Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39673

A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 07:26
7
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
40
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
51% (02:25) correct
49% (01:45) wrong based on 559 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Intern
Affiliations: CA  India
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 45
Location: India
Schools: ISB  Hyderabad, NSU  Singapore

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:09
Let me try,
The arrangement will be something like this.
_ _ _ _ _ _
Position of A and F has to be fix i.t. bottom line left for A and upper line right for F. Other position needs to be filledin by B, C, D and E.
B can be on right or A or behind A. So 2 positions possible. C can be on right of B or behind him or A, that means 3 possible positions. D and E will have to fit into the positions accordingly without any option. Hence the ans should be 2 X 3 = 6.
Is that right?



Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 299

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:19
4
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer Considering the arrangements: 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 4 6 1 3 5 2 5 6 1 3 4 3 4 6 1 2 5 3 5 6 1 2 4 Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A).



Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 299

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:25
1
This post received KUDOS
gmattokyo wrote: Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer Considering the arrangements: 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 4 6 1 3 5 2 5 6 1 3 4 3 4 6 1 2 5 3 5 6 1 2 4 Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A). Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins!



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 300

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:31
1
This post received KUDOS
I got 6 as answer too, manually arranging assuming 1,2,3,4,5,6 as heights (since each is different from other) so possible positions are as below: 456 436 123 125 346 356 125 124 246 256 135 134 Kalpesh logic looks right to me... and is faster than listing possibilities
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 300

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:33
gmattokyo wrote: gmattokyo wrote: Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer Considering the arrangements: 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 4 6 1 3 5 2 5 6 1 3 4 3 4 6 1 2 5 3 5 6 1 2 4 Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A). Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins! u missed 436 125
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 299

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:41
srini123 wrote: gmattokyo wrote: gmattokyo wrote: Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer Considering the arrangements: 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 4 6 1 3 5 2 5 6 1 3 4 3 4 6 1 2 5 3 5 6 1 2 4 Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A). Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins! u missed 436 125 But 436 wouldn't be correct as from left to right it has to in increasing order and 4 is greater than 3. Unless I'm not getting it?



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 300

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 10:32
u missed 436 125 [/quote] But 436 wouldn't be correct as from left to right it has to in increasing order and 4 is greater than 3. Unless I'm not getting it?[/quote] u r right, i got 436 125 incorrectly... so the answer is 5 ?
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39673

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2009, 23:09
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED



Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 42

GOOD QUESTION [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2010, 16:20
A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights for photograph by placing them in two rows of three so that each person in the first row is standing in front of someone in the second row. The heights of the people within each row must increase from left to right, and each person in the second row must be taller than the person standing in front of him or her. How many such arrangements of the 6 people are possible?
A. 5 B. 6 C. 9 D. 24 E. 36
is there any algebric methode? I did it by finding all different configuration



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39673

Re: GOOD QUESTION [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2010, 16:29



Senior Manager
Status: Bring the Rain
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 400
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Michigan (Ross)  Class of 2014
GPA: 3.13
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Dec 2010, 12:25
Seems to be a very popular problem!
_________________
Go Blue!
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Director
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 871

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Dec 2010, 22:08
5
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Solution ( courtesy Manhattan GMAT staff)BL BM BR FL FM FR ("B" stands for "back", "F" stands for "front", "L" stands for "left", etc.) Let's also assign "names" to each of the six people  1 is the shortest, 2 is the next shortest, ... and 6 is the tallest. Notice first that the only place where 6 can stand is in the BR position. A person standing in any of the other positions has to be shorter than at least one other person, and 6 isn't shorter than anybody. By similar reasoning, we can see that the only place where 1 can stand is in the FL position. A person standing in any of the other positions has to be taller than at least one other person, and 1 isn't taller than anybody. So we know that any possible arrangement will be of this form: BL BM 6 1 FM FR All we need to do is count possible ways of putting 2, 3, 4, and 5 in positions BL, BM, FM, and FR. In order to count possibilities, let's focus on who goes into the BL position. 1 and 6 are already fixed in their own positions. There's no way 5 could be in the BL position, because there would be no way to assign someone to BM such that the heights in the back row increased consistently from left to right. So we know that the person in the BL position has to be either 2, 3, or 4. We investigate each possibility in turn: If 2 goes in the BL position, there are just two possibilities: 2 4 6 1 3 5 and 2 5 6 1 3 4 If 3 goes in the BL position, there are also two possibilities: 3 4 6 1 2 5 and 3 5 6 1 2 4 If 4 goes in the BL position, there is just one possible arrangement: 4 5 6 1 2 3 Counting these possibilities, we see that there are only 5 possible arrangements.



Current Student
Status: Up again.
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 533
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40 GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42

Re: Photo [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Feb 2011, 13:40
Good question to test logic.. Bunuel is this one of your own?
_________________
My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from620to710mygmatjourney114437.html



Retired Thread Master
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 147
Concentration: Strategy, Other
WE: Business Development (Consulting)

Re: GOOD QUESTION [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Feb 2011, 05:11
Bunuel wrote: Merging similar topics.
After you realize that the tallest and shortest have fixed positions you can just count possible arrangements without any formula. I immediately figured out that Position 1 and 6 were fixed, but then I ended up wasting my time trying to find a formula for the whole thing. After a while I stopped trying to find a formula and just counted the possible combinations and came up with 5.



Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1997
Concentration: Finance

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jun 2014, 16:38
Is there any combinatorics approach on this photograph questions? I hope I don't get one of these in the real exam, or should we just rely on brute force and counting outcomes? Cheers J Kudos for new approach to this problem



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15980

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jul 2015, 20:13
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



Intern
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Posts: 21

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2015, 23:45
Here is a way to do this question without using brute force 
Assume the 6 people in ascending order of height are 1,2,3,4,5,6.
Let the positions be
A B C D E F
Now, it is obvious that we have to fix 1 and 6 in the correct positions as shown below:
_ _ 6 1 _ _
Case 1:
Position A = 2
In that case, position B can only be 4 or 5, because, if B is 3, then both 4 and 5 will be greater than 3 (so, none can take positions E and F), and there won't be any case possible.
2 4 6 1 3 5
or
2 5 6 1 3 4
So, 2 solutions.
Case 2:
Position A = 3
In that case, position B cannot be 2. hence only 4 and 5 can take its place.
3 4 6 1 2 5
or
3 5 6 1 2 4
So, 2 solutions.
Case 3:
Position A = 4
In that case, position B can only be 5, and all other positions are also fixed.
4 5 6 1 2 3
So, 1 solution.
Hence, total solutions = 2 + 2 + 1 = 5
This can be done quite fast, but for the purpose of explaining, I have tried to be more elaborate.



Intern
Joined: 18 May 2015
Posts: 1

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Sep 2015, 11:29
Hi,
Correct me if i am wrong.
Why cant it be like this.
465 123
We are still passing all the conditions.



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 9271
Location: United States (CA)
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Sep 2015, 21:07
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Hi All, In Quant questions such as these, the number of possible arrangements is sometimes so limited that you can actually just list them out  in that way, you can visualize the solution and just do a bit of 'brute force' work: Here, we're told to arrange 6 people (who all have DIFFERENT heights) into two rows of 3 so that each person in the first row is 'in front' of a taller person in the second row AND heights increase from 'left to right.' We're asked how many arrangements of people are possible. If we label the six people as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (with 1 the shortest, and each number being 'taller' than the one immediately preceding it), we would have the following options... 456 123 356 124 346 125 256 134 246 135 There are NO other options. Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************




Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
02 Sep 2015, 21:07



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 28 posts ]




