GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 06 Dec 2019, 03:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

According to government official involved in overseeing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1406
Location: NewJersey USA
According to government official involved in overseeing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2004, 13:14
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (02:10) correct 36% (02:33) wrong based on 81 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

18. According to government official involved in overseeing airplane safety during the last year, over 75 percent of the voice-recorder tapes taken from small airplanes involved in relatively minor accidents record the whistling of the pilot during the fifteen minutes immediately preceding the accident. Even such minor accidents pose some safety risk. Therefore, if passengers hear the pilot start to whistle they should take safety precautions, whether instructed by the pilot to do so or not.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

(A) accepts the reliability of the cited statistics on the authority of an unidentified government official

(B) ignores the fact that in nearly one quarter of these accidents following the recommendation would not have improved passenger' safety

(C) does not indicate the criteria by which an accident is classified as "relatively minor"

(D) provides no information about the percentage of all small airplane flights during which the pilot whistles at some time during that flight

(E) fails to specify the percentage of all small airplane flights that involve relatively minor accidents
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1406
Location: NewJersey USA
Re: According to government official involved in overseeing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2004, 13:26
How do you justify your answer. It is impossible to findout when pilot wistles during the flight unless recording takesplace during the entire flight duration. I dont think it shows the flaw in the argument. The flaw apparent if it can be shown that accidents are caused by someother thing than wistling.
Are you thinking that if we one can show that pilots did wistle during some part of the flight journey and that didnt cause accidents then the flaw in the investigators reasoning becomes apparent?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 179
Location: MI
Re: According to government official involved in overseeing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2004, 13:31
anandnk wrote:
How do you justify your answer. It is impossible to findout when pilot wistles during the flight unless recording takesplace during the entire flight duration. I dont think it shows the flaw in the argument. The flaw apparent if it can be shown that accidents are caused by someother thing than wistling.
Are you thinking that if we one can show that pilots did wistle during some part of the flight journey and that didnt cause accidents then the flaw in the investigators reasoning becomes apparent?


I did not consider the fact - how will one find out the percentage of time the pilots whistle. But, consider this -
If the pilots whistle in almost 100% of time in all the flights, how will the passengers distinguish between a risk and no risk situation ? See what I am trying to say...
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1406
Location: NewJersey USA
Re: According to government official involved in overseeing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2004, 07:26
D is correct.

Unbelievable scenario. What would the passenegers do if pilots whistle on on average 30% of the time, or 60% of the time. It does not matter how often they whistle. Passengers will go for cover. I feel it is a stupid question. It is hard to judge for the passengers when to take cover no matter what the percentage is. So they will take the default action. It would good if the answer were rephrased as "passengers cannot decide when to take the cover whether or not it is kown how often the pilots whistle"
It is way far away from foraml logic question that talks about unbelievable scenario ( like life on mars for example ) and also way far away from reasonable plausible argument.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Re: According to government official involved in overseeing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2016, 05:30
Answer D seems to be logical one.
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 864
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: According to government official involved in overseeing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2019, 08:32
OA added and bumping for further discussion
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: Here
My RC Guide: Here
Need an expert to grade your AWA? Go: Here
Want to know your Business School chances? Go: Here
Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 211
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
According to government official involved in overseeing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2019, 13:07
1
nightblade354 wrote:
OA added and bumping for further discussion



Hi everyone,

We are given that 75% of the planes involved in small crashes involve the captain whistling.
The conclusion is a suggestion: whenever you hear the captain whistling, take safe precautions!

Pre-thinking

Falsification scenario: what if in the majority of flights captains whistle?
Assumption: An insignificant number of captains whistle in flights not involved in small crashes.

If you like numbers:

Let's assume 100 small crashes are reported ------>in 75 of such crashes the captain whistles
Let's assume 1 million flights do not involve any crash. The majority of the captain of such flights whistle.

Such scenario falsifies the conclusion.

Option D is the correct option because it spots the flaw presented above
GMAT Club Bot
According to government official involved in overseeing   [#permalink] 30 Nov 2019, 13:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

According to government official involved in overseeing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne