It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 10:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A researcher studying drug addicts found that, on average,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2006, 16:11
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

91% (00:38) correct 9% (02:44) wrong based on 53 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A researcher studying drug addicts found that, on average, they tend to manipulate other people a great deal more than nonaddicts do. The researcher concluded that people who frequently manipulate other people are likely to become addicts.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcherâ€™s conclusion?

(A) After becoming addicted to drugs, drug addicts learn to manipulate other people as a way of obtaining drugs.
(B) When they are imprisoned, drug addicts often use their ability to manipulate other people to obtain better living conditions.
(D) People who are likely to become addicts exhibit unusual behavior patterns other than frequent manipulation of other people.
(E) The addicts that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful in obtaining what they wanted when they manipulated other people.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1257

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2006, 16:45
(A) After becoming addicted to drugs, drug addicts learn to manipulate other people as a way of obtaining drugs.

If addicts learn to become manipulative after becoming one, then the researchers assertion that the people who are manipulative become addicts falls apart. The causal relationship is no longer evident.

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2006, 18:04
I agree it is A but the OA is E. Can somebody verify this?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1257

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2006, 18:10
I think I've seen this question before... whats the source? MGMAT?

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2006, 19:11
its from the 1000 cr document I found in the forum.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2006, 01:34
govinam wrote:
its from the 1000 cr document I found in the forum.

The answers in the document are not a 100% right. Sad but true

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2006, 03:08
The OA is (A) .It is a OG question
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Schools: Olin Business School - Washington University

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2006, 06:04
Might be wrong but going to say D here as it directly addresses people before they become addicts. Tough choice between A & D.

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 2130

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2006, 09:50
A, D is out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 748

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2006, 13:18
A for me....simple causation type problem

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 377

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: TX

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2006, 15:52
OA is A
This question is in the 1000 CR doc.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 May 2012, 00:20
1
KUDOS
Why is the answer not D? In the given case, the author concludes that manipulative behavior causes people to become addicts. Thus, A causes B. The CR bible says that if we can show that there are other factors at play that cause B, and A is not the only one, then it undermines or weakens the argument. The choice D tells us that manipulative behavior is the not the sole reason for people becoming addict, i.e. A alone is not responsible for the cause of B. Can't we take such a reasoning to say that D indeed is the correct choice?
Help appreciated.
_________________

__________________________________________________________________________
Challenges are what make life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful
__________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 205 [1], given: 31

Concentration: Operations, Strategy

### Show Tags

01 May 2012, 01:57
1
KUDOS
D is an information that just increases the knowledge; okay the guys can manipulate + do some other behavior also
but this information doesnt weaken to any extent. The argument talks of the case in bold

Hence A
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Kudos [?]: 205 [1], given: 31

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 192

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 02:22
Definitely A.

Option D provides additional information which is useless in this context.

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 22

Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 10:40
1
KUDOS
Yes, the answer is 100% A

This argument is the typical correlation causation problem we see with many CR questions. Researchers have found a high incidence of those who manipulate others within drug addicts. They conclude that it is the manipulation that leads people to become drug addicts.

To weaken the argument, we can:

1) Remove the manipulation and show that people are still drug addicts

2) Give an alternate cause for drug addiction, or

The only answer choice that clearly does any of the above, is A.

Choice D, as many people who posted above me said, does not specifically attack the argument. It is a very weak attempt at weakening the argument...

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 0

GMAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Sep 2011
Posts: 284

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 May 2012, 05:16
Has to (a)

Option A strengthens the possibility of reverse causality

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 01 Jan 2012
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Date: 04-30-2012

### Show Tags

03 May 2012, 08:25
A is the only option which weekens...

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2015, 10:50
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: A researcher studying drug addicts found that, on average,   [#permalink] 28 Oct 2015, 10:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by