OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
According to Adam Smith, the ideal economic environment for a society is free-market capitalism, a structure where open competition among producers yield the best products for consumers, manufactured and sold at the lowest possible prices.
The underlined portion is an appositive—something that describes or gives more information about the noun
free-market capitalism.
The singular subject open competition requires the singular verb yields.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) a structure where open competition among producers yield the best products for consumers, manufactured and sold at the lowest possible prices.
• subject/verb agreement
→ the singular subject
competition does not agree with the plural verb
yield• The word
where should be used to refer to an actual physical location, not to a market structure.
See "Notes," below: in rare cases, the word where can refer to
community or
society. ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B) a structure in which open competition among producers yield the best products for consumers, and they are manufactured and sold at the lowest possible prices.
• subject/verb agreement
→ the singular subject
competition does not agree with the plural verb
yield• the pronoun
they is awkward but not ambiguous
→ The word
they could theoretically stand for
consumers, products or
producers. Those three are plural nouns.
But the only logical antecedent is
products. Neither producers nor consumers are manufactured or sold.
On the first pass, do not eliminate an option on the basis of pronoun ambiguity.
Look for other errors first.
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) a structure in which open competition among producers yields the best products for consumers—products manufactured and sold at the lowest possible prices.
• I do not see any errors
• subject/verb: the singular verb
yields agrees with the singular subject
open competition.
Quote:
D) a structure in which open competition among producers yields the best products for consumers manufactured and sold at the lowest possible prices.
• modifier error/nonsensical
→
consumers are not manufactured or sold at the lowest possible prices.
→ manufactured and sold are obviously intended to modify
products, the head noun in the noun phrase
products for consumers.
→ Why are these noun modifiers different from which and than? Why can't they "reach back" and modify their noun, products?
I have demonstrated in other OEs that the words
which and
that can "reach back over" other modifiers of a noun, usually prepositional phrases, to modify a noun.
So why can't
manufactured "reach back over"
consumers (the object of the prepositional phrase attached to
products) in order to modify
products?
Answer: because
manufactured is a past participle (a verbED), and on the GMAT, a past participle can modify
only the immediately preceding word, whether or not that past participle is preceded by a comma. [Heads up: you just read an instance in which
whether or not is correct. Rare.]
See Notes, below, for more details about this modifier.
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E) a structure where open competition among producers yields the best products for consumers, but they are manufactured and sold at the lowest possible prices.
• The use of
where to refer to a market structure is unidiomatic.
• Contrast is not needed
→ The use of
but is incorrect because there is no contrast implied in the sentence.
ELIMINATE E
The answer is C.Notes• WHEREOn the GMAT, the word
where can refer to
community or
society (or part of a society, including something such as "bourgeois culture").
Spoiler alert!Official question #1:
here.Official question #2:
here.Be careful: although it is permissible to use
where to refer to something that is not an actual physical location, such usage is not common on the GMAT.
• Past participles (verbED words)On the GMAT, can modify only the immediately preceding noun, whether the participle (verbED) is preceded by a comma or not.
In SWE, the situation is a little different.
Past participles that are not preceded by a comma do indeed modify the immediately preceding word, as is the case in option D.
But past participles that are preceded by a comma are allowed to modify entire clauses. Not so on the GMAT—yet.
I say "yet" because this GMAC guideline differs from the analogous rule in almost every other grammar or style book.
I do not recall ever having seen an exception in an official question, but this area may be "ripe for change."
Takeaway? If the other four answers are horrible and you see [COMMA + PAST PARTICIPLE] modifying an entire previous clause in the fifth answer and it makes sense, pick that answer.
COMMENTSNawalDwivedi , once again, welcome to SC Butler.
These answers range from very good to outstanding.
Lucky are the aspirants who follow.