It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 18:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 255 [0], given: 4

A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2009, 08:15
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:29) correct 32% (01:56) wrong based on 338 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of government aid that United States farmers receive as a group. The government pays farmers the amount, if any, by which the market price at which crops are actually sold falls short of a preset target price per bushel for the crops. The drought of 1983, for example, caused farm-program payments to drop by $10 billion.

Given the information above, which of the following, if true, best explains why the drought of 1983 resulted in a reduction in farm-program payments?

(A) Prior to the drought of 1983, the government raised the target price for crops in order to aid farmers in reducing their debt loads.
(B) Due to the drought of 1983, United States farmers exported less food in 1983 than in the preceding year.
(C) Due to the drought of 1983, United States farmers had smaller harvests and thus received a higher market price for the 1983 crop than for the larger crop of the preceding year.
(D) Due to the drought of 1983, United States farmers planned to plant smaller crops in 1984 than they had in 1983.
(E) Despite the drought of 1983, retail prices for food did not increase significantly between 1982 and 1983.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 255 [0], given: 4

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Schools: Columbia(RD-ding w/o int),
Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2009, 09:07
I go with C

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2009, 11:08
C should be the answer.

We need to resolve the contradiction that a severe drought can actually lower the government's payout to farmers. The question also states that the subsidy the gov't pays is dependent on the price difference btw a target price and actual price per bushel. Answer C states that during the drought actual prices went up. Therefore, closing the gap btw targe price and actual price, and lowering gov't payout.

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 925

Kudos [?]: 1549 [0], given: 40

WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2010, 01:24
If the mk prices were higher then the diff b/w target prices and mkt prices will be more and more the diff, the higher would be the amount govt paid to the farmers.

I am still not clear with C. Can anyone explain this?

11MBA wrote:
C should be the answer.

We need to resolve the contradiction that a severe drought can actually lower the government's payout to farmers. The question also states that the subsidy the gov't pays is dependent on the price difference btw a target price and actual price per bushel. Answer C states that during the drought actual prices went up. Therefore, closing the gap btw targe price and actual price, and lowering gov't payout.

_________________

Want to improve your CR: http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Kudos [?]: 1549 [0], given: 40

4 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 789 [4], given: 6

Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2010, 09:04
4
This post received
KUDOS
should be C.

goverment pays the difference between the preset target price and the market price per bushel to the farmers as part of the farm-program payment.

payment = target price - market price

so higher the difference higher the payment and lower the difference lower the payment.

premise says that farmers were paid low in the drought year.

so obviously the difference between the preset target price and the market price was lower

this differnce (target price - market price) will belower only if the target price is low or the market price is higher.

option C says that ==> Due to the drought of 1983, United States farmers had smaller harvests and thus received a higher market price for the 1983 crop than for the larger crop of the preceding year.

Kudos [?]: 789 [4], given: 6

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Applying This Year !
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V38
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2014, 09:02
This Question is confusing.

The term "farm-program payments" mentioned in the question refers to both "payment to group" and "payment to farmer" .

Government pays either to group or to farmer.

Now the logic is simple.

Small harvest resulted in high market prices. High market prices decreased the difference between market price and preset target price. So, Government paid less.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2015, 02:12
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2016, 17:35
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 267

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 103

Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2017, 02:06
Motown89 wrote:
This Question is confusing.

The term "farm-program payments" mentioned in the question refers to both "payment to group" and "payment to farmer" .

Government pays either to group or to farmer.

Now the logic is simple.

Small harvest resulted in high market prices. High market prices decreased the difference between market price and preset target price. So, Government paid less.

The group that is getting the payment is that of the farmers. Hence, "payment to group" and "payment to farmers" essentially mean the same thing.
_________________

I'd appreciate learning about the grammatical errors in my posts

Please hit Kudos If my Solution helps

My Debrief for 750 - https://gmatclub.com/forum/from-720-to-750-one-of-the-most-difficult-pleatues-to-overcome-246420.html

My CR notes - https://gmatclub.com/forum/patterns-in-cr-questions-243450.html

Rest of the Notes coming soon.

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 103

Re: A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of   [#permalink] 10 Jun 2017, 02:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A severe drought can actually lessen the total amount of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.