It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 21:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 140

Kudos [?]: 275 [3], given: 2

A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2012, 18:30
3
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:16) correct 45% (01:28) wrong based on 358 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people who commit violent crimes had seen at least one act of violence on television during the preceding week. Many psychologists suggest that exposure to acts of violence, even when they are obviously fictional, can increase a person’s propensity to commit violent acts. If government regulators were to ban all violence on television, therefore, we could expect the incidence of violent crimes to decrease by over 50 percent.

The two portions in boldface in the passage above play which of the following roles?

A. The first portion is an inference related to the conclusion of the argument; the second portion supports the conclusion.

B. The first portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence; the second portion supports that conclusion.

C. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence.

D. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence.

E. The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence; the second portion is an inference related to that conclusion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 275 [3], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 23 [1], given: 6

Re: A recent study showed that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2012, 20:57
1
KUDOS
kingb wrote:
A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people who commit violent crimes had seen at least one act of violence on television during the preceding week. Many psychologists suggest that exposure to acts of violence, even when they are obviously fictional, can increase a person’s propensity to commit violent acts. If government regulators were to ban all violence on television, therefore, we could expect the incidence of violent crimes to decrease by over 50 percent.

The two portions in boldface in the passage above play which of the following roles?

A. The first portion is an inference related to the conclusion of the argument; the second portion supports the conclusion.

B. The first portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence; the second portion supports that conclusion.

C. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence.

D. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence.

E. The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence; the second portion is an inference related to that conclusion.

Premise -
more than 50 percent of people who commit violent crimes had seen at least one act of violence on television during the preceding week
Many psychologists suggest that exposure to acts of violence, even when they are obviously fictional, can increase a person’s propensity to commit violent acts.

Conclusion -
If government regulators were to ban all violence on television, therefore, we could expect the incidence of violent crimes to decrease by over 50 percent.

Clearly, first bold part is premise (support for argument/conclusion).
Second bold part is conclusion.
So we are left with C and D.

Since the conclusion starts with "if" ..... and then goes on to say.... "we could expect"
so we can say that there is doubt that this conclusion might be true.

Hence Option C

+1 C

Kudos [?]: 23 [1], given: 6

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: A recent study showed that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2012, 08:42
I chose D, but I admit that choice C is better because the conclusion of the argument is just the suggestion of psychologist. This suggestion is not accepted officially, and it is still in the hypothesis.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2014, 09:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2605

Kudos [?]: 393 [0], given: 182

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2016, 20:04
kingb wrote:
A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people who commit violent crimes had seen at least one act of violence on television during the preceding week. Many psychologists suggest that exposure to acts of violence, even when they are obviously fictional, can increase a person’s propensity to commit violent acts. If government regulators were to ban all violence on television, therefore, we could expect the incidence of violent crimes to decrease by over 50 percent.

The two portions in boldface in the passage above play which of the following roles?

A. The first portion is an inference related to the conclusion of the argument; the second portion supports the conclusion.

B. The first portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence; the second portion supports that conclusion.

C. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence.

D. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence.

E. The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence; the second portion is an inference related to that conclusion.

first one is evidence, presented to support the argument. thus we can eliminate A, B, and E right away.
second one is the conclusion. the second one is presented in IF-then clause - this conclusion is based on SUGGESTIONS, not facts.
thus, it might be true, but might not. therefore, D can be eliminated, and C is the answer.

Kudos [?]: 393 [0], given: 182

Re: A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people   [#permalink] 06 Jan 2016, 20:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by