CR will not give you a 100% perfectly clear answer that guarantees the conclusion we want. Sometimes we just have to go with the most plausible answer. You have to have the intellectual agility to make this adjustment from question to question.

We know the plants will be more dense, and we know that each individual plant will have lower yield.

(A) tells us that another, unrelated big cost will drop--it's at least plausible that this could offset

(B) maybe the plants will be taller, but we know each plant will have a lower yield--no increase

(D) we already know this from the prompt: this adds zero new information

Choice (A) is not guaranteed of doubling, but it's the one that most plausibly conveys some kind of increase in profits.

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi mikemcgarry
Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense.
Re: A new machine for harvesting corn will allow rows to be planted only f &nbs [#permalink] 28 Oct 2017, 20:11

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 44 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.