Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 20:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A seriously maladaptive trait is unlikely to persist in a

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 82
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 03:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A seriously maladaptive trait is unlikely to persist in a given animal population for long, since there is enough genetic variation in populations that some members will lack the trait. Those lacking the trait will compete more successfully for the available resources. Hence these members of the population survive and reproduce at a higher rate, crowding out those with the maladaptive trait.

The proposition that those lacking a maladaptive trait will compete more successfully for the available resoures figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?

A. It expresses a view that the argument as a whole is designed to discredit.

B. It is the argument's main conclusion.

C. It is a premise of the argument.

D. It presents evidence that the argument attempts to undermine.

E. It is an intermediate conclusion of the argument

For a better learning experience I kindly ask that you post your reasoning for choosing a specific answer - thanks.

Last edited by alfyG on 15 Apr 2007, 05:55, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 05:38
C. It is a premise of the argument.
Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 174
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 07:40
Another C
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 863
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 07:50
E looks good to me as the final and this conclusion seem to be linked with each other and there is an explanation for this given by Since ....
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1457
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 08:28
alfyG wrote:
A seriously maladaptive trait is unlikely to persist in a given animal population for long, since there is enough genetic variation in populations that some members will lack the trait. Those lacking the trait will compete more successfully for the available resources. Hence these members of the population survive and reproduce at a higher rate, crowding out those with the maladaptive trait.

The proposition that those lacking a maladaptive trait will compete more successfully for the available resoures figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?

A. It expresses a view that the argument as a whole is designed to discredit.

B. It is the argument's main conclusion.

C. It is a premise of the argument.

D. It presents evidence that the argument attempts to undermine.

E. It is an intermediate conclusion of the argument

For a better learning experience I kindly ask that you post your reasoning for choosing a specific answer - thanks.

CONCLUSION of the argument - A seriously maladaptive trait is unlikely to persist in a given animal population for long

Why?

Since --->

1) there is enough genetic variation in populations that some members will lack the trait

&

2) Those lacking the trait will compete more successfully for the available resources

Hence(this HENCE signals an intermediate conclusion) - these members will survive and reproduce at a higher rate CROWDING out those with maladaptive traits ----> which supports or brings us to the final conclusion of the argument.

Hence C is right. It is a premise of the argument NOT an intermediate conclusion.[/i][/b]
Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 82
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 08:32
OA is C
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 863
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 09:24
C it is...I thought the question was asking about the first line...even though I took the first line as the intermediate conclusion.

Good explanation saurabh...
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 197
Location: California
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2007, 14:56
dwivedys wrote:
alfyG wrote:
A seriously maladaptive trait is unlikely to persist in a given animal population for long, since there is enough genetic variation in populations that some members will lack the trait. Those lacking the trait will compete more successfully for the available resources. Hence these members of the population survive and reproduce at a higher rate, crowding out those with the maladaptive trait.

The proposition that those lacking a maladaptive trait will compete more successfully for the available resoures figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?

A. It expresses a view that the argument as a whole is designed to discredit.

B. It is the argument's main conclusion.

C. It is a premise of the argument.

D. It presents evidence that the argument attempts to undermine.

E. It is an intermediate conclusion of the argument

For a better learning experience I kindly ask that you post your reasoning for choosing a specific answer - thanks.

CONCLUSION of the argument - A seriously maladaptive trait is unlikely to persist in a given animal population for long

Why?

Since --->

1) there is enough genetic variation in populations that some members will lack the trait

&

2) Those lacking the trait will compete more successfully for the available resources

Hence(this HENCE signals an intermediate conclusion) - these members will survive and reproduce at a higher rate CROWDING out those with maladaptive traits ----> which supports or brings us to the final conclusion of the argument.

Hence C is right. It is a premise of the argument NOT an intermediate conclusion.[/i][/b]

Nice explanation. Thanks!
Re: CR - A seriously maladaptive trait   [#permalink] 15 Apr 2007, 14:56
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Unlike other primroses, self-pollinating primroses do not 3 07 May 2011, 08:09
1 The Kuwaiti oil-well fires, unlike the nuclear accident at 9 22 Sep 2009, 08:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by