GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Jul 2018, 12:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2015
Posts: 21
Location: China
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V37
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2015, 20:13
OA is B. Before we look into the options, we need to know that:
(1) It is the increase of temperatures that cause some terrible results, not the temperatures themselves.
(2) The study revealed an issue, not a subject.

Let's look at these lovely :cry: options:
A. that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing
Wrong.
(1) The study revealed an issue (a clause), correct.
(2) This resulted from the temperatures themselves, wrong.

B. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
Correct.
(1) The study revealed an issue (a clause), correct.
(2) This resulted from the increase of temperatures, correct.

C. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
Wrong.
(1) The study revealed an issue (a clause), correct.
(2) This resulted from the temperatures themselves, wrong.

D. creatures {of the seabed that were suffering from [food supplies (that were dwindling)]}, possibly resulting from an increase in
Wrong.
(1) The study revealed a noun, wrong.
(2) This resulted from the increase of temperatures, correct.

E. creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
Wrong.
(1) The study revealed a noun, wrong.
(2) This resulted from the temperatures themselves, wrong.
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1321
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2017, 19:12
joemama142000 wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing


(A) "possibly resulting from increasing" is ambiguous. When you end a sentence with a participial phrase (resulting from .....), the participle can actually modify anything in the sentence, even things that are merely implied. So it can lead to ambiguity if it could logically modify more than one thing, such as creatures OR food supplies. But (B) has none of that ambiguity.

(C) has clumsy meaning: "suffering because of food supplies". The creatures weren't suffering from food supplies, but from DWINDLING food supplies.

@GMATNINJA, Could you help to explain the answer choice? I am stuck between (A), (B) and (C).
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3199
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2017, 07:25
1
2
ziyuen wrote:
joemama142000 wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing


(A) "possibly resulting from increasing" is ambiguous. When you end a sentence with a participial phrase (resulting from .....), the participle can actually modify anything in the sentence, even things that are merely implied. So it can lead to ambiguity if it could logically modify more than one thing, such as creatures OR food supplies. But (B) has none of that ambiguity.

(C) has clumsy meaning: "suffering because of food supplies". The creatures weren't suffering from food supplies, but from DWINDLING food supplies.

GMATNinja, Could you help to explain the answer choice? I am stuck between (A), (B) and (C).


A: Wrong. Comma + present participle is technically a verb modifier referring to the main verb of the previous clause. In option A the present participle modifier "possibly resulting from increasing.." should refer to "dwindling". However this modifier wrongly refers to "were suffering". This option wrongly implies that the suffering resulted from increasing temrature, but the intended meaning is that the suffering was due to dwindling food supply, not increasing temparatiure.

C: Wrong. This option wrongly implies that the suffering was due to food supplies. Keeping the word "dwindling" within a subsequent non-essential modifier does not make it clear that the suffering was caused by the "dwindling" itself, not by the "food suppplies".

B: The prepositional phrase modifier ("possibly as a result....") correctly refers to the verb of the previous clause "were dwindling". (Note: Comma + prepositional Phrase modifier can also act as a verb modifier referrong to the verb of the previous clause)
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Posts: 173
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 May 2017, 22:17
Quote:

A: Wrong. Comma + present participle is technically a verb modifier referring to the main verb of the previous clause. In option A the present participle modifier "possibly resulting from increasing.." should refer to "dwindling". However this modifier wrongly refers to "were suffering". This option wrongly implies that the suffering resulted from increasing temrature, but the intended meaning is that the suffering was due to dwindling food supply, not increasing temparatiure.


sayantanc2k Thanks for the explanation. Very helpful.

I realized that in Exam Pack 1, I have a different version of this question as below:

A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

Question on A (the above): The modifier in A is COMMA + 'possibly a result from increasing.. " Per my understanding, this is a NOUN (a result) + Noun Modifier (increasing.. ). Noun + Noun Modifier can modify any part of the sentence. In this case it is modifying dwindling food supplies. So why is it incorrect?

Thanks.
_________________

Please take a moment to hit Kudos if my post helps.


Originally posted by sdlife on 24 May 2017, 19:46.
Last edited by sdlife on 24 May 2017, 22:17, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 79
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.01
Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2017, 20:36
why the correct answer can't be C?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 346
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2017, 21:22
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
--> wordy.

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
--> lack of "that"

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
--> lack of "that"
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Posts: 173
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2017, 22:07
sriamlan wrote:
why the correct answer can't be C?


sriamlan,

sayantanc2k has explained it very well, why C can't be the right answer.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-study-of-f ... l#p1849882

Do you still have any specific doubts on C?
_________________

Please take a moment to hit Kudos if my post helps.

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 06 May 2015
Posts: 60
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2017, 23:41
laxieqv wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in


(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

Correct Answer C

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing



Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Expert Post
Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4442
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2017, 08:43
Top Contributor
My first comment is about 'from increasing sea surface temps". This meaning is muddled in this expression. Increasing denotes a phenomenon that keeps on going up and ends at the highest at the end of the notified period. Such an infinite activity cannot exist in practice. If we want to say the temps actually increased overall, then the correct expression would be ' increased temps or 'an increase in temps'. Therefore, I will unhesitantly remove A, C and E. D distorts the meaning as though the study revealed the images of pictures of the creatures. B, on the other hand, uses the idiomatic 'that' after the main clause to report the findings of a study and hence is the best answer.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jun 2016
Posts: 524
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.65
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2017, 09:16
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing
"resulting from increasing" is unidiomatic

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
Correctly rewords the last part the sentence and hence Correct Option

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
"food supplies were dwindling" is what is being conveyed by because of the use of "which ..."

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
Change in meaning : now the sentence does not clearly specifies what did the study revealed ?

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
Again same meaning issue as in D
_________________

Compilation of Blogs by Mike Mcgarry - Magoosh

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 12 Nov 2017
Posts: 109
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2017, 11:18
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

A. that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing
B. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
C. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
D. creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
E. creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4667
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2017, 18:17
ImAnkitKaushik wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

A. that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing
B. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
C. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
D. creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
E. creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

Dear ImAnkitKaushik,

With all due respect, my friend, you committed a GMAT Club faux pas here. This SC question already has been posted a few times in the forum. Please do NOT start a brand new thread for a practice question that has already been posted. Instead, ALWAYS begin with a thorough search, and post your question in a new thread only if you are absolutely convinced that it appears nowhere else in GC. I merged your post into a pre-existing thread. If you have any question about this SC question, please search the responses on this thread: you may find that you question has already been answered, perhaps a few years before it occurred to you to ask it. The pre-existent thread for any question is the appropriate place for all discussion about that question.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 12 Nov 2017
Posts: 109
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2017, 22:44
mikemcgarry wrote:
ImAnkitKaushik wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

A. that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing
B. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
C. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
D. creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
E. creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

Dear ImAnkitKaushik,

With all due respect, my friend, you committed a GMAT Club faux pas here. This SC question already has been posted a few times in the forum. Please do NOT start a brand new thread for a practice question that has already been posted. Instead, ALWAYS begin with a thorough search, and post your question in a new thread only if you are absolutely convinced that it appears nowhere else in GC. I merged your post into a pre-existing thread. If you have any question about this SC question, please search the responses on this thread: you may find that you question has already been answered, perhaps a few years before it occurred to you to ask it. The pre-existent thread for any question is the appropriate place for all discussion about that question.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Hey mikemcgarry,

I usually search in the forum, but for this question I did not find any post.
So, I created a new one.

Thanks,
Ankit Kaushik
SVP
SVP
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1718
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2017, 03:39
mikemcgarry wrote:
Dhairya275 wrote:
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1986 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

A. that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing
B. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
C. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
D. creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
E. creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

I'm happy to help with this. :-)

Split #1: the verb "revealed" requires a "that" clause. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom ... t-clauses/
In colloquial speech, we might drop the word "that", but we cannot do that in the formal language of GMAT SC. Choice (D) & (E) are out.

Split #2: the word "because" is a subordinate clause that must be followed by a full [NOUN] + [VERB] clause. In (C), the word "because" is followed by a noun, "food supplies", but no verb. This commits the missing verb mistake, and is wrong.

Now we are down to (A) & (B). Choice (A) makes a modifier mistake ---- the participle "resulting" should modify the noun it touches, but the "food supplies" were not "resulting from an increasing sea surface temperature". Also, that phrase "an increasing sea surface temperature" is very awkward. It's much clearer to say "an increase in sea surface temperature", which is precisely what (B) has.

Choice (B) is the only answer that is absolutely free of grammatical error. It may not be rhetorically ideal, but it is clearly the best of the five answer choices here.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Dear mikemcgarry

I hope oyu are well and enjoyed the Thanksgiving :-)

I would like to draw your attention that choice C has 'because of' in original question not 'because'. It seems the question was copied incorrectly. So choice C is discarded due to other reasons such meaning not missing verb of subordinate.

Thanks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 144
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q48 V20
WE: Other (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2017, 10:26
Hi?

Please correct my reasoning abt A.

Is it wrong because a verbing should be able to make sense with the subject of the clause i.e Creature of seabed.
And according to it the creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, and this possibly resulting from increasing sea temp.
so it would be wrong as it doesn't make sense.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When nothing seem to help, I would go and look at a Stonecutter hammering away at his rock perhaps a hundred time without as much as a crack showing in it.
Yet at the hundred and first blow it would split in two.
And I knew it was not that blow that did it, But all that had gone Before
.

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 144
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2017, 19:50
1
Prashant10692 wrote:
Hi?

Please correct my reasoning abt A.

Is it wrong because a verbing should be able to make sense with the subject of the clause i.e Creature of seabed.
And according to it the creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, and this possibly resulting from increasing sea temp.
so it would be wrong as it doesn't make sense.


Hi Prashant10692!

I'm happy to jump in for Mike :-) Yes, that's definitely a way that we could think about this! That is correct :-) If we are referring to the entire clause (rather than only the subject of the clause), then we want to use something like "a fact which resulted from", or "as a result of", which choice B correctly uses.

-Carolyn
_________________

Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Sep 2017
Posts: 12
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2018, 00:09
study is the subject so use of that is correct, therefore eliminating d & e. also the use of increasing is wrong here since we are talking about a study that dates back in 19s therefore increase is correct. hence option (b) :-)

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

kudos is a motivation !!!! :cool:
Re: A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989   [#permalink] 24 Feb 2018, 00:09

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 58 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.