It is currently 10 Dec 2017, 21:11

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 490 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Nov 2005, 04:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.
The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?
(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B) Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 490 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 21:42
C !

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 21:44
C !

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 22:25
C is out of scope and unsupported by the passage.

Correct answer should be A. 80% of the drivers seriously injured were not wearing seatbelts. What about all the other minor accidents??

Beware of such statistically misrepresentative CRs.

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 22:27
I think D is more appropriate.

If more than 50% front seat people were not wearing seat belts -- this makes the conclusion stronger.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

03 Nov 2005, 13:11
The argument is the following:

Evidence:of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.

Conclusion: by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident

B, C and E are out of scope. D is not un assumption. Imagine all the drivers and fp were not wearing seat belts, can you draw any conclusion about wearing seat belts?.

OA should be A

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

03 Nov 2005, 13:31
A is good.

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 490 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

Show Tags

03 Nov 2005, 14:17
OA is A. Good job guys.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 490 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

Show Tags

03 Nov 2005, 14:43
Example how A is correct:

Let total people surveyed = 100
total people seriously injured in auto accidents in Dole County = 10

80% of 10 or 8 persons were NOT wearing seat belt
20% of 10 or 2 persons were wearning seat belt

now if A is FALSE:

out of people surveyed(100) less than 20 % were wearing seat belt

let:
90 - do not wear set belts
10 - wear seat belts

if we look at proportion now, it tells different story

8 out of 90 people who do not wear seat belt get seriously injured in auto accidents. close to 9%

2 out of 10 people who wear seat belt get into serious injury. 20%

the argument doesn't hold

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

03 Nov 2005, 14:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.