A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Feb 2017, 18:14

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 311
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 334 [0], given: 1

A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jan 2010, 09:07
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

81% (02:43) correct 19% (02:35) wrong based on 151 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity tours with playing tours led to problems, so she stopped combining the two. She no longer allows bookstore appearances and playing in competition to occur in the same city within the same trip. This week she is traveling to London to play in a major competition, so during her stay in London she will not be making any publicity appearances at any bookstore in London.
Which one of the following most closely parallels the reasoning used in the passage?
(A) Wherever there is an Acme Bugkiller, many wasps are killed. The Z family garden has an Acme Bugkiller, so any wasps remaining in the garden will soon be killed.
(B) The only times that the hospital’s emergency room staff attends to relatively less serious emergencies are times when there is no critical emergency to attend to. On Monday night the emergency room staff attended to a series of fairly minor emergencies, so there must not have been any critical emergencies to take care of at the time.
(C) Tomato plants require hot summers to thrive. Farms in the cool summers of country Y probably do not have thriving tomato plants.
(E) Butter knives are not sharp. Q was not murdered with a sharp blade, so suspect X’s butter knife may have been the murder weapon.

Oa is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
b
If you have any questions
New!
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 644
Location: Cambridge, MA
Followers: 83

Kudos [?]: 279 [7] , given: 2

Show Tags

26 Jan 2010, 19:07
7
KUDOS
Expert's post
What's the source on this question? Parallelism questions like this, though common on the LSAT, are very rare on the GMAT.

That being said, the key is understanding the question type. With parallelism questions, we usually can focus on one part of the argument, and that will eliminate several wrong answers, if not all of them.

This argument builds it conclusion through a chain of minor sub-conclusions; we should focus at the end. In this case, the final step leading to the ultimate conclusion can be paraphrased as "she's playing, so she's not going to a bookstore"; or, more abstractly, "X, therefore not Y."

Let's look at the conclusions:

(A) Using bugkiller, therefore wasps die ---> X, therefore Y. Not parallel
(B) Minor emergencies, therefore no major emergencies ---> X, therefore not Y. Could be.
(C) Probably not growing in cool weather ---> Not X, therefore probably not Y. Not parallel
(D) Studying, therefore jobs ---> X, therefore Y. Not parallel
(E) Not a sharp blade, therefore might be X's knife ---> Not X, therefore possibly Y. Not parallel.

We don't even need to consider the initial premises to eliminate four inconsistent answers, and realize that (B) is correct.
_________________

Eli Meyer
Kaplan Teacher
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course! Kaplan Reviews Retired Moderator Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 1713 Location: Peru Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government) WE 1: Economic research WE 2: Banking WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs Followers: 101 Kudos [?]: 940 [0], given: 109 Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink] Show Tags 22 May 2012, 15:16 Thanks for that explanation Eli! However, how could we be sure that the chosen part to analyze and compare with the other choices is correct? In addition, I think this type of similar reasoning question of the LSAT doesn't look like the similar reasoning questions of the GMAT. So, we should not be worry with this question, right? _________________ "Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can." My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings Manager Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 201 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 53 [1] , given: 22 Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink] Show Tags 22 May 2012, 20:23 1 This post received KUDOS The logic in the arguement is as follows: If X then not Y If Not X then Y Only Option B shows such relation. Thank you so much for such a great question. Manager Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 172 Location: India Concentration: Technology, General Management GMAT Date: 07-23-2012 WE: Programming (Telecommunications) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 4 Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink] Show Tags 23 May 2012, 10:44 Either X or Y situation. Option B states the same. _________________ FOCUS..this is all I need! Ku-Do! Manager Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP) Joined: 30 Jun 2011 Posts: 213 Location: New Delhi, India Followers: 5 Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 12 Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink] Show Tags 13 Jun 2012, 09:42 Thanks Mr. Eli for such a wonderful explanation _________________ Best Vaibhav If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks BSchool Forum Moderator Status: Flying over the cloud! Joined: 16 Aug 2011 Posts: 911 Location: Viet Nam Concentration: International Business, Marketing GMAT Date: 06-06-2014 GPA: 3.07 Followers: 74 Kudos [?]: 620 [0], given: 44 Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink] Show Tags 14 Jun 2012, 00:51 Great explanation from Eli, Can you give us some tricks and tips to reach the answer of this question. _________________ Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question Senior Manager Joined: 15 Sep 2009 Posts: 271 GMAT 1: 750 Q V Followers: 10 Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 6 Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink] Show Tags 19 Jun 2012, 07:32 I used fairly simple logic to get this. Thus: events A and B don't 'mix' therefore if event A occurs then event B does not. Only answer B mimics the style of reasoning. Cheers. Posted from my mobile device _________________ +1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian. Kaplan GMAT Instructor Joined: 25 Aug 2009 Posts: 644 Location: Cambridge, MA Followers: 83 Kudos [?]: 279 [1] , given: 2 Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink] Show Tags 20 Jun 2012, 19:25 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post tuanquang269 wrote: Great explanation from Eli, Can you give us some tricks and tips to reach the answer of this question. I could go into more depht...but I'm not sure how helpful it would be. The basic strategy for this type of problem is to pick one piece (usually the conclusion) of the argument, rule out answer choices that don't match it in structure and logic, then if necessary pick a different part of the argument to kill the rest of the remaining wrong answers. The detailed strategy? Well, if you were studying for the LSAT, I'd go into a lot more depth, but this question type is so rare on the GMAT (I counted *0* on a quick scan of the first 100 OG CR questions) that I would feel guilty for distracting you from common, relevant question types if I spent any more word count! _________________ Eli Meyer Kaplan Teacher http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT Prepare with Kaplan and save$150 on a course!

Kaplan Reviews

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 22

Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jun 2012, 20:30
Relation:
If X then not Y.
If Y then not X.

Only B shows such relation.
Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 220
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 166

Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jul 2012, 02:00
+ 1 B
It was a really great explanation from Eli
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 397
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 13

Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jul 2012, 07:33
Another interesting tip I read in the LSAT book. In parallel reasoning type of questions, you can rule out those statements which do not match the original intent.
So, those answer choices which replace let's say a WILL in the original question with a MAY or a POSSIBLY, can be ruled out. degrees of certainty gotta match.

Using this rule, we can straight away narrow down to A,B and D.
C - uses probably
E - may have been

The usage of negatives is what makes the answers so confusing. You have to be careful not use die as NO WASPS. I used this logic and I chose A.
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 78
Schools: IE '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: -12 [1] , given: 0

Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 21:27
1
KUDOS
If X then not Y
If Not X then Y

I agree with B
Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 9

Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 May 2013, 12:12
KapTeacherEli wrote:

Well, if you were studying for the LSAT, I'd go into a lot more depth, but this question type is so rare on the GMAT (I counted *0* on a quick scan of the first 100 OG CR questions) that I would feel guilty for distracting you from common, relevant question types if I spent any more word count!

Great explanation for the question Eli And thanks for pointing out these type of questions are very rare in GMAT. I see them as a waste of time
Re: A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity   [#permalink] 19 May 2013, 12:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 A well-known sports figure found that combining 0 04 Feb 2017, 09:10
9 Investment Advisor: It is well-known that investing in 22 05 Nov 2009, 22:07
3 A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity 14 30 Jun 2009, 23:49
1 A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity 3 19 Jun 2009, 09:40
A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity 4 25 Aug 2007, 20:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by