It is currently 24 Feb 2018, 23:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent study has found that within the past few years,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3092
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2017, 02:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
YangYichen wrote:
could you please elaborate on 'Once outside or Twice Inside" rule?


Sure.

As per this rule, we can have either "to both X and Y" or "both to X and to Y".

Notice, in the first one I kept to outside once and this would be used for both X and Y while in the second one, I used to with both X and Y. Hence, in the letter part we have Twice Inside.

Here are the great questions that work on the same principle.

https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-para ... ce-inside/
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?


How to use this forum in THE BEST way?

Magoosh Discount CodesMath Revolution Discount Codese-GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 06 Jun 2013
Posts: 191
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Tuck
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 09:18
him1985 wrote:
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors had elected early retirement rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

(A) had elected early retirement rather than face- singular verb
(B) had elected early retirement instead of facing - singular verb
(C) have elected retiring early instead of facing - parallelism
(D) have elected to retire early rather than facing - To Retire and to face must be parallel
(E) have elected to retire early rather than face


let's concentrate only on D and E as there explanation in this thread is enough for eliminating A, B and C.

first ask yourself what are the two options doctors have ?

these two options are (1) early retirement and (2) face threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

here we are are considering face threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance. as the second option. we should not consider face threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance as two separate options. these two are part of the second option for the doctors.

now let's see which answer choice is correct. keep in mind two main options for doctors should be parallel.

D. to retire rather than facing ( not at all parallel) -- incorrect
E. to retire rather than (to) face (parallel) -- correct
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 May 2017
Posts: 3
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 09:51
Please suggest why C is incorrect

I am confused between C & E. I think both have parallel structures.
C : have elected <verb> instead of <verb>
E : have elected to <verb> than <verb>

Thanks,
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 27 Mar 2014
Posts: 111
Schools: ISB '19, IIMA , IIMB
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 17:21
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors had elected early retirement rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

(A) had elected early retirement rather than face
->Use of past perfect is incorrect.
(B) had elected early retirement instead of facing
->same as A
(C) have elected retiring early instead of facing
X instead of Y ; X & Y must be parallel , have elected & facing are not parallel . Incorrect
(D) have elected to retire early rather than facing
same as C
(E) have elected to retire early rather than face
Correct


Experts pls. comment
VP
VP
User avatar
P
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1139
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
CAT Tests
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 19:55
redferrocene wrote:
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors had elected early retirement rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

(A) had elected early retirement rather than face
(B) had elected early retirement instead of facing
(C) have elected retiring early instead of facing
(D) have elected to retire early rather than facing
(E) have elected to retire early rather than face

[Reveal] Spoiler: OE
OG Verbal Review 2, SC#39

Verb form; Parallelism

For action that started in the past and continues into the present, it is correct to use the present perfect tense: have elected. When a choice is presented using the rather than construction-the doctors ha'ue chosen x rather than y-the x and the y must be parallel. In this case, the doctors have chosen to retire rather than (to understood) face. To does not need to be repeated in order to maintain parallelism because it is understood.

(A) Had elected shows an action completed in the past; early retirement is not parallel to face.
(B) Had elected shows an action completed in the past; retirement and facing are not parallel.
(C) Have elected must be followed by an infinitive (to retire).
(D) Facing and to retire early are not parallel.
(E) Correct. In this sentence, have elected shows action continuing into the present; to retire and (to understood) face are parallel.

The correct answer is E.


The answer is E
We have to use have because the sentence is in present perfect tense as the effects are still going or we are taking about the event still.
Also the rather than is better in this context than instead of
elect to retire early is correct .
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 482
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 22:19
Elected Retiring is wrong.
Correct idiom is X elected to do Y.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Oct 2017
Posts: 27
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2017, 14:55
daagh wrote:
The verb setting of the main clause (‘has found’) is in present perfect. To avoid shift of tense, one has to maintain present perfect in the subordinate clause also. hence A and B are out. Among C, D and E, C is out because of using instead of. Rather than is the right choice because rather than shows contrast, while instead of just meaning ‘in the place of’ does not effuse contrast.

In D, to retire ….. than facing is not parallel. E is the best choice. To retire, an infinitive, matches face, elliptically meaning to face


Dear daagh your explanation makes myself confused about the timing of the events, as you can only study the retirements that have alredy happended, the structure of the timing shift (IMO) should be similiar to the reported speech, as you point "have found" is in the present, but the timing of the retirments is in the past few years, so the timing should point an action that alredy happended.... so if the answer choices allowed only "retired" (past) would that be preferable to "have retired" (inmediate past)?

Kind Regards
DP
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1916
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2018, 06:46
A recent study has found that within the past few years, many doctors had elected early retirement rather than face the threats of lawsuits and the rising costs of malpractice insurance.

(A) had elected early retirement rather than face - past perfect had elected is incorrect
(B) had elected early retirement instead of facing - same as A
(C) have elected retiring early instead of facing - instead of is used to show a preference
(D) have elected to retire early rather than facing - to retire is not parallel to facing
(E) have elected to retire early rather than face - Correct

Answer E
If in option A, had elected is changed to have elected, then we have
(A)' have elected early retirement rather than face -- is there a parallelism error here?
why can't the parallel structures be - many doctors have elected early retirement
rather than face -- in this case have elected and face are both verbs and can't they be parallel?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja ,egmat , mikemcgarry , daagh , sayantanc2k - please help .
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

VP
VP
User avatar
V
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 1286
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: 339 Q170 V169
Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2018, 22:31
Skywalker18 wrote:
Answer E
If in option A, had elected is changed to have elected, then we have
(A)' have elected early retirement rather than face -- is there a parallelism error here?
why can't the parallel structures be - many doctors have elected early retirement
rather than face -- in this case have elected and face are both verbs and can't they be parallel?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja ,egmat , mikemcgarry , daagh , sayantanc2k - please help .
Face is not a (full) verb. It's an infinitive. It's slightly hard to see that because the to in to face has been assumed away, leaving only face.

In other words, in the correct option, it is to retire and (to) face that are parallel.
have elected to retire early rather than face
_________________

Ascore Prep | Bangalore

Re: A recent study has found that within the past few years,   [#permalink] 04 Feb 2018, 22:31

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   [ 169 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A recent study has found that within the past few years,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.