GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Jun 2018, 12:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2525
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2014, 23:24
BPD wrote:
The correct answer should be B and most of us have selected B but on selecting B, the answer choice B is indicated in RED as the wrong answer and answer choice C is higlighted in green to indicate that it is the correct answer. Is anyone else facing this issue?


Hi BPD,

The question poster has posted the wrong correct option. That is why you are facing this issue. You are right: the correct option is B.

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Posts: 107
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2014, 23:30
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 95
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2016, 01:13
Hi, is the 2nd bold face conclusion of the argument? I think conclusion is that company is not mismanaged. 2nd bold face in this case is concluding about - 'manager can ever be anything other than counterproductiv'.
So i dont think its manin conclusion of the argument. Though this choice is better than rest of the choices.
Can an expert explain plz.
Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 May 2016
Posts: 122
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2017, 22:21
it is clearly not justified is a conclusion via author .. so directly C and E.
and first is a view point of the investor ...so cann't be evidence.. Hence C
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 60
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 580 Q41 V28
GPA: 3.8
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2017, 09:58
GMATNinja I got confused between C & D. Can anybody help
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1290
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2017, 05:23
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(B) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position being opposed.
(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.
(E) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

GMATNinjaTwo Could you help to assist to analyse this question? Does the word "clearly" is a hint for the conclusion? Perhaps you could provide the explanations for the transition word in this argument. I have a hard time to identify the conclusion of the argument. Thank you.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3649
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2017, 10:38
1
hazelnut wrote:
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(B) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position being opposed.
(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.
(E) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

GMATNinjaTwo Could you help to assist to analyse this question? Does the word "clearly" is a hint for the conclusion? Perhaps you could provide the explanations for the transition word in this argument. I have a hard time to identify the conclusion of the argument. Thank you.


Hi hazelnut ,

My two cents here brother :)

Always remember the marker words to determine the conclusion or the premise. Some of these markers for conclusion are clearly, therefore, hence, thus, claimed, etc.

For premises, we have Since, because, the reason is, etc.

Now, in this question we have two claims:

1. The prominent investor claim. "the company is mismanaged"
2. The author's claim stated by the word clearly . "in this case it is clearly not justified".

Now, you to determine which is a conclusion and which is a premise:

You can always use AB test.

Is A because of B? --> Then A is the conclusion

Is B because of A.? --> Then B is the conclusion.

Other than this, try to find out what the author is trying to say and then what he has used as an extra information to prove his point. The extra information will be the premise and the author's point will be the conclusion.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
NEW VISA FORUM - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

How to use an Error Log? Check out my tips!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1749
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2017, 19:10
1
merajul wrote:
I got confused between C & D. Can anybody help

Quote:
(C) the first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.


Here's the argument, rearranged somewhat:

  • There has been a recent rise in Burton's inventory of finished products.
  • An increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand.
  • But, in Burton's case, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.
  • This implies that Burton's production is NOT outstripping demand and that there is no reason to slow production. This undermines the evidence cited by the investor, in support of the investor's position that the company is mismanaged.
  • Therefore, the investor's criticism of management is clearly not justified (conclusion).

The first boldfaced section, "the company is mismanaged", is the position of the prominent investor, not evidence to support the investor's position. The evidence cited to support that position is "the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products", and this portion is not boldfaced.

The second boldfaced section, "in this case [the investor's sniping at management] is clearly not justified", does not undermine the evidence cited above ("the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products"). Stating that the investor's sniping was not justified does not, by itself, undermine the evidence. Rather, the second portion is the conclusion of the author's argument.

Thus, choice (C) accurately expresses the roles of the two boldfaced portions.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 60
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 580 Q41 V28
GPA: 3.8
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2017, 21:09
GMATNinja wrote:
merajul wrote:
I got confused between C & D. Can anybody help

Quote:
(C) the first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.


Here's the argument, rearranged somewhat:

  • There has been a recent rise in Burton's inventory of finished products.
  • An increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand.
  • But, in Burton's case, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.
  • This implies that Burton's production is NOT outstripping demand and that there is no reason to slow production. This undermines the evidence cited by the investor, in support of the investor's position that the company is mismanaged.
  • Therefore, the investor's criticism of management is clearly not justified (conclusion).

The first boldfaced section, "the company is mismanaged", is the position of the prominent investor, not evidence to support the investor's position. The evidence cited to support that position is "the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products", and this portion is not boldfaced.

The second boldfaced section, "in this case [the investor's sniping at management] is clearly not justified", does not undermine the evidence cited above ("the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products"). Stating that the investor's sniping was not justified does not, by itself, undermine the evidence. Rather, the second portion is the conclusion of the author's argument.

Thus, choice (C) accurately expresses the roles of the two boldfaced portions.


Thank You Sir. It's clear now.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 705
Premium Member
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 14:16
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 145
GPA: 3.72
Reviews Badge
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2017, 03:29
Please Note - I have no doubt about the correct answer option of the bold face choice question.

Here is a question from Boldface section of the OG -

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
(B) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position being opposed.
(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.
(E) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

Again, What do you think should be the Primary Purpose for the passage written above?

IMO, it is clearly a highly opinionated passage in which the author concludes that claim by the investor is not justified. The response to the Primary Purpose question would be something like-
1-"Discarding the view point of an investor."
2-"Opposing the opinion/ judgement of an investor."

But the OG explanation says that

"The first boldfaced portion
expresses the investor’s claim that the company is mismanaged. The argument asserts, in
the second boldfaced portion, that this claim by the investor is unjustified. The passage
then goes on to support this assertion."

Does that mean that the passage is just an assertion and doesn't has any strong opinion?

So, again the OG's explanation seems contrary to my understanding about the passage as a whole. Am I missing something here?
_________________

A lot needs to be learned from all of you.

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 145
GPA: 3.72
Reviews Badge
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2017, 03:30
GMATNinja your suggestion would help us a lot.
_________________

A lot needs to be learned from all of you.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 8
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2017, 03:36
venksune wrote:
The first is a position and second is conclusion. C rightly identifies that.


Why the conclusion of this paragraph was not "the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers?"
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 744
Premium Member
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2017, 11:37
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

The passage starts by saying that a prominent investor CLAIMED (not a fact as it can be challenged) that “THE COMPANY IS MISMANAGED”. Why?
Comma+verb-ing answers the why. What follows citing is an evidence used to support the first bold face.

Here comes a contrast (doubtful/whether). Bold face 2 is again a conclusion. Then what comes next is information to support the second bold face.


In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
Second is also a conclusion.

(B) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position being opposed.
INCORRECT

(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
Correct

(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.
First is claim (conclusion).

(E) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
Same as D.
_________________

Help me make my explanation better by providing a logical feedback.

If you liked the post, HIT KUDOS !!

Don't quit.............Do it.

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 744
Premium Member
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 08 Sep 2017, 22:01
2
tringuyenminh293 wrote:
venksune wrote:
The first is a position and second is conclusion. C rightly identifies that.


Why the conclusion of this paragraph was not "the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers?"


When stuck between what is fact and what is conclusion, always ask:
1) Can it be proved?
2) Can it be questioned/challenged?


in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

1) It is CLEARLY not justified BECAUSE the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

OR
2) The increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers BECAUSE it is CLEARLY not justified.

Originally posted by Shiv2016 on 07 Sep 2017, 11:43.
Last edited by Shiv2016 on 08 Sep 2017, 22:01, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 8
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2017, 17:31
Thanks Shiv2016 for helpful explanation.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 277
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Investment Banking (Venture Capital)
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2017, 11:41
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


(A) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
- BF 2 is NOT evidence!

(B) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position being opposed.
- Same as "A"

(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
- correct as is

(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.
- BF 1 is NOT evidence!

(E) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
- Same as "D"

Really easy -- you don't have to even analyze the conclusion here. Just read A/C (somewhat) carefully. Pretty straightforward to tell what "evidence" and what "claims" look like/sound like

Kudos please if you find this helpful :)
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan   [#permalink] 16 Sep 2017, 11:41

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 57 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.