It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 14:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 59

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 35

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2013, 00:11
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:18) correct 45% (01:20) wrong based on 412 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down
A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C
Source: Aristotle Prep SC Grail #26

I just wanted to clarify, in the correct option does not "saying that" have to be preceded by a comma? Otherwise we have "innovation saying" or it is correct as is? If it is correct, then please explain.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

There are times when I do not mind kudos...I do enjoy giving some for help

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 35

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 159

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 29

WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2013, 00:01
Agree that C is correct but without commait seems its not the captain but the innovation saying. I believe a comma is needed before Saying to modify the clause.

Please confirm!

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 29

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2014
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 5 [1], given: 4

GPA: 4
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2014, 10:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
obs23 wrote:
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down
A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C
Source: Aristotle Prep SC Grail #26

I just wanted to clarify, in the correct option does not "saying that" have to be preceded by a comma? Otherwise we have "innovation saying" or it is correct as is? If it is correct, then please explain.

we need an expert to reply .. pls


And kudos pls if others have same doubt ... i need to unlock the club tests

Kudos [?]: 5 [1], given: 4

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 49

Concentration: Strategy, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2014, 23:02
I feel A) is a better choice than C). Here are the reasons :

1. C) doesn't seem to be correct because the "and" is a parallel marker should express two independent ideas, while "did a volte-face" and "backed" are not independent ideas. Also, "saying" should be preceded by a comma, as rightly pointed out by obs23 and sarang31, to express the relation between the 2 ideas.

2. A) seems correct because "by backing ... and saying.. " refers to how the "the football team captain did a volte face".


Thanks

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 49

1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 888

Kudos [?]: 722 [1], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2014, 00:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
obs23 wrote:
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down
A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

I just wanted to clarify, in the correct option does not "saying that" have to be preceded by a comma? Otherwise we have "innovation saying" or it is correct as is? If it is correct, then please explain.


Initially, I also have confusion as you in the lack of comma before "saying that". However, if put comma before "saying that", the sentence will be ambiguous because "saying that..." will modifies preceded subject and clause before comma, including both two action "did a volte-face ..." and "backed...", while in the intent meaning, "saying that..." only modifies action "backed..."

Below is my process of elimination:

(A) backing paralleled with saying => not intent meaning
(B) wrong modifier the controversial innovation
(C) no error
(D) past tense go with present continue tense is strange to me
(E) not intent meaning "has now decided to back... when said that..."
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 722 [1], given: 44

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 51

Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2014, 10:46
Phoenix72 wrote:
Agree that C is correct but without commait seems its not the captain but the innovation saying. I believe a comma is needed before Saying to modify the clause.

Please confirm!

I feel the same , saying should be followed by a comma to make sense.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 51

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 9 [1], given: 117

Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.84
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2014, 10:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hi all,

can you plz explane why D is wrong?

thanks :)

Kudos [?]: 9 [1], given: 117

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 7 [2], given: 51

Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2014, 12:33
2
This post received
KUDOS
krikatkat wrote:
Hi all,

can you plz explane why D is wrong?

thanks :)

@krikatkat
Hi,
The question stem looks as follows:

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down
A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying >> should be followed by "that"
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that >>> The controversial innovation is not " A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS)"
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that >>> Correct
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that >>> Multiple errors : Error1 -> Verb tenses are not parallel in the series, showing a sequence and there by changing the original meaning of the sentence. Error2: The original sentence reads "the football team captain did a volte-face " , where as option D reads "the football team captain had a volte-face " both have different meaning. The change in meaning is unwarranted because the meaning of the original sentence is unambiguous.
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that >>>> Change in tense in parallel verbs is changing the meaning of sentence.


Kudos if my post helped

Kudos [?]: 7 [2], given: 51

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 85

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 6

Concentration: Technology, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2016, 07:52
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down.

A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying

the ||'sm shown here backing and saying is not correct and changes the meaning of sentence

B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that - Wrong modifier

C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that

Plain and simple . and correct too

D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that

had and is backing - clearly not ||

E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

has now decided and when he said - not required
_________________

KINDLY KUDOS IF YOU LIKE THE POST

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 906

Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: 314 Q167 V147
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2017, 21:44
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I also couldn't decide between A and C.Anyway both seem weird.
Moreover,this question is considered flawed from one of the Manhattan's proponents.

Refer to : https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... 16749.html

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 906

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 17 Apr 2016
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 254

Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2017, 04:41
idontknowwhy94 wrote:
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down.

A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying

the ||'sm shown here backing and saying is not correct and changes the meaning of sentence

B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that - Wrong modifier

C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that

Plain and simple . and correct too

D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that

had and is backing - clearly not ||

E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

has now decided and when he said - not required



Can you please explain why parallelism between saying and backing is wrong in Option A?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 254

Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4290

Kudos [?]: 7934 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2017, 06:45
Top Contributor
For a discussion, I am unable to appreciate Aristotle's logic implied in their OA.

Between A and C: The Captain, as far as I see, did only one thing namely a somersault; and how did he do that? by retracting from an earlier stand and saying something different now. So backing out and saying are modifiers of the volte-face act, and they do not merit a verb. But C implies that he did two things -- 1. did a volte face and 2. said some blah, blah. This interpretation is logically wrong. IMO, C is out.

In GMAT, Semantics is not secondary to Syntax
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7934 [0], given: 364

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2017, 14:56
I am also struggling to understand choosing between C vs A. I understand that A has parallelism, which is incorrect. However, in C, shouldn't "backed ..." be a subordinate clause to the "did a volte face... " statement? They are not independent - he did a volte face by backing ......

Thoughts?

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2017, 14:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.