GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Jun 2019, 00:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A survey conducted on the marketing departments of some of Europe's to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1211
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: A survey conducted on the marketing departments of some of Europe's to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2017, 12:41
sayantanc2k wrote:
rever08 wrote:
There's been a lot of chaos to this question's answer explanation. Could you please explain D over E?

In my opinion both D and E are wrong. One standrad practice in GMAT is NOT to use the same pronoun in a sentence to refer to two different antecedents:
In
"....companies with a brand-orientated approach achieved twice as much return on their equity..."
and
"...as those that placed their focus elsewhere..."
the pronoun "their" refers to two diferent sets of companies.

Moreover, in
".....with little relation to whether their marketing was creative ...."
the pronoun "their" is ambiguous.

This question appears to be faulty.

Hi,

can you please elaborate on "two times" vs "twice". Is it safe to say that "two times" will always be used with a comparative degree. For example: 2 times LARGER than .....2 times stronger than .... will it always be followed by a "than"?

Regards
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 268
Re: A survey conducted on the marketing departments of some of Europe's to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2019, 01:33
reto wrote:
reto wrote:
A survey conducted on the marketing departments of some of Europe's top 500 companies reveals that companies with a brand-orientated approach achieved two times as much return on their equity as those that placed their focus elsewhere, with little relation to whether their marketing was creative.

A. reveals that companies with a brand-orientated approach achieved two times as much return on their equity as those that placed their focus elsewhere, with little relation to whether their marketing was creative

B. reveals that companies with a brand-orientated approach achieved twice as much return on their equity as those that placed their focus elsewhere, with little relation to whether or not their marketing was creative

C. reveals that companies with a brand-orientated approach achieved twice as much return on their equity as those that placed their focus elsewhere, with little relation to if their marketing was creative

D. revealed that companies with a brand-orientated approach achieved twice as much return on their equity, with little relation to whether their marketing was creative, as those that placed their focus elsewhere

E. revealed that companies with a brand-orientated approach achieved twice as much return on their equity as those that placed their focus elsewhere, with little relation to whether their marketing was creative or not

Hi Guys

A, B and C are out because of the wrong tense (present > reveals) and non idiomatic use of "two times" / "wheter or not".

The official answer is D. E looks promising but it is non-idiomatic: Although this answer choice corrects the original Redundancy error by replacing two times with twice, it is stylistically flawed. Using or not after whether is redundant.

Answer D: This answer choice corrects the original Redundancy error by replacing two times with twice. It also correctly uses whether (and not if) since there is no condition present.

Harley1980 Concerning the change in meaning, I must admit, it is distracting. But meaning is the last thing which one should consider. If one sentence is stylistically flawed or non-idiomatic, we have to POE it. Do you agree?

Thanks

Hey reto gmatexam439
Can you please breif how two times is unidiomatic with respect in choice A
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1479
Re: A survey conducted on the marketing departments of some of Europe's to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2019, 01:04
It's true that the GMAT doesn't like to switch the antecedent for pronouns, but it's worth noting a few things:

*This is not a real grammar rule, and in fact could not sensibly be applied in real writing. We teach this, but I wouldn't make it into a general grammar rule.
*The meaning is very clear, so the GMAT might be willing to relax the "rule" here.
*This usage is in all the choices, so if this appeared on the GMAT we'd just ignore the "error" and look elsewhere.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2018
Posts: 5
Re: A survey conducted on the marketing departments of some of Europe's to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Feb 2019, 19:56
Hi, can someone share what is wrong with A?
Re: A survey conducted on the marketing departments of some of Europe's to   [#permalink] 13 Feb 2019, 19:56

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by