nitya34 wrote:
A recent study demonstrated that parents living with children consume nearly five more grams of fat per day, on average, than do adults living without children. The higher fat intake among these parents is probably attributable to their snacking on the pizza and cookies that tend to be plentiful in households with children.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken this explanation of the parents' higher fat intake?
A. On average, households with children spend $15 more per week on pizza and cookies than do households without children.
B. Households with children purchase much more whole milk, which has a high fat content, than do households without children.
C. Children consume most of the pizza and cookies in any given household.
D. Parents ought to set a good example for their children, in dietary choices as in other matters.
E. Not all parents living with children consume more grams of fat than do adults living without children.
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
The first sentence is a premise, which we can take as a statement of fact. The second sentence is a claim made by the author: that the source of the extra fat grams is pizza and cookies. We are asked to weaken this claim;
note that we need to tear down the conclusion, not the premise.
(A)
Strengthen. This choice supports the conclusion with evidence that households with children tend to have more pizza and cookies present.
(
B)
CORRECT. Weaken. This choice presents
whole milk as an alternative source for the extra grams of fat, and thereby weakens the conclusion that the extra fat
must be from pizza and cookies.
(C)
Irrelevant. Children may consume most of the pizza and cookies, but the remainder could be consumed by their parents. This answer choice does not provide enough information to address the conclusion that the adults eat more pizza and cookies than they would if no children were present.
(D)
Irrelevant. This argument starts with a premise about what parents
actually do, and attempts to explain their behavior. Statements about what parents
ought to be doing are not relevant to the argument.
(E)
Irrelevant. This argument is about how to explain the higher fat intake of the
average parent living with children. The fact that
some parents are not average is both unsurprising and irrelevant.