It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 15:09

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2004
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 150 [4], given: 0

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Oct 2004, 22:09
4
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (01:40) correct 26% (01:39) wrong based on 1548 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.

(B) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support the position being opposed.

(C) The first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides information to undermine the force of that evidence.

(E) The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

Similar question from GMATPrep : LINK
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 01 Oct 2017, 02:12, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 150 [4], given: 0

Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 891

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Oct 2004, 22:25
The first is a position and second is conclusion. C rightly identifies that.

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 590

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Oct 2004, 23:12
C as venksune pointed.
Nevertheless, neither first nor second is an evidence leaving all the other four choices to be wrong ones.

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Oct 2004, 23:16
agree with C. It was my first hunch also as none of the portion is substantiated so none can be evidence or provide any evidence
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 891

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2004, 09:26
In B, the first part is fine...the second part in this case it is clearly not justified is a conclusive statement. The further part beyond this bold statment further substantiates this conclusive statement.

The only evidence in the stimulus is the middle part wherein slow production, inventory stuff is discussed. This same evidence is inferred in multiple ways once by the investor and then by the author with the author giving addl data that there is nascent demand for which the inventory is piled up.

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 4 [2], given: 0

Location: Atlanta , GA
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 May 2005, 12:15
2
KUDOS
First is not an evidence so A and B are rejected .
Second if not an evidence so D and E are rejected .

Hence C

Kudos [?]: 4 [2], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Lontano da dove
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 May 2005, 00:29
Another one for C. A, B, and D just do not reflect the second part in bold.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Aug 2005, 08:49
I am still not able to refute B.

Doesn't this part is evdience" Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers. " is not that evdience?
S
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jun 2006, 18:39
We should look for answers pertain/match only Bold Faced phrases/sentences.

In the above CR, 'Investor's argument is not clearly justified' is the conclusion.

and not an evidence.

Hence Not B.

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1884

Kudos [?]: 378 [1], given: 0

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jun 2006, 19:39
1
KUDOS
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companyâ€™s failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investorâ€™s sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtonâ€™s case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

C, the first states the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole;

E, The first is evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole;

It's easier to immediately point out that the second bold face is the conclusion of the argument --> C and E stand.
Now look at the first bold face, it doesn't sound like an evidence --> eliminate E

C is good.

Kudos [?]: 378 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 13

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 02:33
I m finding these Bold Face CRs a bit difficult to handle. Is there a methodology that we can adapt to solve such kind of questions.

Overall he opposes the initial premise that the company is mismanaged. And the second statement is an explanation to prove that the company is not mismanaged.

IMO B for this question.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 13

Manager
Status: Berkeley Haas 2013
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 16

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 10:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I think it should be C

The first bold part as a whole mentions that investor claimed company is being mismanaged which if you read the whole para carefully is being refuted by the author.
The second bold face mentions that basically what the investor said is wrong. It continues to provide reasons why investor is wrong.

C is the best answer because 1st part provides a position with which the argument as a whole disagrees. The second bold face is on a high level the overall conclusion

What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2009, 19:06
IMO C.

the company is mismanaged ::::: This is a position that is finally refuted.

but in this case it is clearly not justified ::: This is the conclusion of the argument on the whole.
_________________

Regards,
Saaquib

If you find any grammatical mistake in my post please don't hesitate in pointing out.

Please +1 if you find this post useful.

My Blog

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Current Student
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 65

Location: India
Schools: ISB '17 (A), IIMA (A)
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2009, 21:18
IMO C.

The first boldface has been disproved, once you read the entire argument.

The second boldface "but in this case it is clearly not justified" does not provide any evidence, but looking at the argument as a whole, it seems to be a conclusion. Hence, C.

What's OA?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 65

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 588 [1], given: 22

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2009, 19:44
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
acer2knight wrote:
I m finding these Bold Face CRs a bit difficult to handle. Is there a methodology that we can adapt to solve such kind of questions.

Hey i have attached a file , which is not prepared by me, but someone, it contains all the details of how to approach CR questions, including Bold Face CRs, go to the end of the document to read about Bold Face and follow the same method to solve Bold Face CRs, it will really help you, it not only worked for me but also many. Good Luck
Attachments

File comment: CR.notes

Kudos [?]: 588 [1], given: 22

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 228

Kudos [?]: 294 [2], given: 25

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Dec 2009, 06:31
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.

B. The 1st states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusion

C. The 1st is the position that the argument as a whole opposes;the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.

D. The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the 2nd states the conclusion of the argument as a whole

E. The 1st & the 2nd both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a whole.

Edit: Changed the answer to the correct OA

Kudos [?]: 294 [2], given: 25

Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 13 [3], given: 1

Schools: INSEAD- WL, IE - Apr 2011
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Dec 2009, 12:39
3
KUDOS

Conclusion of the passage:It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified

Second boldface statement offers an intermediate conclusion (or premise) and the succeeding sentence provides reasoning to that conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 13 [3], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2009
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 50 [2], given: 4

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Dec 2009, 13:20
2
KUDOS
These types are always hard to me. The first step I took was to identify the conclusion. The conclusion was the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers. Therefore, D because both of the mini-conclusions support it. What is the correct answer?

Kudos [?]: 50 [2], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 4

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Dec 2009, 10:03
The OA is B

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 104 [2], given: 38

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Apr 2010, 03:47
2
KUDOS
IMO B. It should be the conclusion as it answers the doubt.

Kudos [?]: 104 [2], given: 38

Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan   [#permalink] 08 Apr 2010, 03:47

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 68 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by