It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 07:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: paris
A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2006, 13:10
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A number of linguists contend that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the worlds five billion people can be traced back to a common root language.

A. that all of the thousands of languages spoken by the worlds five billion people can be traced

B. that the worlds five billion people speak thousands of languages of which all can be traced

C. the worlds five billion people speak thousands of languages which are all traceable

D. all of the thousands of languages spoken by the worlds five billion people to be traceable

E. the ability to trace all of the thousands of languages that are spoken by the worlds five billion people
_________________

time is not on my side

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2006, 19:53
need contend - that . So C, D and E are out.
Between A and B, A.

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 840

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2006, 19:56
A seems fine.

Format: They contend that X can be traced to Y.

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2006, 20:01
Apostrophes are missing in both A and B

I would go with A.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: paris

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2006, 12:33
Can somebody explain why the passive form is preferred on this option?
between A and B
_________________

time is not on my side

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 734

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2006, 09:37
A for me.

Please explain why they are not using apostrophe for worlds like worlds'?

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida, Argentina, UK

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2006, 17:58
...that A it is, is unquestionable here.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2006, 23:40
although passively constructed, (A) stands here because of the correct becuase "contend that + theory"

5 billion people (actually over 6 billion now) is not what the linguists are emphasizing.

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 840

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 03:56
ugo_castelo wrote:
Can somebody explain why the passive form is preferred on this option?
between A and B

As GMATT73 has explained, it is the thousands of languages that can be traced rather than the 5 or 6 billion people themselves. The number of people is mentioned to qualify the languages part.
Take away the people part, you'll still retain meaning; but take away the languages part and the sentence falls apart.

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

26 Oct 2006, 03:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by