It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 22:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 193

Kudos [?]: 134 [4], given: 0

A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2008, 22:36
4
KUDOS
21
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (01:37) correct 53% (01:46) wrong based on 1070 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.

Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?

(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.

Source : Lsat
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 134 [4], given: 0

Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 514

Kudos [?]: 165 [4], given: 0

Schools: Wharton
Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2008, 04:55
4
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
hibloom wrote:
A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.
Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.

I would go B.

(A) The passage says if X then Y. The answer says If Y then X.
(B) CORRECT. If modern architects violate the first sentence, then they must create obtrusive buildings
(C) Goes too far. Passage never said these architects can't. It says they don't.
(D) The passage says if X then Y. The answer says If Y then X.
(E) Here, the architectural work can express an architect's personality as long he/she doesn't let the personality run wild.

Kudos [?]: 165 [4], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 290

Kudos [?]: 57 [2], given: 0

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2008, 17:31
2
KUDOS
B
here is what i think :

lemme concentrate on E and B as they are the fav.

B : it logically follows ; it is not something stated directly but something that one has to deduce.

The argument gives below statements :

work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment
Modern architects have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.

---> Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not (not functional for public use) unobtrusive.

E is quite a strong statement in saying that something "cannot" happen ; the author just says that "architects have let their strong personalities take over their work" it doesn't mean that "work of architecture cannot express its architect’s personality and at the same time be functional for public use."

Kudos [?]: 57 [2], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 429

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2008, 22:51
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
hibloom wrote:
A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.
Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.

IMO E)

A) just repeats statement is passage "if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive"
C) Repeat "They have let their strong personalities take over their work ... "
D) Does not follow the passage correctly
E) Nicely sums up everything.

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1534

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2008, 03:16
I agree with E. Others simply repeat what is stated in the original paragraph.

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 634

Kudos [?]: 646 [0], given: 6

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2008, 05:24
Between E and B, I feel E is an assumption, whereas B states the outcome. IMO B. I have not selected E because if I negate the statement in E, conclusion fails to substantiate.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Kudos [?]: 646 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Location: Hungary
Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2008, 08:29
A. there is no definition about unobtrusive --- incorrect
B. correct
C. there is no information regarding this
D. there is no information regarding this
E. there is no information regarding this

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2008, 08:54
I still feel B is only a rephrase, its not a inference . "They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional..."

Whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 193

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 0

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2008, 11:43
OA is B
but its still not clear to me

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2008, 22:36
stallone wrote:
B
here is what i think :

lemme concentrate on E and B as they are the fav.

B : it logically follows ; it is not something stated directly but something that one has to deduce.

The argument gives below statements :

work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment
Modern architects have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.

---> Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not (not functional for public use) unobtrusive.

E is quite a strong statement in saying that something "cannot" happen ; the author just says that "architects have let their strong personalities take over their work" it doesn't mean that "work of architecture cannot express its architect’s personality and at the same time be functional for public use."

I picked up E too but I agree that between E and B, E is too strong. Thanks stallone.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 67

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2008, 23:21
nmohindru wrote:
hibloom wrote:
A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.
Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.

IMO E)

A) just repeats statement is passage "if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive"
C) Repeat "They have let their strong personalities take over their work ... "
D) Does not follow the passage correctly
E) Nicely sums up everything.

its B

as the premise states strong personalities while E states architect’s personality

it makes a lot of difference

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 15

Location: india
WE 1: 1.3
Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2010, 10:08
answer is b as it is supported by both premises,also e is too extreme as it talks abt all archirects in general while the passage speaks only abt modern architects

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2010, 20:19
this is a inference type question, in above statements no conclusion.
Modern architects….violated this precept meaning Modern architects produced buildings that are not unobstrusive.

(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional. (distinction between work of architect & modern architect)
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.(modern architect with strong personality is discussed)
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use. (functions well for public use meaning is too specific)
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use (1st part is wrong & 2nd part right).

counter arguments most welcome

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 12

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2010, 09:58
B

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2010, 13:44
A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.

(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.

B is the only which support.. this is like a must true / support question

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 252

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 27

Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2010, 08:38
I agree that E is strong. But B is just a repetition of the sentence in different words.
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 27

Intern
Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: india
Schools: Virginia Darden,Duke Fuqua,Michigan Ross
Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2011, 05:19
IMO its D not B.

(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional. -
For arch to be inviting and functional it has to be unobtrusive ..bt just an arch is unobtrusive does nt mean its inviting n....

(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
Last line states architects who let their strong personalities take over produce bldgs that are nt functional.Now if we refer to option A we see that just an archictecture is unobtrusive does nt mean its inviting or functional.IF A is wrong then B is also wrong....Cos it reframes the original stmt wrongly...

(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public

Easily wrong

(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.

Original line clearly states that functional inviting , unobtrusive ..taking second place in env...I think it can be assumed safely that anything that takes the second place is inviting ,functional and unobtrusive......
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.
Here in teh passage it is sed for the architects whose personality takes over their work..It does nt talk abt exressing the personality only....so shud be ignored..

Anyone who is seeing a conflict kindly revert...

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2011, 01:10
It has a double negative, namely not unobtrusive. If you remove the double negative it suggests that
Modern architects make buildings that are obtrusive

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2011, 00:49
good one this...B
_________________

_________________________
Try and you will succeed !

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 232

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 25

Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2011, 03:38
IMO B. B can be clearly logically drawn from given statement
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 25

Re: A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and   [#permalink] 23 Nov 2011, 03:38

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 35 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by