A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 Feb 2017, 04:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1286
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 423 [0], given: 0

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 00:07
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion. From these definitions we can infer that...

A) Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.

B) Every valid argument is circular.

C) No circular argument is valid.

D) Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.

E) Some circular arguments are not valid, and some valid arguments are not circular.

A
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 768
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 647 [0], given: 99

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 06:35
i go with D.
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1569
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 12:19
E seems the best.
SVP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1887
Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 580 [0], given: 32

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2008, 14:45
I was thinking E.

If I got this on test day, I'd probably mutter something under my breath, pick E and move on hopefully forgetting I ever got that question so it wouldn't negatively affect the rest of the test.
_________________

------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$. GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings Manager Joined: 14 Oct 2008 Posts: 160 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0 Re: CR:circular argument [#permalink] ### Show Tags 02 Dec 2008, 15:58 hmmm quite a tricky one, whats the QA ? Intern Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 33 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0 Re: CR:circular argument [#permalink] ### Show Tags 03 Dec 2008, 02:24 I think C. What is OA? Manager Joined: 14 Oct 2008 Posts: 160 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0 Re: CR:circular argument [#permalink] ### Show Tags 03 Dec 2008, 06:52 gameCode wrote: hmmm quite a tricky one, whats the QA ? A, B and C are extreme. Out of D and E, D seems more likely to me. VP Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 1286 Followers: 16 Kudos [?]: 423 [0], given: 0 Re: CR:circular argument [#permalink] ### Show Tags 03 Dec 2008, 23:38 OA is A Manager Joined: 14 Oct 2008 Posts: 160 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0 Re: CR:circular argument [#permalink] ### Show Tags 04 Dec 2008, 02:34 oh dear, this is one of those where anything seems right. Any explanation given for QA ? SVP Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Posts: 1569 Followers: 11 Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0 Re: CR:circular argument [#permalink] ### Show Tags 04 Dec 2008, 03:17 I guess, E gets little strict. A seems logical now (after seeing the OA ) SVP Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 1887 Location: Oklahoma City Schools: Hard Knocks Followers: 40 Kudos [?]: 580 [0], given: 32 Re: CR:circular argument [#permalink] ### Show Tags 04 Dec 2008, 08:02 what is the source of this question? _________________ ------------------------------------ J Allen Morris **I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 119
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2008, 13:34
I have the same question: What is the source? It looks more like an LSAT question than a GMAT, but I am not sure that it is structured correctly. I can find a justification for A as the answer, but the justification depends on interpreting the question in a way that might be too "aggressive". Here it is:

The stimulus says that a valid argument is one where the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true. In other words, if the premises are true, so is the conclusion. What is ALSO true about a valid argument is something that the stimulus does not actually SAY: IF the premises are true, the conclusion can be EITHER true or false.

If all the premises of a circular argument are true, then the conclusion cannot be false, because it is one of the premises. So this fits the definition of a valid argument. But if the premises of a circular argument are false, then the conclusion CANNOT be true -- because it is one of the premises.

So the question is: Are we supposed to interpret the stimulus as saying that if the premises of a valid argument are false, then the conclusion must have the POSSIBILITY of being true? If so, then A is the correct answer. But that looks to me like a very big assumption rather than an interpretation.
_________________

Grumpy

Kaplan Canada LSAT/GMAT/GRE teacher and tutor

Manager
Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 77
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2008, 13:50
Valid argument = If all premises are true, the conclusion is true
Circular argument = one of the premises = conclusion
Therefore, in a cirular argument, IF all premises are true, the conclusion will be true (since its a premise), and hence, its a valid argument.
And this is what A says..
Re: CR:circular argument   [#permalink] 07 Dec 2008, 13:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The argument is based on which assumption 0 19 Jun 2016, 02:03
CR- which weakens the argument 5 14 Aug 2015, 07:45
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 4 28 Jul 2010, 22:24
26 A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 37 28 Jun 2008, 23:38
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 4 19 Nov 2007, 16:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by