Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 14:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A recession is not caused by any economic force other than a

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 547
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 2

A recession is not caused by any economic force other than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2009, 18:28
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 5 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A recession is not caused by any economic force
other than a nationwide loss of confidence. If the
economy is perceived as being unstable, banks are
conservative in lending money, investors take fewer
risks, and hence economic growth is slowed.

Which of the following, if true, would most
strengthen the argument above?

A recession is severely affected by the response
of the Federal Reserve’s setting of
interest rates.

A recession can be brought on by the failure of
a major bank that had been loaning money.

Slowed economic growth is not the only result
of a recession.

When investors begin taking greater risks it is
enough to stimulate economic growth.

It is a fallacy to assume that economic growth
is necessary for economic stability.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1409
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 388 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2009, 18:52
A recession is not caused by any economic force
other than a nationwide loss of confidence. If the
economy is perceived as being unstable, banks are
conservative in lending money, investors take fewer
risks, and hence economic growth is slowed.

Which of the following, if true, would most
strengthen the argument above?

A recession is severely affected by the response
of the Federal Reserve’s setting of
interest rates.

Tries to set the confidence and fed's response as same and set it as a trap

A recession can be brought on by the failure of
a major bank that had been loaning money.

So factors other than confidence can cause recession. weakens

Slowed economic growth is not the only result
of a recession.

20 other things, we dont care

When investors begin taking greater risks it is
enough to stimulate economic growth.

We are talking about recession and economic growth is referred here For argument sake, lets equate confidence with risk (can we? ). we can say that investor confidence causes economic growth. How ever, that is not the same as lack of confidence causing recession. Can we say vice versa? IMO, No we can only say that there is no economic growth causes no investor confidence

It is a fallacy to assume that economic growth
is necessary for economic stability.

My choice. Only confidence is needed. So economic growth does not contribute to stability.

Wow! is all I can say.. Tough one my choice E

Source OA & OE?
Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 729
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2009, 23:51
Recently, I have started looking at every CR question from If->Then construction perspective first and this one is perfect if then question

For any if X-> then Y, construction, only thing we can conclude is if NOT Y -> then NOT X. .....(Let me call this rule A.)

Here we are given:
1) nationwide loss of confidence is the only cause of recession.

1) If {economy is NOt stable} -> Then {banks are conservative} -> Then {investors take fewer risks} -> Then { Slow economic growth}

A recession is severely affected by the response
of the Federal Reserve’s setting of
interest rates.
This is a clear strap ; lets not bring in our general knowledge as passage does not talk about Fed.

A recession can be brought on by the failure of
a major bank that had been loaning money.
We don't know whether this will result in nationwide loss of confidence. If it does not, this weakens the conclusion.

Slowed economic growth is not the only result
of a recession.
Slowed economic growth is the "cause" not the "result"

When investors begin taking greater risks it is
enough to stimulate economic growth.

This is correct!. Why ? Because, if {investors take fewer risks} -> Then { Slow economic growth}
Negate this as per Rule A.

It is a fallacy to assume that economic growth
is necessary for economic stability.

As per rule A, we can not conclude this, what we can conclude is opposite of this.

HTH
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 104
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2009, 23:57
B
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2009
Posts: 56
Schools: Anderson FEMBA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 115 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2009, 00:46
Quote:
A recession is not caused by any economic force
other than a nationwide loss of confidence. If the
economy is perceived as being unstable, banks are
conservative in lending money, investors take fewer
risks, and hence economic growth is slowed.

Which of the following, if true, would most
strengthen the argument above?

A recession is severely affected by the response
of the Federal Reserve’s setting of
interest rates.

A recession can be brought on by the failure of
a major bank that had been loaning money.

Slowed economic growth is not the only result
of a recession.

When investors begin taking greater risks it is
enough to stimulate economic growth.

It is a fallacy to assume that economic growth
is necessary for economic stability.

I'm going to go with D.

Here are my thoughts:
Given - Recession is caused from a loss of confidence. If the economy appears to be bad, investors / banks get conservative and therefore the economy slows (recession).

Which option strengthens the opinion?
A - out of scope; no mention of the Fed.
B - while it may be true, a failed bank bringing about a recession does not help the author's argument.
C - out of scope; again, looking for points to help the author's point.
E - out of scope; we don't care about economic stability.

D - tells us that if investors take risks, the economy grows. This mates with the given info. If investors do not take risks, the economy slows. If they take risks, the economy will be stimulated.
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 547
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2009, 14:11
OA D
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2009
Posts: 126
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 87 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2010, 13:05
1
KUDOS
+1 for B
Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 223
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2010, 01:02
Is D the OA?? I think "enough to stimulate economic growth" is too extreme, isn't it?
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 316
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2010, 02:25
+1 for D
Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Posts: 90
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.3
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 118 [2] , given: 9

Re: A recession is not caused by any economic force other than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2012, 03:19
2
KUDOS
A recession is severely affected by the response of the Federal Reserve’s setting of interest rates. --> Weakening the argument

A recession can be brought on by the failure of a major bank that had been loaning money. --> Weakening the argument

Slowed economic growth is not the only result of a recession. --> Neither weakens nor strengthens

When investors begin taking greater risks it is enough to stimulate economic growth. --> strengthens the argument

It is a fallacy to assume that economic growth is necessary for economic stability. --> Neither weakens nor strengthens
_________________

Press +1 Kudos rather than saying thanks

Ill be posting good questions as many as I can...

Towards Success

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 360
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 31

Re: A recession is not caused by any economic force other than a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2012, 03:41
okay D is best here.
E just weakens the argument by reversing the conditional statement.
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Re: A recession is not caused by any economic force other than a   [#permalink] 15 Mar 2012, 03:41
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
15 More airplane accidents are caused by pilot error than any o 15 26 Jul 2016, 15:30
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other 0 30 Apr 2013, 00:05
17 The economic recession of the last year has prompted many 12 08 Jul 2016, 05:52
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other 0 29 Oct 2012, 03:11
25 The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other 68 29 Mar 2017, 21:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by