It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 12:52

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jun 2005, 00:49
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (00:48) correct 24% (00:31) wrong based on 215 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jun 2005, 01:31
A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
- more numerous is not idiomatic

B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
- B changes the meaning of the sentence.

C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
- 'was' is the wrong tense

D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than

E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than
- more numerous is not idiomatic

D is the best

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 85

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Location: San Francisco
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jun 2005, 02:49
Yes, D is the best answer.

â€œâ€¦predictsâ€¦will failâ€¦â€

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 839

Kudos [?]: 130 [1], given: 0

Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2005, 02:38
1
KUDOS
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.

Kudos [?]: 130 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2005, 05:22
Thanks all. OA is indeed D. B fails in use of would - disagrees with other verbs in tense and mood (OG).

I had a concern in the OA, isn't the sentence in a subjunctie mood? And if so don't we need a were in
if the density ... is greater

Can someone please explain why isn't why isn't a subjunctive mood used here?

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2005, 08:43
I dont thin it is subjuctive mood. It is cause and effect. If that happen(s), this (will) happen. e.g.

I will fail if I do not study.

Subjunctive mood is applied when the author seems to indicate that his statements have very low probability to be true and seems to indicate a wish. e.g.

If I were you, I would study hard.

Hope it helps.

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: Atlanta , GA
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2005, 20:42

in "If " sentences : if the conditional clause is in present tense , the following clause has to be in future tense.

So will should be used.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2005, 14:15
Vithal wrote:
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.

Much/More are used for uncountable nouns. With density being a "countable" noun, you'll need greater than.

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 839

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2005, 14:29
gmataquaguy wrote:
Vithal wrote:
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.

Much/More are used for uncountable nouns. With density being a "countable" noun, you'll need greater than.

I don't think density is countable - countable being "one that can be counted - not one that can be quantified"

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2734

Kudos [?]: 1076 [0], given: 4

Location: New York City
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Aug 2007, 10:58
gmataquaguy wrote:
Vithal wrote:
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.

Much/More are used for uncountable nouns. With density being a "countable" noun, you'll need greater than.

density is NOT countable. 1 density, 2 density, 3 density....

the part that makes E wrong is timber wolf density rather than density of the timber wolf population.

Kudos [?]: 1076 [0], given: 4

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1791

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 May 2008, 14:36
sonaketu wrote:
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than

A- Wrong reasons
(1) "would fail ... if density is "<--Wrong structure it should be "will fail ... if density is "
(2) more numerous --wrong
B - changed the meaning .. looks like some one is providing the density here.
C - "Should fail .. if was " wrong structure should "would fail" .. if was
D -- correct
E) wrong more numerous
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 5

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10146

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 18:33
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4311

Kudos [?]: 8165 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jan 2016, 20:39
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than

This belongs to the first category conditional, where you use a present tense in the 'if' clause and a simple present or a simple future in the ‘then’ clause. We can conveniently ignore A, B and C for using the modal verb ' would ' and 'should'. Between D and E, we can eliminate E for using a countable ‘more numerous’ rather than the ‘greater’ for an obvious mass noun namely ‘density’
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8165 [0], given: 364

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 179

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30
In a press release, a local representative of the US [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2017, 12:30
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 179

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 179

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30
Re: In a press release, a local representative of the US [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2017, 12:34
A prediction is made about a future event, which can be restated using the construction y will
happen if x happens first (an alternate form is if x happens, y will happen). The subjunctive verb form would expresses remoteness and thus casts some doubt on the likelihood of x. The verb form "will fail" expresses the likelihood x with greater certainty. Density is not a countable quantity, so it cannot be modified by more numerous, which is used solely for countable quantities; greater is correct.
A Would fail expresses doubt about the future outcome; density should be modified by greater.

B This construction requires will fail, not would fail; if is preferred to provided; density should be modified by greater.

C Will fail, not should fail, is required; timber wolf density does not clearly refer to the population; the tense of the final verb is incorrect.

D Correct. The verb form will fail better expresses the certainty of the prediction; density is appropriately modified by greater.

E Timber wolf density does not clearly refer to the population; the tense and number of the final verb are incorrect; density cannot be modified by numerous.
The correct answer should be D.

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 179

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 179

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30
Re: In a press release, a local representative of the US [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2017, 12:39
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In a press release, a local representative of the US Postal Service responded to criticism over the removal of street corner postal drop boxes, claiming that if more people are actually using the drop boxes for their mail, they will be better able to “pay their keep.”

A) more people are actually using the drop boxes for their mail, they will
B) the drop boxes were actually used by any more people for their mail, they will
C) the more people who are actually using the drop boxes for their mail will make them
D) the drop boxes are put to better use when more people actually use them for their mail, they will
E) more people actually used the drop boxes for their mail, they would

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 179

Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

Re: In a press release, a local representative of the US [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2017, 20:38
Bounce1987 wrote:
In a press release, a local representative of the US Postal Service responded to criticism over the removal of street corner postal drop boxes, claiming that if more people are actually using the drop boxes for their mail, they will be better able to “pay their keep.”

A) more people are actually using the drop boxes for their mail, they will
B) the drop boxes were actually used by any more people for their mail, they will
C) the more people who are actually using the drop boxes for their mail will make them
D) the drop boxes are put to better use when more people actually use them for their mail, they will
E) more people actually used the drop boxes for their mail, they would

the above sentence has a conditional........which says if......
now the 3 conditional constructions are
if present.......will....present or infinitive
if past......would infinitive
if past perfect.....would have.....past participle

so B is out
and as well...A, B, C & D dont satisfy the requirement of past verb as stated in non underlined part criticism that has happened
C distorts meaning....mail will make them
D construction is wordy and awkward

E is perfectly stating conditionals and past verb

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 21

Re: In a press release, a local representative of the US [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 06:05
Bounce1987 wrote:
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than

Can you confirm the OA, I don't think it is E.
_________________

If the post helps, kudos please.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 21

Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 284

Location: India
Schools: ISB '19 (I)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: In a press release, a local representative of the US [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 06:52
Bounce1987 wrote:
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than

This is a OG 10th edition Q 161, the correct answer is D, not E. Kindly update.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 284

Re: In a press release, a local representative of the US   [#permalink] 14 Aug 2017, 06:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by