It is currently 26 Sep 2017, 07:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 166

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 0

A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2005, 06:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:05) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 15 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes. More than twenty percent of these dog owners, the study also showed, participate in dog show. Thus it is obvious that people who train ther dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

The conclusion above is correct provided that which of the following statements is also true?

(A) It is impossible for a dog to complete in a dog show if the dog has not completed at least one formal obedience training class.
(B) The proportion of dog owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes is representative of the proportion who train their dogs outside such classes.
(C) Dog owners who participate in dog shows only train ther dogs by enrolling them in formal obedience training lessons.
(D) Participation in dog shows is a reliable indicator of how much attention a dog owner pays to his dog.
(E) Only purebred dogs can participate in dog shows, so many owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes are excluded from ths activity.

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2005, 06:37
Hmm, I think I'll pick A.

(B) The proportion of dog owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes is representative of the proportion who train their dogs outside such classes.
- There is no mention about training dogs outside of classes.

(C) Dog owners who participate in dog shows only train ther dogs by enrolling them in formal obedience training lessons.
- If owners enroll their dogs in obediance schools, then they may also enroll them in dog shows. Not the other way around.

(D) Participation in dog shows is a reliable indicator of how much attention a dog owner pays to his dog.
- How much attention the owner pays to his dog is irrelevant to the conclusion.

(E) Only purebred dogs can participate in dog shows, so many owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes are excluded from ths activity.
- This is irrelevant to the argument because there is no mentioning of purebred dogs.
_________________

Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the number of moments that take your breath away.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2005, 07:04
looks like A

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 361

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2005, 07:59
I would pick B

The conclusion is:
people who train their dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

A looks good but seem little too extreme for me.
This means that's it's only the 20 percent of the 10 percent of the dog
owners dogs who can participate in dog show.

B looks better to me.
If we know that dogs get trained not only in the formal training session but also get trained somehwere place else, that implies that there're in fact more dogs who are trained than only the 10 percent of dogs who goes in those formal training classes. I guess this strengthen the conclusion.

C. this would weaken the conclusion

D not relevant

E not relevant

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 840

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2005, 10:04
macca wrote:
I would pick B

The conclusion is:
people who train their dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.
B looks better to me.
If we know that dogs get trained not only in the formal training session but also get trained somehwere place else, that implies that there're in fact more dogs who are trained than only the 10 percent of dogs who goes in those formal training classes. I guess this strengthen the conclusion.

Macca, option B talks only about people who train their dogs outside the class , but nothing is said about their participating in dog shows. If anything, it'll serve to detract from the conclusion.
I know my explanation is not very clear. If somebody can do the job better, do step up!

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2005, 20:41
This is a tricky one. Between A and B - My vote for B!

Why not A?
The conclusion says .....more likely than.....

A says that a dog has to have atleast one training class..else it is impossible to attend a show. This contradicts the conclusion. If this is true than, the .... more likely than.......wont be possible.
If A were to be true, then the conclusion should not have said..more likely than...
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 178

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2005, 05:19
hmm....truly a tough one..,.
I see C also as a possible contender.
Can some one prove why C shud not be an answer???

Thanks,
Krishna

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1704

Kudos [?]: 458 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2005, 15:41
I am stuck between A and C... but finally I will choose A
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 458 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2005
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: Las Vegas

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2005, 20:53
C for me

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2005, 21:00
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 404

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Location: Sunnyvale, CA

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2005, 22:27

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 178

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2005, 22:57
Hi,

can you plz give the OA..

Krishna

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2005, 11:24
A for me.

we need to prove the percentage of dog show participants from the group of trained dogs is more than the percentage of dog show participants from the group of untrained dogs. How do I show 20% of the trained dogs is a relatively higher percentage?

Thru A. If it is impossible to particpate in the dog show without the formal training program then there are no dogs outside of the formally trained group that participate in the dog show. That makes the 20% a max.

GA

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 166

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2005, 13:24
The OA is B

macca's reasoning is correct

A is too extreme and B accounts for the other people who train their dogs outside of formal class

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 404

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Location: Sunnyvale, CA

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2005, 01:40
kimmyg wrote:
The OA is B

macca's reasoning is correct

A is too extreme and B accounts for the other people who train their dogs outside of formal class

I have not been to understand OA.

Conclusion : people who train ther dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

20 Sep 2005, 01:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by