Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 16 Jul 2019, 13:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 258
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2013, 07:15
Hi,

'makes' is present tense, I would think that it would be better to have it in the future/conditional. I.e. Skimming would make it possible for a new aircraft....

It's not the major issue with the sentence though, and could possibly be argued the other way.

James
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2013, 02:53
uledssul wrote:
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
Everything else seems okay except the colored "its" referring to "a proposed new style". I wasn't sure if "a proposed new style's proponents" makes sense in the context.

B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
Meaning distortion. Having "by ~" in the front implies that "skimming ~" is the reason for the proponents' support.

C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
The colored one sounds like 'skimming ~' is additional information.

D. A proposed new style of aircraft, [color=#0000ff]say its proponents, could[/color] fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
S/V agreement error

E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours
Missing the subject

I chose A as the answer.


------
How can D have subject verb disagreement when "say" is the verb action attached to "proponents" which is plural.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
B
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1391
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2013, 04:26
Salfar wrote:
uledssul wrote:
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
Everything else seems okay except the colored "its" referring to "a proposed new style". I wasn't sure if "a proposed new style's proponents" makes sense in the context.

B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
Meaning distortion. Having "by ~" in the front implies that "skimming ~" is the reason for the proponents' support.

C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
The colored one sounds like 'skimming ~' is additional information.

D. A proposed new style of aircraft, [color=#0000ff]say its proponents, could[/color] fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
S/V agreement error

E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours
Missing the subject

I chose A as the answer.


------
How can D have subject verb disagreement when "say" is the verb action attached to "proponents" which is plural.



I believe that D is wrong because of the unsure antecedent of "its" rather than subject verb agreement
_________________
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 692
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2013, 07:58
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

Remove the modifier "by skimming..... atmosphere" and the sentence makes sense as per below:

According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.Also the "by skimming ...atmosphere" is an adverbial phrase modifying "could"

B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
Proponents are not skimming , it is the aircraft which is skimming.
C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
WITH IT.... with WHAT?........ IT is ambiguous as it can refer to Earth/aircraft.
D. A proposed new style of aircraft, say its proponents, could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
CAUSE = BECAUSE and EFFECT= aircraft could fly..... when it is not required in the original sentence.
E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
makes it possible=wordy
ITS is far from its antecedent.


Rgds,
TGC!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 109
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 26 Aug 2013, 11:53
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
D. A proposed new style of aircraft, say its proponents, could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours

I couldn't choose correct answer because of two doubts.
1> Who is flying ? Aircraft or new style? Sentence says Style.
2> Who is skimming? Proponents or Aircraft? Sentence says Proponents.
3> Is modifier clause 'by skimming along the top of the atmosphere' present at correct place?

Can anyone please help me to analyze the sentence?

Originally posted by umeshpatil on 26 Aug 2013, 09:04.
Last edited by Narenn on 26 Aug 2013, 11:53, edited 1 time in total.
Merged in similar topic. Pls search the forum before posting a new question
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1004
Location: United States
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2013, 11:29
3
1
Hi umesh

For your first question: Who is flying ? Aircraft or new style? Sentence says Style.
This sentence uses a rare structure: (noun + preposition) ==> acts as an adjective.
For example: I have a great deal of experience in introducing new products to international markets.
"deal" is a noun. the noun "deal" itself means nothing if it does not have the modifier to know what you're actually talking about (you're talking about "experience").
"a great deal of" = adjective ==> means a lot.

Back to your question, "a new style OF aircraft" follows the same structure. "a new style" can't fly for sure. If you just stop at "a new style", you mean nothing.
"a new style OF aircraft" conveys different meaning. It talks about an aircraft actually. Thus, an aircraft can fly.

For your second question:Who is skimming? Proponents or Aircraft? Sentence says Proponents.
"by skimming...." is modifier ==> It should modify a preceding noun/noun phrase. Because "a new style of aircraft" is actually about the aircraft, thus the aircraft should skim along the top of the atmosphere.

For your third question: Is modifier clause 'by skimming along the top of the atmosphere' present at correct place?
The modifier "by skimming along...." is placed correctly. It modify a preceding noun/noun phrase - "a new style of aircraft".


ANALYZE ALL OPTIONS:

According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
Correct. As stated above.

B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
Wrong. "by skimming" modifies "proponents" <== wrong meaning.

C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
Wrong. "with it skimming" is wrong. It's neither a possessive structure (should be its) nor a modifier ("it" is placed incorrectly).

D. A proposed new style of aircraft, say its proponents, could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
Wrong. "because of its skimming" is wordier than "by skimming". In addition, the meaning "could fly ...because of its skimming" sounds awkward.

E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours
Wrong. "according to its proponents, skimming...." <== it sounds like the proponents of skimming. Hence, the meaning is not clear.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 744
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2013, 11:54
A proposed new style (of aircraft, say its proponents,) could fly between most points........
Development of a hydrogen car can go for 100 miles without refueling....
I hope it reminds us something which we studied in MGMAT SC Chapter 3....Subject and verb make sense together.
C and D out... straight away.
After 4 shots A survived in the end.
_________________
Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos :)
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Posts: 41
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2014, 19:47
D is wrong because it changed the meaning of the sentence.

"its skimming along the top of the atmosphere"is a modifier,not a cause-effect.

Hence A is correct although it seemed strange.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 19
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2014, 17:57
I'm a bit confused here: The noun 'aircraft' is inside a prepositional phrase, so the main subject is 'style. Then how can a 'style' fly between two points? Can somebody please explain?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Posts: 44
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2015, 15:40
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
correct
B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
First clause modifying proponents which is wrong
C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
Its reference is ambiguous.
D. A proposed new style of aircraft, say its proponents, could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
same as C
E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours
Same as D

Hence A
Ans


Regards
SG
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Dec 2016
Posts: 1
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2016, 00:06
Have gone through the previous posts, still need some help in understanding why option C is incorrect.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2870
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jan 2017, 01:24
ankur2710new wrote:
Have gone through the previous posts, still need some help in understanding why option C is incorrect.


The two main problems with options C are as follows:

1. The preposition "with" is used wrongly to depict how something is done (how an aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours). For answering "how" questions, "by" is an appropriate preposition.

2. The prepositional modifier "with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere." should ideally touch the noun it refers ("style of aircraft") - the modifier wrongly refers to "proponents".
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 98
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2017, 13:31
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

Issue: Modifier | Construction

Analysis:
1. Core of the sentence: "new style of aircraft.. could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours"
2. Modifiers have to be placed in a way that conveys the meaning succinctly.


A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
- "By skimming..." incorrectly modifies "proponents", leading to non-sensical meaning

C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
- "with it" does not have a clear reference and is too far from aircraft that is supposed to modify

D. A proposed new style of aircraft, say its proponents, could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
- "because of its skimming" is ungrammatical

E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
- "According to its proponents" incorrectly modifies "skimming"
- usage of "possible" and "could" is redundant.


Answer: A.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 625
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2017, 14:38
A. According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
B. By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.
C. A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
D. A proposed new style of aircraft, say its proponents, could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.
E. According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.


Option b the phrase by.. is modifying proponents which is wrong, in option D the structure is wrong as it means that the arcraft says that the proponents could fly ...wrong
option C with it skimming along the top... is wrong it should be by skimming along the top,option E skimming along the top of what? it does not clearly says the aircraft and writing that makes it possible for a proposed new... would make more sense.

Option A is without error and is correct.
Mannheim Thread Master
User avatar
S
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 182
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2017, 08:30
A is correct choice. I would prefer to focus on elimination strategy here. Although choice A is clear and logical sentence. B is out - describes proponents, that doesn't make any sense.

C - Prepositional phrase is wordy.
D - because of its, doesn't fit well in the sentence
E - The version is repetitive, the words 'possible' and 'could' are together not required in a sentence.
_________________
2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig
Mannheim Thread Master
User avatar
S
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 182
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2017, 01:13
Answer choice 'A' is correct:


Explanation: The main point of this sentence is that a proposed aircraft could fly between any two points on Earth in under two hours; that information should be presented in the main clause. Qualifications of this point (who says it, how it can be accomplished) are a secondary focus and should, therefore be presented in adverbial phrases.
_________________
2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2017
Posts: 15
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2019, 00:30
Hi GMATNINJA,
Could you please throw some light on this question. This is a good question to explain how gmat can trick you with modifers+meaning.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Posts: 54
CAT Tests
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2019, 02:17
Experts kindly explain the answer of the question(with justification for wrong ones also).
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 766
Re: According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2019, 08:18
mymba99 wrote:
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

(A) According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, by skimming along the top of the atmosphere, fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

(B) By skimming along the top of the atmosphere, proponents of a proposed new style of aircraft say it could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.

(C) A proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours, according to its proponents, with it skimming along the top of the atmosphere.

(D) A proposed new style of aircraft, say its proponents, could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours because of its skimming along the top of the atmosphere.

(E) According to its proponents, skimming along the top of the atmosphere makes it possible that a proposed new style of aircraft could fly between most points on Earth in under two hours.


regarding choice C
"with+noun+noun modifier" can work as adverb to modify the main clause.
inhere "with it skimming..." can modify a clause but this phrase can not jump over" according to ... proponents" to modify the main clause. neither "with it skimming.." can modify any noun . so , this phrase dose not work. choice c is gone
regarding choice d
possesive+doing+direct object is alway wrong. think this phrase as a hard and fast rule without understanding of gerund and participle. choice d is gone
regarding choice e
"skimming" can not refer to aircraft. doing can refer/modify to a noun in some specific pattern.
skimming along the tops, the aircraft moves very fast. this is correct because skimming can refer to the subject. skimming in choice e refer to general action not done by any noun in the sentence.
another error is that "possible" and "could" is redundant. the main clause should be "aircraft fly" it "possible" is kept.
choice e is gone
Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 136
Location: India
Schools: Tuck '21, ISB '20, NTU '20
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 670 Q45 V37
CAT Tests
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2019, 13:23
Options B and E are absolutely hilarious.
Sounds like the proponents are skimming along the top of the atmosphere and that enables the aircraft to fly faster.

I could almost imagine the proponents skimming along the top of the atmosphere like Superman but holding the blueprints in their hands...
_________________
Please award KUDOS if my post helps. Thank you.
GMAT Club Bot
According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b   [#permalink] 07 Jun 2019, 13:23

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 43 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

According to its proponents, a proposed new style of aircraft could, b

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne