A recent report determined that although only three percent : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Feb 2017, 19:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A recent report determined that although only three percent

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 248 [9] , given: 0

A recent report determined that although only three percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 06:02
9
KUDOS
99
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (03:34) correct 51% (02:50) wrong based on 3010 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 141
Location: Hockeytown
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [11] , given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 23:20
11
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Only a tiny fraction of people have the radar detectors. However, one-third of tickets go to people with radar detectors.

Radar detectors are associated with increased incidence of tickets.

But how do we know that those getting caught are speeding regularly?

You don't, unless you assume it (B).

Very tricky because of all the verbiage.
Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 598
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 220 [1] , given: 0

A recent report determined that although only three percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 04:33
1
KUDOS
171. A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not. The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.
Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 218
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 06:10
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
saurya_s wrote:
171. A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not. The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.

B must be the answer. The argument cites high incidence of radar-equipped cars BEING TICKETED but derives a conclusion about how often these cars EXCEEDED THE SPEED LIMIT. Clearly, in the author's opinion those drivers who are often ticketed often exceed the speed limit. Thus, B is the missing link
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 125
Location: US
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 07:06
B.

Only B can be the assumption. All the others does not say how the conclusion - drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not can be arrived.
Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 53
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 08:28
2
KUDOS
I think the answer is D.

Assuming there are 1000 drivers on Maryland highways. 3% or 30 cars are equipped with radar detectors.

Let's say 200 cars were ticketed for speeding. 33% or 66 cars were equipped with radar detectors. this means that some cars were ticketed more than once, else one can't have 66 cars with radar detectors with originally 30 cars equipped with radar detectors.

D states this assumption.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 273
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 10:30
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
kedar1972 wrote:
I think the answer is D.

Assuming there are 1000 drivers on Maryland highways. 3% or 30 cars are equipped with radar detectors.

Let's say 200 cars were ticketed for speeding. 33% or 66 cars were equipped with radar detectors. this means that some cars were ticketed more than once, else one can't have 66 cars with radar detectors with originally 30 cars equipped with radar detectors.

D states this assumption.

Be careful when assigning arbitrary numbers to a problem dealing with percentages. If you were to choose 10 tickets assigned, and 1000 drivers, the 'assumption' is not necessary.

The conclusion
Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not

The conclusion is "more likely to speed regularly", this at the least requires some connection between regular speeding at ticket assignment.

B is this assumption.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 366
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 10:38
SigEpUCI, nice explanation dear
We can look at this too:
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... t=maryland

Dharmin
_________________

Perseverance, Hard Work and self confidence

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

A recent report determined that although only three percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2005, 23:06
A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their
vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were
equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed
the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.
The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed
limit than are drivers who do not.
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly
than are drivers who are not ticketed.
(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of
vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the
time period covered by the report.
(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state
highways not covered in the report.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 367 [6] , given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2005, 23:44
6
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
3% of drivers on maryland highways equip their vehicles with radar detectors
31% of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equip with them
Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed speed lmiit regularly than driver who do not <-- conclusion

(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
- does not hold up the conclusion

(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
This one holds up the conclusion. We're told a large percentage of vehicles with radar detectors were ticketed for speeding. Then (B) says those who are ticketed are likely to exceed the speed limit regularly. So the conclusion that vehicles with radar detectors exceed the speed limit regularly is true.

(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
- not important.

(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
- does not help the conclusion

(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.
- out of scope
Director
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 863
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2005, 00:10
Manager
Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 65
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 0

A recent report determined that although only three percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2005, 04:36
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
A Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
B Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
C The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
D Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
E Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.

OA is a few posts below.

Source â€“ GMATPrep by Pearson VUE

Last edited by Pauline on 06 Aug 2005, 23:23, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 282
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2005, 18:32
B

From
A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers
...

to the more general conclusion that: Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed ...

We need to assume that the reported case is happening on a regular basis.

Hence
B Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 162
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

A recent report determined that although only 3% of drivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2005, 09:49
A recent report determined that although only 3% of drivers on maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, 33% of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

a) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.

b) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.

c) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with rdar detectors.

d) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.

e) Drivers on Maryland highways exceded teh speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.

Pls share us your answer and explanation. Thanks.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 484
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2005, 10:57
B it is, if B is false, then people who exceed speed limit regularly may not get ticket and somebody who exceed speed limit only once gets caught unfortunately, then the argument falls apart.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 162
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 10:13
The OA is B.

Here is the official explanation.

The conclusion concerns regularly exceeding the speed limit, but the data derive from isolated occasions when drivers exceed the speed limit and are ticketed. The conclusion thus assumes that these instances provice evidence of regular behavior - that drivers ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are likely to be drivers who regularly exceed it. Choice B states this assumption and is the best answer.

Choices A, C, and D provide additional data that might be relevant to the conclusion, but if Choice B is assumed, then additional data are unnecessary for drawing the conclusion. The difference that choice E describes between Maryland and other states would simply suggest that the report's findings cannot be extrapolated to other states. Id does not help in drawing the conclusion.

What I just don't get is the bold line in the explanation. Can someone help me out here?
Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 162
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

A recent report determined that although only 3% of drivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 10:13
This topic have been merged with: http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic-1378.html
Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 100
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

A recent report determined that although only three percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2006, 14:52
A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.
(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1348
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Drivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2006, 18:07
though i am little confused, go with D.

(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 100
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2006, 17:15
The conclusion concerns regularly exceeding the speed limit, but the data derive from isolated occasions when drivers exceed the speed limit and are ticketed. The conclusion thus assumes that these instances provide evidence of regular behavior-that drivers ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are likely to be drivers who regularly exceed it. Choice B states this assumption and is the best answer. Choices A, C, and D provide additional data that might be relevant to the conclusion, but if choice B is assumed, the additional data are unnecessary for drawing the conclusion. The difference that choice E describes between Maryland and other states would simply suggest that the reportâ€™s findings cannot be extrapolated to other states. It does not help in drawing the conclusion.
16 Feb 2006, 17:15

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5   6   7    Next  [ 129 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A recent report determined that although only three percent 0 13 Jan 2013, 11:54
A recent report determined that although only three percent 0 18 Mar 2012, 21:41
A recent report determined that although only three percent 0 28 May 2012, 02:58
A recent report determined that although only three percent 0 03 Nov 2009, 12:25
A recent report determined that although only three percent 0 13 Dec 2008, 16:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A recent report determined that although only three percent

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.