It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 22:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
6 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132631 [6], given: 12326

A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 07:26
6
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
54
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

51% (01:38) correct 49% (01:31) wrong based on 738 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights for photograph by placing them in two rows of three so that each person in the first row is standing in front of someone in the second row. The heights of the people within each row must increase from left to right, and each person in the second row must be taller than the person standing in front of him or her. How many such arrangements of the 6 people are possible?

(A) 5
(B) 6
(C) 9
(D) 24
(E) 36
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Kudos [?]: 132631 [6], given: 12326

Intern
Intern
avatar
Affiliations: CA - India
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Schools: ISB - Hyderabad, NSU - Singapore
Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 09:09
Let me try,

The arrangement will be something like this.

_ _ _
_ _ _

Position of A and F has to be fix i.t. bottom line left for A and upper line right for F. Other position needs to be filled-in by B, C, D and E.

B can be on right or A or behind A. So 2 positions possible. C can be on right of B or behind him or A, that means 3 possible positions. D and E will have to fit into the positions accordingly without any option. Hence the ans should be 2 X 3 = 6.

Is that right?

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 5

6 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 299

Kudos [?]: 362 [6], given: 9

Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 09:19
6
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer :)

Considering the arrangements:
4 5 6
1 2 3

2 4 6
1 3 5

2 5 6
1 3 4

3 4 6
1 2 5

3 5 6
1 2 4

Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A).

Kudos [?]: 362 [6], given: 9

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 299

Kudos [?]: 362 [1], given: 9

Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 09:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
gmattokyo wrote:
Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer :)

Considering the arrangements:
4 5 6
1 2 3

2 4 6
1 3 5

2 5 6
1 3 4

3 4 6
1 2 5

3 5 6
1 2 4

Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A).


Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins!

Kudos [?]: 362 [1], given: 9

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 296

Kudos [?]: 175 [1], given: 37

Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 09:31
1
This post received
KUDOS
I got 6 as answer too, manually arranging assuming 1,2,3,4,5,6 as heights (since each is different from other)

so possible positions are as below:

456 436
123 125

346 356
125 124

246 256
135 134

Kalpesh logic looks right to me... and is faster than listing possibilities
_________________

Thanks, Sri
-------------------------------
keep uppp...ing the tempo...

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip

Kudos [?]: 175 [1], given: 37

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 296

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 37

Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 09:33
gmattokyo wrote:
gmattokyo wrote:
Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer :)

Considering the arrangements:
4 5 6
1 2 3

2 4 6
1 3 5

2 5 6
1 3 4

3 4 6
1 2 5

3 5 6
1 2 4

Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A).


Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins!


u missed
436
125
:)
_________________

Thanks, Sri
-------------------------------
keep uppp...ing the tempo...

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 37

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 299

Kudos [?]: 362 [0], given: 9

Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 09:41
srini123 wrote:
gmattokyo wrote:
gmattokyo wrote:
Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer :)

Considering the arrangements:
4 5 6
1 2 3

2 4 6
1 3 5

2 5 6
1 3 4

3 4 6
1 2 5

3 5 6
1 2 4

Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A).


Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins!


u missed
436
125
:)


But 436 wouldn't be correct as from left to right it has to in increasing order and 4 is greater than 3.
Unless I'm not getting it?

Kudos [?]: 362 [0], given: 9

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 296

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 37

Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2009, 10:32
u missed
436
125
:)[/quote]

But 436 wouldn't be correct as from left to right it has to in increasing order and 4 is greater than 3.
Unless I'm not getting it?[/quote]


u r right, i got
436
125
incorrectly...

so the answer is 5 ?
_________________

Thanks, Sri
-------------------------------
keep uppp...ing the tempo...

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 37

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132631 [1], given: 12326

Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Oct 2009, 23:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED

Kudos [?]: 132631 [1], given: 12326

7 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 864

Kudos [?]: 1105 [7], given: 33

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Photo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 22:08
7
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Solution ( courtesy Manhattan GMAT staff)

BL BM BR
FL FM FR

("B" stands for "back", "F" stands for "front", "L" stands for "left", etc.)

Let's also assign "names" to each of the six people - 1 is the shortest, 2 is the next shortest, ... and 6 is the tallest.

Notice first that the only place where 6 can stand is in the BR position. A person standing in any of the other positions has to be shorter than at least one other person, and 6 isn't shorter than anybody.

By similar reasoning, we can see that the only place where 1 can stand is in the FL position. A person standing in any of the other positions has to be taller than at least one other person, and 1 isn't taller than anybody.

So we know that any possible arrangement will be of this form:

BL BM 6
1 FM FR

All we need to do is count possible ways of putting 2, 3, 4, and 5 in positions BL, BM, FM, and FR. In order to count possibilities, let's focus on who goes into the BL position. 1 and 6 are already fixed in their own positions. There's no way 5 could be in the BL position, because there would be no way to assign someone to BM such that the heights in the back row increased consistently from left to right. So we know that the person in the BL position has to be either 2, 3, or 4. We investigate each possibility in turn:

If 2 goes in the BL position, there are just two possibilities:

2 4 6
1 3 5

and

2 5 6
1 3 4

If 3 goes in the BL position, there are also two possibilities:

3 4 6
1 2 5

and

3 5 6
1 2 4

If 4 goes in the BL position, there is just one possible arrangement:

4 5 6
1 2 3

Counting these possibilities, we see that there are only 5 possible arrangements.

Kudos [?]: 1105 [7], given: 33

Retired Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 53

Concentration: Strategy, Other
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
Re: GOOD QUESTION [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2011, 05:11
Bunuel wrote:
Merging similar topics.

After you realize that the tallest and shortest have fixed positions you can just count possible arrangements without any formula.


I immediately figured out that Position 1 and 6 were fixed, but then I ended up wasting my time trying to find a formula for the whole thing. :? After a while I stopped trying to find a formula and just counted the possible combinations and came up with 5.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 53

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2015, 23:45
Here is a way to do this question without using brute force -

Assume the 6 people in ascending order of height are 1,2,3,4,5,6.

Let the positions be

A B C
D E F

Now, it is obvious that we have to fix 1 and 6 in the correct positions as shown below:

_ _ 6
1 _ _

Case 1:

Position A = 2

In that case, position B can only be 4 or 5, because, if B is 3, then both 4 and 5 will be greater than 3 (so, none can take positions E and F), and there won't be any case possible.

2 4 6
1 3 5

or

2 5 6
1 3 4

So, 2 solutions.

Case 2:

Position A = 3

In that case, position B cannot be 2. hence only 4 and 5 can take its place.

3 4 6
1 2 5

or

3 5 6
1 2 4

So, 2 solutions.

Case 3:

Position A = 4

In that case, position B can only be 5, and all other positions are also fixed.

4 5 6
1 2 3

So, 1 solution.

Hence, total solutions = 2 + 2 + 1 = 5

This can be done quite fast, but for the purpose of explaining, I have tried to be more elaborate.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 May 2015
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Schools: NUS '18
Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2015, 11:29
Hi,

Correct me if i am wrong.

Why cant it be like this.

465
123

We are still passing all the conditions.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 10120

Kudos [?]: 3506 [1], given: 173

Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2015, 21:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi All,

In Quant questions such as these, the number of possible arrangements is sometimes so limited that you can actually just list them out - in that way, you can visualize the solution and just do a bit of 'brute force' work:

Here, we're told to arrange 6 people (who all have DIFFERENT heights) into two rows of 3 so that each person in the first row is 'in front' of a taller person in the second row AND heights increase from 'left to right.' We're asked how many arrangements of people are possible.

If we label the six people as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (with 1 the shortest, and each number being 'taller' than the one immediately preceding it), we would have the following options...

456
123

356
124

346
125

256
134

246
135

There are NO other options.

Final Answer:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

Rich Cohen

Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin

Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
  Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee
www.empowergmat.com/

***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************

Kudos [?]: 3506 [1], given: 173

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 53

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2016, 15:23
I'm getting 15. Please see the attachment.
Attachments

SmartSelectImage_2016-01-04-17-10-34.png
SmartSelectImage_2016-01-04-17-10-34.png [ 52.43 KiB | Viewed 2335 times ]

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 53

Expert Post
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 10120

Kudos [?]: 3506 [0], given: 173

Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2016, 20:35
Hi kham71,

A number of your examples do NOT follow the 'restrictions' that were mentioned in the prompt. We're told that...

"The heights of the people within each row must INCREASE from left to right...."

So, while 123 would be allowed, 213 would NOT. Keeping that restriction in mind, how many of your possibilities can you eliminate?

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

Rich Cohen

Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin

Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
  Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee
www.empowergmat.com/

***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************

Kudos [?]: 3506 [0], given: 173

Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7736

Kudos [?]: 17782 [4], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2016, 22:44
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
ra011y wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Merging similar topics.

After you realize that the tallest and shortest have fixed positions you can just count possible arrangements without any formula.


I immediately figured out that Position 1 and 6 were fixed, but then I ended up wasting my time trying to find a formula for the whole thing. :? After a while I stopped trying to find a formula and just counted the possible combinations and came up with 5.



In addition to realising that Person1 (shortest) has to be in front and Person6 (tallest) has to be in the back row, you also need to realize that there is only one way of arranging the three people in the front and the three people in the back. If the front row has "Person1, Person2 and Person5", this is exactly how they will stand since they must be in increasing order of height from left to right.


________ __________ Person6
Person1 _________ _________

Now you have 4 people left (2, 3, 4,5) and you have to choose two of them for the front row. You can do it in 4C2 = 6 ways.
But note that you cannot choose both taller people (Person4 and Person5) for the front row because then you will have two shorter people left for the back row and Person3 will be behind Person4. Rest all cases are fine.

So number of ways = 6 - 1 = 5 ways

Answer (A)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17782 [4], given: 235

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 262

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 23

Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2016, 05:22
kalpeshchopada7 wrote:
Let me try,

The arrangement will be something like this.

_ _ _
_ _ _

Position of A and F has to be fix i.t. bottom line left for A and upper line right for F. Other position needs to be filled-in by B, C, D and E.

B can be on right or A or behind A. So 2 positions possible. C can be on right of B or behind him or A, that means 3 possible positions. D and E will have to fit into the positions accordingly without any option. Hence the ans should be 2 X 3 = 6.

Is that right?


You just got one thing wrong:

There's one position C is behind A so Be can't be behind A in that position. It's very important to keep track of repeated formations.

6-1 = 5
_________________

Kudos if I helped ;)

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 23

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 28 Sep 2013
Posts: 92

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 81

GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2016, 01:06
Bunuel wrote:
Time for OA.

OA: A (5)

The key here is to spot that the tallest (6) and shortest (1) have fixed positions and then count the possible arrangements of others.


Bunuel How will you solve the question.
_________________

Richa Champion | My GMAT Journey - 470 720 740

Target 760+

Not Improving after Multiple attempts. I can guide You.
Contact me richacrunch2@gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 81

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 112

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 31

Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2016, 15:19
I got this problem wrong when I encountered it during my practice test but looking at the solution and applying some reverse thinking I came up with following explanation which makes it little easier to quickly solve the problem.

Let's say we have 6 heights = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}

1st arrangement is obvious which is as following:

4 5 6 <- second row
1 2 3 <- first row

Now we need to think about other possible arrangements with given restrictions.

Couple of things we need to note:

1) Since 1 is smallest and 6 is greatest, they CANNOT be placed elsewhere from their current position. Hence their position is fixed and we need to only concern ourselves with position of rest of the 4 numbers i.e. {2, 3, 4, 5}

2) For other possible arrangements, the numbers from first row will have to go into second and from second row to 1 first row.

3) From {2, 3, 4, 5}, you cannot move both {2, 3} to second row (with {4, 5} moved to 1st row) as it will not satisfy the constraints in any arrangement.

4) Now looking at numbers just from second row, let's say if either of them has to placed in 1st row, they can only occupy 3rd position. Hence we have following two case:

Case 1: Placing {4} in third position of the first row, find arrangements of {2, 3, 5} that satisfy the constraints given in the problem.

_ _ 6
1 _ 4

Case 2: Placing {5} in third position of the first row, find arrangements of {2, 3, 4} that satisfy the constraints given in the problem.

_ _ 6
1 _ 5

In each of the two cases above, you will find two arrangements that satisfy constraints.

Case 1:
1st arrangement:
3 5 6
1 2 4
2nd arrangement:
2 5 6
1 3 4

Case 2:
1st arrangement:
3 4 6
1 2 5
2nd arrangement:
2 4 6
1 3 5


Hence, total arrangements: 1 + 2 + 2 = 5 arrangements.

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 31

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights   [#permalink] 30 Dec 2016, 15:19

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.