A supermarket adverstised that it would stop : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 Feb 2017, 04:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A supermarket adverstised that it would stop

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 163
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 0

A supermarket adverstised that it would stop [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2013, 10:49
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (01:58) correct 29% (01:07) wrong based on 188 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A supermarket advertised that it would stop carrying certain food products that were processed with silicone since silicone has been shown to cause internal bleeding and nerve damage.

Which of the following, if true, woudl render the supermarket's advertisement immaterial?

A) The use of silicone produces in surgery has been calleed a potential health hazard by the FDA

B) Some foods could not be processed without the use of silicone

C) Internal bleeding can be cuased by any number of procesing techniques

D) People woudl rather shop at a store that shows some concern for their health.

E) Ingesting silicone orally has neer been found to cause health problems of any kind.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Special offer! Save $250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2013
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: -19 [1] , given: 0

Re: A supermarket adverstised that it would stop [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2013, 11:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
BeckyRobinsonTPR wrote:
A supermarket advertised that it would stop carrying certain food products that were processed with silicone since silicone has been shown to cause internal bleeding and nerve damage.

Which of the following, if true, woudl render the supermarket's advertisement immaterial?

A) The use of silicone produces in surgery has been calleed a potential health hazard by the FDA irrelevant

B) Some foods could not be processed without the use of silicone irrelevant to advertisement statement

C) Internal bleeding can be cuased by any number of procesing techniques this looks promising, let's see if there's a better answer

D) People woudl rather shop at a store that shows some concern for their health. irrelevent

E) Ingesting silicone orally has neer been found to cause health problems of any kind. e vs c, clearly, e is the stronger choice

Please give me kudos if I have helped you
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 66
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 243

Re: A supermarket adverstised that it would stop [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 12:09
mnazari wrote:
BeckyRobinsonTPR wrote:
A supermarket advertised that it would stop carrying certain food products that were processed with silicone since silicone has been shown to cause internal bleeding and nerve damage.

Which of the following, if true, woudl render the supermarket's advertisement immaterial?

A) The use of silicone produces in surgery has been calleed a potential health hazard by the FDA irrelevant

B) Some foods could not be processed without the use of silicone irrelevant to advertisement statement

C) Internal bleeding can be cuased by any number of procesing techniques this looks promising, let's see if there's a better answer

D) People woudl rather shop at a store that shows some concern for their health. irrelevent

E) Ingesting silicone orally has neer been found to cause health problems of any kind. e vs c, clearly, e is the stronger choice

Please give me kudos if I have helped you

How is 'C' irrelevant ? If certain foods cannot be cooked using silicone, then obviously people would search for new stores which offer such foods. And this will make the supermarket's objective or advertisement immaterial.
'E' will prove that supermarket is wrong in their assumption that silicone in food is harmful.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 344
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 12

Re: A supermarket adverstised that it would stop [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 15:31
Amit0507 wrote:
mnazari wrote:
BeckyRobinsonTPR wrote:
A supermarket advertised that it would stop carrying certain food products that were processed with silicone since silicone has been shown to cause internal bleeding and nerve damage.

Which of the following, if true, woudl render the supermarket's advertisement immaterial?

A) The use of silicone produces in surgery has been calleed a potential health hazard by the FDA irrelevant

B) Some foods could not be processed without the use of silicone irrelevant to advertisement statement

C) Internal bleeding can be cuased by any number of procesing techniques this looks promising, let's see if there's a better answer

D) People woudl rather shop at a store that shows some concern for their health. irrelevent

E) Ingesting silicone orally has neer been found to cause health problems of any kind. e vs c, clearly, e is the stronger choice

Please give me kudos if I have helped you

How is 'C' irrelevant ? If certain foods cannot be cooked using silicone, then obviously people would search for new stores which offer such foods. And this will make the supermarket's objective or advertisement immaterial.
'E' will prove that supermarket is wrong in their assumption that silicone in food is harmful.

We are not concerned with the processing techniques. What if certain techniques are better than the other. This doesn't render the argument ineffective. Supermarket argument is making a judgement call without proper research. It is trying to make it a causal argument. Silicone -> ill health without any grounds.
Re: A supermarket adverstised that it would stop   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2013, 15:31
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
It would cost Hamilton Inc. two million dollars to stop the 12 23 Feb 2009, 12:43
Dons, a chain of supermarkets, has entered into an agreement 5 08 Jul 2008, 12:53
Don s, a chain of supermarkets, has entered into an 4 29 Jan 2008, 05:31
CR1000: Red Label Supermarkets 7 02 Sep 2007, 14:25
Don s, a chain of supermarkets, has entered into an 2 24 Jun 2007, 14:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A supermarket adverstised that it would stop

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.