It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 10:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 0

A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 15:05
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 7 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a certain bacterium. However, recently released data notes that the bacterium thrives in the presence of a certain virus, implying that it is actually the virus that causes the new disease.

Which of the following pieces of evidence would most support the dataâ€™s implication?

(A) In the absence of the virus, the disease has been observed to follow infection by the bacterium.
(B) The virus has been shown to aid the growth of bacterium, a process which often leads to the onset of the disease.
(C) The virus alone has been observed in many cases of the disease.
(D) In cases where the disease does not develop, infection by the bacterium is usually preceded by infection by the virus.
(E) Onset of the disease usually follows infection by both the virus and the bacterium.

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2302

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 0

Schools: Darden

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 15:50
This one is tricky. I think that A & C both say the same thing, that either the virus or the bacterium can cause the disease on its own.

I guess I will choose A. This piece of evidence shows that the bacterium can cause the disease without the virus; which refutes the conclusion that the disease is caused by the virus.

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 16:54
.
.
.
.
.
.
C

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 748

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 17:44
sperinko wrote:
A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a certain bacterium. However, recently released data notes that the bacterium thrives in the presence of a certain virus, implying that it is actually the virus that causes the new disease.

Which of the following pieces of evidence would most support the dataâ€™s implication?

(A) In the absence of the virus, the disease has been observed to follow infection by the bacterium.
(B) The virus has been shown to aid the growth of bacterium, a process which often leads to the onset of the disease.
(C) The virus alone has been observed in many cases of the disease.
(D) In cases where the disease does not develop, infection by the bacterium is usually preceded by infection by the virus.
(E) Onset of the disease usually follows infection by both the virus and the bacterium.

C for me.

The datas implication is : The disease is caused by the virus, not by the bacteria. We need to find evidence of the virus causing the disease.

A is out because it states the opposite, that the disease still can be contracted without the virus.
B says the virus aids the bacteria, making the bacteria central to cause of the disease.
D out of scope
E out of scope

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 22:29
Will go with C.

A - weakens
B - just shows a casual relationship between virus and bacteria. Doesnot help to support the implication.
D - weakens
E - no supoort.

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2006, 02:28
pelihu wrote:
This one is tricky. I think that A & C both say the same thing, that either the virus or the bacterium can cause the disease on its own.

I guess I will choose A. This piece of evidence shows that the bacterium can cause the disease without the virus; which refutes the conclusion that the disease is caused by the virus.

(A) suggests that in the absence of the virus, the disease occurs after a bacterial infection. No mention of the virus being the primary cause here, and therefore, not really supporting the conclusion.

(C) on the other hand isolates only the virus as being the leading cause of the disease. Indeed a tricky CR.

1:46

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

19 Aug 2006, 02:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.