It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 05:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEOs now earn

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 161

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEOs now earn [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2006, 21:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEOâ€™s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEOâ€™s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

B. that, on average, CEOâ€™s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

C. that, on average, CEOâ€™s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

D. CEOâ€™s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

E. CEOâ€™s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida, Argentina, UK

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2006, 22:36
My vote for C.
The sentence needs to continue with "that" and only C matches with the last "in 1980" (if not it should read, "42 times that in 1980").

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2006, 22:39

The ratio clearly references back to the 419 times.
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2006, 23:00
sangarelli wrote:

The ratio clearly references back to the 419 times.

Got B too. Also the 'their' in C in ambiguos.

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 373

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2006, 23:29
would you say 'times more' is redundant? i don't think it is as it could be 'times less' but .....

i think maybe their is a slight comparison problem in A, but i think C is pretty poorly constructed too.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2006, 07:14
sangarelli wrote:

The ratio clearly references back to the 419 times.

42 times what in 1980?

(C)

"indicates that~"

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 577

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: France

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2006, 07:23
All seem to be weird but choose C even if I don't know if "as compared to" is correct. The others are worse...

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: NYC

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2006, 10:41
C

i could be wrong about this, but the way this is set up, x times more than _____ sounds weird, i prefer x times ______.

so for me that narrows down to B, C, E. E is definitely wrong.

between B and C, B needs something at the end of it

a ratio that compares to 42 times _____ in 1980. (their pay, something like that needs to be in there)

so C it is. not wild about it though.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2006, 18:01
C for parallelism.

I believe there should not be any apostrophes in CEOs.

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2006, 07:10
GMATT73 wrote:
sangarelli wrote:

The ratio clearly references back to the 419 times.

42 times what in 1980?

(C)

"indicates that~"

I was somewhat confused in picking B and C, then who is "their" referring to? CEOs or workers?

I am still undecided lol. I'll still go with B because their just seems to bother me

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2006, 08:50
uvs_mba wrote:
GMATT73 wrote:
sangarelli wrote:

The ratio clearly references back to the 419 times.

42 times what in 1980?

(C)

"indicates that~"

I was somewhat confused in picking B and C, then who is "their" referring to? CEOs or workers?

I am still undecided lol. I'll still go with B because their just seems to bother me

Unless there is a typo, the sentence should read CEO's (possessive) not CEOs (plural). Had it been the latter case, then we would need to shift the apostrophe.

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2006, 09:39
GMATT73 wrote:
uvs_mba wrote:
GMATT73 wrote:
sangarelli wrote:

The ratio clearly references back to the 419 times.

42 times what in 1980?

(C)

"indicates that~"

I was somewhat confused in picking B and C, then who is "their" referring to? CEOs or workers?

I am still undecided lol. I'll still go with B because their just seems to bother me

Unless there is a typo, the sentence should read CEO's (possessive) not CEOs (plural). Had it been the latter case, then we would need to shift the apostrophe.

Finally found the bummer, it was a burried thread, sorry Matt but the "their" was just bothering me so I went looking for the thread.

http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=13662

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Indianapolis

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2006, 16:26
on a side note - is "419 times more pay than .." an idiomatically correct form and is it equivalent to "419 times the pay .." ?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 161

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2006, 20:54
OA is C =)

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2006, 05:41
This is one of the most posted topics from GMATPrep. OA is C, but it is a very hard question to get it right.

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2006, 20:17
alobs wrote:
on a side note - is "419 times more pay than .." an idiomatically correct form and is it equivalent to "419 times the pay .." ?

Need not be. In PS, we take 100% more means double the number and not equal to the number.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

27 Nov 2006, 20:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEOs now earn

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.