It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 15:37

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

a researcher studying drug addicts found that,on

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Oct 2006, 02:24
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:43) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 42 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

a researcher studying drug addicts found that,on average,they tend to manipulate other peoplea great deat more than nonaddicts do.the researcher concluded that people who frequently manipulate other people are likely to become addicts.

which of the following,if true,most seriously weakens the author's conclusions??

a. after becoming addicted to drugs,drug addict learn to manipulate other people as aa way of obtaining drugs.
b. when they are imprisoned,drug addicts often use their ability to manipiulate other people to obtain better living conditions.
d. people awho are likely to become addicts exhibit unusual behavior patterns other than frequent manipulation of other people.
e. the addicts that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful in obtaining what they wanted when they manipulated other people.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

Show Tags

13 Oct 2006, 02:33
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Was discussed a few days back.
Ans is A. causal CR. You weaken the argument by reversing cause and effect.

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 279

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

Show Tags

13 Oct 2006, 08:02
Yes - one more for A.
_________________

"Never let the fear of striking out get in your wayâ€

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Oct 2006, 09:56

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Oct 2006, 12:29
Why not 'C'? Can someone explain why this doesn't weaken the argument?

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 374

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Oct 2006, 13:56
Clear A, would discard C on the use of some. A is definitive, C is too ambiguous.

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 363

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 17

Location: India
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)

Show Tags

03 Jul 2016, 08:06
any other reason to move out C apart from some?

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 17

Re: a researcher studying drug addicts found that,on   [#permalink] 03 Jul 2016, 08:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

a researcher studying drug addicts found that,on

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.