It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 05:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect.

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 169
GMAT 1: 700 Q43 V42
According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2012, 22:55
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect. Could someone please explain them to me?

"Following the gold rush, the mining town collapsed." (The correct version is "After the gold rush, the mining town collapsed.")

"We adopted new policies with the aim to reduce theft." (The correct versions are "We adopted new policies aimed at reducing theft" and "We adopted procedures with the aim of reducing theft.")

"When compared to horses, zebras are viscous." (The correct versions are "In comparison with (or to) horses, zebras are viscous", "A zebra can be compared to a horse in many ways", and Compared with a horse, however, a zebra is very hard to tame.")

I am a native English speaker, and these sound correct to me, but I am obviously missing something.
_________________

If my post helped you, please consider giving me kudos.

 Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes EMPOWERgmat Discount Codes e-GMAT Discount Codes
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4128
Re: Why are these idioms incorrect? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2012, 18:29
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
I'm happy to help with these.

"Following the gold rush, the mining town collapsed." (The correct version is "After the gold rush, the mining town collapsed.")

Technically, the word "following" is a participle, and therefore it should "touch" the noun that is doing the following. Thus,
"Following the dog act, the pony act was a disappointment."
The pony act is the actually think that "followed", that did the "following."
In the sentence above --- yes, that sentence would pass as perfectly correct in colloquial language but technically, the "mining town" did not perform the action of "following" anything.

"We adopted new policies with the aim to reduce theft." (The correct versions are "We adopted new policies aimed at reducing theft" and "We adopted procedures with the aim of reducing theft.")

To "aim at" is correct.
To speak of an "aim of doing X" is correct.

The construction "aim" + "to" is technically not correct. Again, you will hear this in colloquial speech, but that's no guide --- colloquial speech is littered with errors. I don't know that I can "explain" anything besides making the rule clear.

"When compared to horses, zebras are viscous." (The correct versions are "In comparison with (or to) horses, zebras are viscous", "A zebra can be compared to a horse in many ways", and "Compared with a horse, however, a zebra is very hard to tame.")

First of all, I believe the word you want is
vicious -- wild, dangerous, not easily tamed,
and not
viscous --- (of a fluid) thick, syrupy, not easily flowing

The first one makes the famous "missing verb" mistake. The GMAT brutally punishes the following construction
[conjunction][participial phrase]

You see, a conjunction (like "when") must be followed by a full bonafide noun + verb clause, NOT simply a participial phrase. See these blog articles:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/participle ... -the-gmat/
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... b-mistake/

Thus, the construction would have to be "When they are compared to horses, etc.", but that's now awkwardly long and indirect.

Does all this make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4128
Re: Why are these idioms incorrect? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2012, 15:40
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
commdiver wrote:
Thank you for the help. The last one about zebras still does not make sense to me. How is the first missing a verb? I thought "are" is a verb.

In the sentence.....

When compared to horses, zebras are vicious.

.... the green part, the independent clause ---- that's fine. It has a bonafide subject ("zebras") and a bonafide verb ("are"). Perfect. The problem is with the red part ----- here the subordinate conjunction "when" is not followed by a bonafide noun + verb clause, but rather by "compared to horses", a participial phrase. That is a construction common in colloquial English and wrong 100% of the time on the GMAT Sentence Correction. Similarly, the construction [subordinate conjunction] + [adjective], by itself, is not complete, and therefore always wrong. Here are further examples of what the GMAT would consistently consider incorrect:
Although sad, I went to the part.
While talking to my friend on my cellphone, I ran a red light.
Because intelligent beyond her years, the student was advanced to the next grade level.
When frightened, my cat hides under the bed.

Those red constructions would be wrong 100% of the time on the GMAT Sentence Correction.

Does all this make sense?

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 169
GMAT 1: 700 Q43 V42
Re: Why are these idioms incorrect? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2012, 10:12
Thank you for the help. The last one about zebras still does not make sense to me. How is the first missing a verb? I thought "are" is a verb.
_________________

If my post helped you, please consider giving me kudos.

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 169
GMAT 1: 700 Q43 V42
Re: Why are these idioms incorrect? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2012, 19:09
So, the red part needs to be a main clause in order for the idiom to be correct?
_________________

If my post helped you, please consider giving me kudos.

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4128
Re: Why are these idioms incorrect? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2012, 11:41
commdiver wrote:
So, the red part needs to be a main clause in order for the idiom to be correct?

This is actually not a point of idiom, but rather of basic grammar. The "red part" (a.k.a the subordinate clause) must be a full clause --- that is to say, must have a full (noun + verb) structure. I would not use the term "main clause", because then it could be confused with the independent clause.

Does all this make sense?

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10156
Re: According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2014, 21:17
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10156
Re: According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2017, 08:04
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect.   [#permalink] 06 Jan 2017, 08:04
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Manhattan GMAT Ch.12 question 5 25 Nov 2013, 11:24
Grammar Fundamentals For Magoosh or Manhattan GMAT 0 30 Aug 2013, 13:45
5 Manhattan says the following are correct: correct: Apples 6 22 Jul 2016, 12:01
1 Example taken from Manhattan: Incorrect sentence: Mary buys 2 16 Jul 2014, 03:02
Manhattan says the following are correct: S-1: They wanted 2 21 Mar 2012, 02:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect.

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.