It is currently 24 Jun 2017, 07:24

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A Survey of 100 people revealed that 72 of them had eaten at

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 322
Location: dallas , tx
A Survey of 100 people revealed that 72 of them had eaten at [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 16:17
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

A Survey of 100 people revealed that 72 of them had eaten at restaurant P and that 52 of them had eaten at restaurant Q .Which of the following could not be the number of persons in the surveryed group who had eaten at both P and Q?

a) 20
b)24
c)30
d)50
e)52
_________________

shubhangi

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 461
Location: In the middle of nowhere

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 16:25
Is the question right..
Which of the following could not be the number of persons in the surveryed group who had eaten at both P and Q?

If its could be...then its 24.If its could not be ....then Im lost

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 16:42
Good Question !

Is it A) 20
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 16:46

Total = P+Q+neither-Both
Both = P+Q+Neither-Total
72+52+Neither-100 = 24+neither.
Even if Neither=0 Both will be 24. SO minimum no of people eating at botht the restaurants is 24.
A is the choice because A <24
Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 16:48
anandnk wrote:

Total = P+Q+neither-Both
Both = P+Q+Neither-Total
72+52+Neither-100 = 24+neither.
Even if Neither=0 Both will be 24. SO minimum no of people eating at botht the restaurants is 24.
A is the choice because A <24

I need to learn to reason like you!
good explanation!!
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 16:49

how did you choose A then? I am curious.

Thanks,
Anand.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 461
Location: In the middle of nowhere

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 17:13
Whoopsiedaisy..I interpreted the question in the wrong way..my bad.

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 322
Location: dallas , tx

Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 19:04
Yes ,it is A. i could not figure it out at first.. did you guys.??
_________________

shubhangi

GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE

Show Tags

14 Feb 2004, 03:18
anandnk wrote:

how did you choose A then? I am curious.

Thanks,
Anand.

This is a very easy question to solve logically. There are 5 answers ranging from 20 to 52. By the type of question asked, the answer must be at one end of the range or another (think about this). Well, the number CAN clearly be 52 so the answer must be at the other extreme 20.

Another way to think of it is "what is the minimum number that can be both"? and the anwers can be found using a Venn Diagram technique but it will take a little longer.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

14 Feb 2004, 03:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by