It is currently 25 Nov 2017, 03:06

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys

Author Message
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Sep 2008, 10:11
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.

A. secondarily, for their failure to

B. secondly, for their failure to

C. secondly, that they failed and did not

D. second, that they failed to

E. second, for failing to

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 445 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

01 Sep 2008, 10:41
rao_1857 wrote:
A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.

A. secondarily, for their failure to

B. secondly, for their failure to

C. secondly, that they failed and did not

D. second, that they failed to

E. second, for failing to

My pick is E. They or their seem to refer to the city's election board which is singular.

Also E is parallel for failing to replace, for failing to investigate.

Kudos [?]: 445 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 348

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

01 Sep 2008, 11:55
rao_1857 wrote:
A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.

A. secondarily, for their failure to

B. secondly, for their failure to

C. secondly, that they failed and did not

D. second, that they failed to

E. second, for failing to

I will go with E- First of all, failing to.... Second for failing to.... is parallel. None of the others have this parallelism.
_________________

To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:
"Leave no stone unturned."
-Edward Bulwer Lytton

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1092 [0], given: 5

Location: New York

Show Tags

01 Sep 2008, 15:03
rao_1857 wrote:
A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.

A. secondarily, for their failure to

B. secondly, for their failure to

C. secondly, that they failed and did not

D. second, that they failed to

E. second, for failing to

First .. second parallel..

A,B,C are out.

D -- Subject-verb issue

E is the best.
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1092 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 187

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Sep 2008, 06:59
"failing to replace"...."failing to investigate". Is E

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 187

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

19 Sep 2008, 06:59
IMO E. We need parallelism: "failing to replace"...."failing to investigate"

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: SC NY times   [#permalink] 19 Sep 2008, 06:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.