It is currently 25 Sep 2017, 12:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Dedicated to crack GMAT and to find an admission in top B schoolm
Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 25 [2], given: 3

Schools: IESE, LBS, ISB
A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2011, 06:51
2
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (00:34) correct 21% (00:52) wrong based on 81 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

16.A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced back to a common root language.
(A) that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people can be traced
(B) that the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages of which all can be traced
(C) the world’s five billion people speak thousands of languages which are all traceable
(D) all of the thousands of languages spoken by the world’s five billion people to be traceable
(E) the ability to trace all of the thousands of languages that are spoken by the world’s five billion people
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 25 [2], given: 3

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 9

Re: A number of linguists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2011, 07:05
I chose A because Content that is correct...

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 9

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4278

Kudos [?]: 7633 [0], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A number of linguists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2011, 10:50
Yes. You do require the introductory connector ‘that’ in all reported speeches, lest it should become a run-on or an informal spoken form. . The choice is therefore limited to A and B

Between A and B: In B ‘speak thousands of languages of which all’ is weird and meaningless; ‘All of which’ is the right expression

A is left with a forthright presentation
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7633 [0], given: 363

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1988

Kudos [?]: 711 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A number of linguists [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2013, 07:16
daagh wrote:
Yes. You do require the introductory connector ‘that’ in all reported speeches, lest it should become a run-on or an informal spoken form. . The choice is therefore limited to A and B

Between A and B: In B ‘speak thousands of languages of which all’ is weird and meaningless; ‘All of which’ is the right expression

A is left with a forthright presentation


I choose A but what is the problem with E?

Kudos [?]: 711 [0], given: 355

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4278

Kudos [?]: 7633 [0], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2013, 22:06
The issue is not about the linguist’s contending their ability to trace back something to something. It is a general statement to say that these languages can be traced to a common root. By shifting the focus to the linguist’s ability, the meaning is altered.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7633 [0], given: 363

Re: A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of   [#permalink] 24 Sep 2013, 22:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.